georgevedwards wrote:
I have been just wondering if a better tripod will improve my photos. But so far you have only indicated that "expensive is better" Can you elaborate on why cheaper tripods are not as good? I look to this site to learn knowledge from those who know more than I do. A heavier weight to anchor it better from movement? Less or more what? I would have to know what specifically I am looking for and why before I blindly lay down a wad. When I hear somebody lament about a product they were given because it wasn't the right brand or was inexpensive, and I know they are dumb people with no knowledge of the product, I just shake my head. I know some people just have a lot of money and have to show off, that is why they have expensive stuff, not because of any particular feature that is better. When I get some bucks together and get rid of my Walmart tripod, I want to know what to look for and why it is more expensive.
I have been just wondering if a better tripod will... (
show quote)
There are three main areas to look for when getting a tripod.
1. Legs, yes it must have them..... but more important is the size of the legs, or to the layman how thick they are. Thin legs especially the bottom ones are thin as they fit in the others, being thin they can be flimsy. most tripods have three sections (not all) the thicker the more stable.
2. Joins. NOT leg clips, actual joins/joints. Cheap pods have rivets better ones are all nut/bolt
3. Centre posts, cheap tripods make up for a lack of height with centre posts, tripod at full height, raise the centre post and immediately you have instability. Most tripods have centre posts, there is a difference between good ones and ebay specials
GOOD firm tripod legs that reach a decent height without need to use the centre post are best, unless you have a studio type tripod.
Good quality legs will/may also have a geared centre column, as does the large Manfrotto, the difference is they are there for flexibility NOT to add height, and unlike cheap geared columbs they are manufactured to take the full weight of any camera/lens without the need to be locked in place
I have never to this day found a need for the teeny spiked feet on tripods even in the field :)
I would not buy any legs that were less than £100 new, and for rigidity and stability I prefer Alloy, I have five tripods and none are CF, mainly because I want a mount that will carry heavy gear when needed and will stay sway free in use.
In one photo I hope you can see the difference in leg diameters the manfrotto 475B could be kicked and not move.
Finally centre leg bracing is used on cheap pods because the legs are rubbish and the only way the makers can get them at all stable is to fit centre braces, whereas braces on good legs are there to re enforce already stable legs to the point that flex is all but eliminated.
Are people who fall for these really than dumb
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Professional-Camera-Tripod-Stand-for-Canon-Nikon-Sony-Kodak-silver-/121108320162?pt=UK_Tripods_Monopods&hash=item1c329e4fa2wow a "Professional" tripod for £30, duh
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Professional-Aluminium-Tripod-with-3-Way-Pan-Tilt-Head-plus-Carry-Case-/180970049395?pt=UK_Tripods_Monopods&hash=item2a22a7cf73