Is anyone watching this case as it unfolds in the court room?
Ever since this incident occurred, the liberal, "lame-stream" media has been attempting to convince the public that Trayvon Martin was a "dear, sweet, little 17 yr. old child".
The facts about Travon Martin reveal a completely different picture. The link below will take you to the real story; I must admit, because I'm inclined to look an things like this from all sides, and because I already consider the lame-stream media to be the exact opposite of what they would like for us to believe, I did quite a bit of research about this case early on; it became very evident right from the beginning that Travon Martin was the exact opposite of what the media was trying to portray him as being; and then, as I got up this morning much earlier than usual, I checked my email, received a message which led me to Google this, and here's what I found.
Much has been said in the media about Martin's "poor, grieving parents"; (wait til you hear what the parents are "up to" !)
As it explains in this article, this case has become the biggest "disinformation" case since the attempted "rail-roading" of Richard Jewell, (who was initially a "suspect" in the deadly bombing at the Atlanta Olympics.
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/03/27/trayvon-martin-was-apparently-a-17-year-old-undisciplined-punk-thug-drug-dealing-thief-and-wannabe-gangsta/
Even to a casual observer, it's been obvious that the media was doing many things to make Trayvon look good, and Zimmerman bad.
Now, it's time to dig into this report and find out even more. No one has the total story, but the more information we have the better we can discern the more accurate details.
Gitzo UH wrote:
Is anyone watching this case as it unfolds in the court room?
Ever since this incident occurred, the liberal, "lame-stream" media has been attempting to convince the public that Trayvon Martin was a "dear, sweet, little 17 yr. old child".
The facts about Travon Martin reveal a completely different picture. The link below will take you to the real story; I must admit, because I'm inclined to look an things like this from all sides, and because I already consider the lame-stream media to be the exact opposite of what they would like for us to believe, I did quite a bit of research about this case early on; it became very evident right from the beginning that Travon Martin was the exact opposite of what the media was trying to portray him as being; and then, as I got up this morning much earlier than usual, I checked my email, received a message which led me to Google this, and here's what I found.
Much has been said in the media about Martin's "poor, grieving parents"; (wait til you hear what the parents are "up to" !)
As it explains in this article, this case has become the biggest "disinformation" case since the attempted "rail-roading" of Richard Jewell, (who was initially a "suspect" in the deadly bombing at the Atlanta Olympics.
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/03/27/trayvon-martin-was-apparently-a-17-year-old-undisciplined-punk-thug-drug-dealing-thief-and-wannabe-gangsta/Is anyone watching this case as it unfolds in the ... (
show quote)
Well, that certainly sheds a little more light on the subject. As did the comments that followed thereafter. It seems that even with eye witnesses confirming zimmerman's story that some people just refuse this kid could have been up to "no good". That is not good. But some people would argue with God if given a chance.
hfb
Loc: Northwestern Louisiana
Being up to no good is not justification for murder. Zimmerman murdered Martin. There is no doubt about it. The right wing fantasy machine is really cranking out the myths.
You evidently haven't been following the trial, it wasn't murder as Trayvon was the aggressor....It was self defense...Of course, you won't ever see it that way because of your prejudices...
hfb wrote:
Being up to no good is not justification for murder. Zimmerman murdered Martin. There is no doubt about it. The right wing fantasy machine is really cranking out the myths.
hfb
Loc: Northwestern Louisiana
Screamin Scott wrote:
But it wasn't murder as Trayvon was the aggressor....It was self defense...Of course, you won't ever see it that way because of your prejudices...
If I stalk you and start a fight with you. Then you get the better of me and I shoot you. I am the aggressor all the time and it is murder. I have no prejudices or any ideology. I am making a intelligent rational decision. Pure objectivity no preconceived notions. Just logic.
Where is the proof that Zimmerman "stalked" him & started the fight?...No evidence to back up your allegations...As I said, you evidently haven't been following the trial...As a "Neighborhood Watch" person, he needed to be able to let the Police know where Martin was. As it was he lost sight of him & at that point, Martin confronted him & started the aggression...Of course, your mind is already made up isn't it?...As the saying goes "My mind is already made up, don't confuse me with the facts"...Fits you to a tee since you don't want to accept the facts as they are being presented at the trial...
hfb wrote:
If I stalk you and start a fight with you. Then you get the better of me and I shoot you. I am the aggressor all the time and it is murder. I have no prejudices or any ideology. I am making a intelligent rational decision. Pure objectivity no preconceived notions. Just logic.
So, you are admitting that the facts as presented in the trial mean nothing to you?
hfb wrote:
If I stalk you and start a fight with you. Then you get the better of me and I shoot you. I am the aggressor all the time and it is murder. I have no prejudices or any ideology. I am making a intelligent rational decision. Pure objectivity no preconceived notions. Just logic.
He was told to stay in his car. He should have. - Dave
If you are a "Neighborhood Watch" person, there is no way to be able to tell the Police when they finally arrive, where the suspect has gone if you don't tail them...Plus, if you have listened to the trial, you would already know that following him is not illegal, that much was already stated in court.. Attacking someone who you think is following you is though...
wilsondl2 wrote:
He was told to stay in his car. He should have. - Dave
heyrob
Loc: Western Washington
hfb wrote:
Being up to no good is not justification for murder. Zimmerman murdered Martin. There is no doubt about it. The right wing fantasy machine is really cranking out the myths.
His face and head were bruised and bloody, and you call that murder? You're tilted so far off center you must walk with a limp.
Rbode
Loc: Ft lauderdale, Fla
wilsondl2 wrote:
He was told to stay in his car. He should have. - Dave
You are wrong, that never happened, those words were never spoken.
Try to catch up with the truth.
Pepper
Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
Rbode wrote:
You are wrong, that never happened, those words were never spoken.
Try to catch up with the truth.
That's hard to do when all you get is what the media gives.
Murder or not, this points out the tragic folly of armed amateurs playing at professional police. He should never have had a gun.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.