Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Composition and Photo Journalism
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Jan 25, 2014 09:14:03   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
Do compositional rules, like the rule of thirds, apply to journalistic photographs or is capturing the moment more important?

Reply
Jan 25, 2014 09:17:28   #
Bret Loc: Dayton Ohio
 
Get the shot....and let the editors sort it out later.

Reply
Jan 25, 2014 09:18:35   #
Mr PC Loc: Austin, TX
 
Rules are meant to be bent or broken. But I would think that the basics of good composition would apply to any time you need a Wow photo, especially one that will tell a story. Whether the way the photo was captured in the first place (the ideal) or if it benefits from post processing.

Reply
 
 
Jan 25, 2014 09:51:58   #
jkaye65 Loc: Chico, CA
 
Yes, composition and rule of thirds still count in photojournalism.

At least that is what we were told in PJ school.

However, 20 years ago when I was shooting for a daily paper in upstate NY, I had an editor who was an idiot. He would crop images so much that all the drama, emotion, and style were left on the cutting room floor.

I still get miffed when I think of all my great shots he trashed.

Reply
Jan 25, 2014 09:57:03   #
Moles Loc: South Carolina
 
Sure, it applies, but often you don't have time to do anything but capture the action. Editors can't always have exactly what they want, they have to publish what they have.

Reply
Jan 25, 2014 09:58:45   #
CHuckle's Loc: Lockhart, Texas
 
Mr PC wrote:
Rules are meant to be bent or broken. But I would think that the basics of good composition would apply to any time you need a Wow photo, especially one that will tell a story. Whether the way the photo was captured in the first place (the ideal) or if it benefits from post processing.


well said!

Reply
Jan 25, 2014 10:00:09   #
Darkroom317 Loc: Mishawaka, IN
 
There is no such thing as the rule of thirds, it is a guide that can be and should often be broken. However, as with any notions of composition, yes they apply.

Reply
 
 
Jan 26, 2014 07:07:57   #
A.J.R. Loc: Devon, UK
 
Some of the great photojournalistic shots are great because they not only tell the story, but the composition of the photograph is also great and helps in every way to convey that story.

Reply
Jan 26, 2014 07:20:39   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
All concepts of doing photography always apply yet circumstances may necessitate deviating from best practices.

PJ often takes place during the rush of events in which almost any image that captures the moment or part of it will do to convey interest and understanding as an adjunct to text.

As a wordless medium of human expression, no photograph tells a story in the conventional sense.

Reply
Jan 26, 2014 07:39:28   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
The movie "Close Up" is about a photo that had a murder going on in the back ground. Rule of thirds would have lost that part of the image!!! A street shot includes the smells and experience of all that is going on and puts the viewer on that street in that moment of time.

Reply
Jan 26, 2014 07:41:59   #
Shakey Loc: Traveling again to Norway and other places.
 
Yes and no. The photo editor's task is to select photo's that convey mood, raise emotion in the reader, or match the agenda of the newspaper. All newspapers and magazines have an agenda that advertisers can support. That agenda may be political or economic or teaching a subject that appeals to the reader. Obvious examples are photos of the President: attractive in Democratic newspapers, anything but attractive in Republican newspapers. That's the way of the world. As a photo-journalist you always set out to capture what the editor needs, not what you think is a great photo. Plus, unless the photo is truly outstanding, the editor will only have so much space to spare for a photo. That's why editors will hack your photos around and destroy your original concept. Yes, I've been there and wept, too.

Reply
 
 
Jan 26, 2014 09:07:11   #
Swamp Gator Loc: Coastal South Carolina
 
The Rule of Thirds is in reality just a Suggestion of Thirds, every photo and situation is different never more so then in photojournalism.

Plus for publications like newspapers an editor will likely crop a photo anyway to fill a space they have.
Doesn't matter if your prize winning shot works best as a horizontal, they have a vertical space to fill...your shot is being cropped into a vertical.

Reply
Jan 26, 2014 09:44:10   #
ole sarg Loc: south florida
 
I don't think you have ever worked on a newspaper!

The editorial pages are separate from the ad pages. There is a wall.







Shakey wrote:
Yes and no. The photo editor's task is to select photo's that convey mood, raise emotion in the reader, or match the agenda of the newspaper. All newspapers and magazines have an agenda that advertisers can support. That agenda may be political or economic or teaching a subject that appeals to the reader. Obvious examples are photos of the President: attractive in Democratic newspapers, anything but attractive in Republican newspapers. That's the way of the world. As a photo-journalist you always set out to capture what the editor needs, not what you think is a great photo. Plus, unless the photo is truly outstanding, the editor will only have so much space to spare for a photo. That's why editors will hack your photos around and destroy your original concept. Yes, I've been there and wept, too.
Yes and no. The photo editor's task is to select p... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 26, 2014 09:53:18   #
Darkroom317 Loc: Mishawaka, IN
 
ole sarg wrote:
I don't think you have ever worked on a newspaper!

The editorial pages are separate from the ad pages. There is a wall.


Exactly. There is a definite wall. However, ad placement does affect photographs when it comes to design. As a photo editor, I work with the designer to compromise so that my photographers composition isn't hatched and to protect the journalistic integrity of the image. Making a newspaper is a very sloppy process.

Reply
Jan 26, 2014 09:54:08   #
Jer Loc: Mesa, Arizona
 
I agree. What most people don't understand is that photojournalist always composes. Composition always adds to the shot.I don't understand why people I think we don't compose, we do. However, what the editor does to us is a different story.

jkaye65 wrote:
Yes, composition and rule of thirds still count in photojournalism.

At least that is what we were told in PJ school.

However, 20 years ago when I was shooting for a daily paper in upstate NY, I had an editor who was an idiot. He would crop images so much that all the drama, emotion, and style were left on the cutting room floor.

I still get miffed when I think of all my great shots he trashed.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.