Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Former US generals starting to take action
Nov 24, 2013 17:03:41 #
http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/u-s-generals-now-take-action-to-watch-obama/
Too bad the active generals aren't participating.
Too bad the active generals aren't participating.
Nov 24, 2013 17:26:56 #
The sad fact is this will probably be like my dog---Bark Loud then hide. I'd like to see a place to sign up
Nov 24, 2013 17:49:54 #
bcheary wrote:
http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/u-s-generals-now-take-action-to-watch-obama/
Too bad the active generals aren't participating.
Too bad the active generals aren't participating.
Too bad that NO ONE in Washington is going to give it the slightest regard nor a single glance. Especially this guy:
Laughing at you!
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Nov 24, 2013 19:57:30 #
Gee, What happen to you strict Constitutionalists? Did you miss the part where the President is the Commander in Chief? Guess that one got by you.
You see the people pick the President and he gets to pick the Generals.
Look at history he's not the first to fire Generals.
Lincoln did it, Truman did it, George H Bush did it and a bunch of others too numerous to list, but this time its different because you don't like him.
You see the people pick the President and he gets to pick the Generals.
Look at history he's not the first to fire Generals.
Lincoln did it, Truman did it, George H Bush did it and a bunch of others too numerous to list, but this time its different because you don't like him.
Nov 24, 2013 20:06:10 #
Frank T wrote:
Gee, What happen to you strict Constitutionalists? Did you miss the part where the President is the Commander in Chief? Guess that one got by you.
You see the people pick the President and he gets to pick the Generals.
Look at history he's not the first to fire Generals.
Lincoln did it, Truman did it, George H Bush did it and a bunch of others too numerous to list, but this time its different because you don't like him.
You see the people pick the President and he gets to pick the Generals.
Look at history he's not the first to fire Generals.
Lincoln did it, Truman did it, George H Bush did it and a bunch of others too numerous to list, but this time its different because you don't like him.
Yeah, but what a sorry ass commander-in-thief!
Nov 24, 2013 20:06:28 #
Lmarc wrote:
Too bad that NO ONE in Washington is going to give it the slightest regard nor a single glance. Especially this guy:
:lol: :lol: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Nov 24, 2013 20:06:46 #
farnsworth52 wrote:
The sad fact is this will probably be like my dog---Bark Loud then hide. I'd like to see a place to sign up
Yup.
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Nov 24, 2013 20:10:35 #
bcheary wrote:
Yeah, but what a sorry ass commander-in-thief!
Bcheary, you certainly have a way with words! :lol: :lol:
But I can find no way to disagree with your assessment! :thumbup: :thumbup:
Nov 24, 2013 20:17:21 #
Nov 24, 2013 20:17:21 #
Lmarc wrote:
Bcheary, you certainly have a way with words! :lol: :lol:
But I can find no way to disagree with your assessment! :thumbup: :thumbup:
But I can find no way to disagree with your assessment! :thumbup: :thumbup:
:lol: :lol:
Nov 24, 2013 20:17:57 #
mwoods222 wrote:
After being a soldier for 32 years this really causes this me to worry
Thank you for your service. :thumbup: :thumbup:
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Nov 25, 2013 08:03:14 #
Frank T wrote:
Gee, What happen to you strict Constitutionalists? Did you miss the part where the President is the Commander in Chief? Guess that one got by you.
You see the people pick the President and he gets to pick the Generals.
Look at history he's not the first to fire Generals.
Lincoln did it, Truman did it, George H Bush did it and a bunch of others too numerous to list, but this time its different because you don't like him.
You see the people pick the President and he gets to pick the Generals.
Look at history he's not the first to fire Generals.
Lincoln did it, Truman did it, George H Bush did it and a bunch of others too numerous to list, but this time its different because you don't like him.
I am a vet and was proud to call President John F Kennedy my Commander in Chief but sure as H could say that about the one now. :thumbdown:
Nov 25, 2013 08:36:01 #
bcheary wrote:
http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/u-s-generals-now-take-action-to-watch-obama/
Too bad the active generals aren't participating.
Too bad the active generals aren't participating.
....Fox News military analyst, claimed...
'Nuf said.
Nov 25, 2013 09:05:57 #
mwoods222 wrote:
After being a soldier for 32 years this really causes this me to worry
Thank you for your service :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Nov 25, 2013 09:44:36 #
Background:
I am a retired (combined Navy & Army) vet.
The president is the CMC (the boss).
Discussion:
I hear your comments, but you provide neither data nor criteria to support your comments. It seems like the typical, rambling discontent dialog I associate with "barracks grumbling" -- a lot of emotion but no substance.
It therefor is difficult to agree or disagree with your comments.
Request:
Please help me understand your position.
I am a retired (combined Navy & Army) vet.
The president is the CMC (the boss).
Discussion:
I hear your comments, but you provide neither data nor criteria to support your comments. It seems like the typical, rambling discontent dialog I associate with "barracks grumbling" -- a lot of emotion but no substance.
It therefor is difficult to agree or disagree with your comments.
Request:
Please help me understand your position.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.