COLOR vs. B&W (Black & White)
FramerMCB
Loc: Northern, ID (formerly Portland, OR area)
I thought I would post some pairs of photos and ellicit some responses from my fellow "Hoggers" concerning your various opinions as to whether you prefer the attached photos in the original color captures (with some minor PP) or in the PP B&W versions. All PP was done using Canon's native software included with my 40D.
Have fun viewing and responding! Thanks.
PS: And yes, my son had a little "boo-boo" on his nose when this was taken. He's a bit of a "rough-n-tumble" lad.
Rhodenderons in Spring - Color
(
Download)
Rhodenderons in Spring - B&W
(
Download)
(Large) Magnolia Blossom - Color
(
Download)
(Large) Magnolia Blossom - B&W
(
Download)
My youngest son - w/my middle son in the background - Color
(
Download)
My youngest son - w/my middle son in the background - B&W (cropped in a little)
(
Download)
For single blooms, I like color. Color is sort of what a single bloom is all about.
RMM
Loc: Suburban New York
How are you converting to black and white? There are many techniques and they can make quite a big difference in the results.
For me colour every time.
I see you added shots of children. Here I like the B&W
Color on all three. B&W is great when you are wanting alot of contrast and creating a mood, i.e.old buildings, barns, etc.
indycaver wrote:
Color on all three. B&W is great when you are wanting alot of contrast and creating a mood, i.e.old buildings, barns, etc.
I would have to agree. Not all photos lend themselves to b&w, and, to me anyway, there are situations where you just expect to see color, such as flowers and a young kid with a bright red shirt.
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
It's not a matter of which is "better". It's a matter of personal opinion. I remember when all photos were B&W. No one would say that Ansel Adam's shots were no goog because they were not color.
RMM
Loc: Suburban New York
The reason I asked about how you converted to black and white is illustrated by the attached. I opened it in Adobe Camera Raw, used a fill light to bring out the boy's face, cropped, converted to black and white adjusting the individual color sliders, then opened in Photoshop. There, I did a quick selection of the background, duplicated to a new layer which I set to Multiply mode, and duplicated that layer again a couple of times. Net result: a dark background and a more dramatic black and white. Net time: a little over 5 minutes.
You can do considerably better starting with your original image.
FramerMCB
Loc: Northern, ID (formerly Portland, OR area)
RMM wrote:
How are you converting to black and white? There are many techniques and they can make quite a big difference in the results.
Just using Canon's native RAW conversion software included with my camera...their DPP, I believe it's referred to.
FramerMCB
Loc: Northern, ID (formerly Portland, OR area)
RMM wrote:
The reason I asked about how you converted to black and white is illustrated by the attached. I opened it in Adobe Camera Raw, used a fill light to bring out the boy's face, cropped, converted to black and white adjusting the individual color sliders, then opened in Photoshop. There, I did a quick selection of the background, duplicated to a new layer which I set to Multiply mode, and duplicated that layer again a couple of times. Net result: a dark background and a more dramatic black and white. Net time: a little over 5 minutes.
You can do considerably better starting with your original image.
The reason I asked about how you converted to blac... (
show quote)
Thanks! I felt it was lacking...a little busy with "light" in the background - the bush on the right. Unfortunately the only software I have at the moment is the Canon DPP...
FramerMCB
Loc: Northern, ID (formerly Portland, OR area)
LFingar wrote:
I would have to agree. Not all photos lend themselves to b&w, and, to me anyway, there are situations where you just expect to see color, such as flowers and a young kid with a bright red shirt.
Thanks for commenting! I would agree that not all photos are worth creating a B&W of. Although, sometimes I find it fun to play around and see what I can do...for example:
Sepia toned of my "middle" son...
(
Download)
FramerMCB
Loc: Northern, ID (formerly Portland, OR area)
indycaver wrote:
Color on all three. B&W is great when you are wanting alot of contrast and creating a mood, i.e.old buildings, barns, etc.
I would tend to agree although I do like the B&W of my son - I find it helps focus on the textures and his facial expression in the photo. The two flower examples I used were, in my opion also preferred as color, although, they are at best two-toned images...so nearly mono-chrome.
FramerMCB
Loc: Northern, ID (formerly Portland, OR area)
dsmeltz wrote:
For single blooms, I like color. Color is sort of what a single bloom is all about.
You mean like this one...?
Another Magnolia...just starting to open.
(
Download)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.