What kind of owl is this?
May 2, 2013 21:27:42 #
May 2, 2013 21:29:21 #
May 2, 2013 21:31:08 #
Joe F.N. wrote:
That's a Short-eared Owl.
Darn good shots of one, too.
Darn good shots of one, too.
Thank you!
May 2, 2013 21:37:05 #
May 2, 2013 21:39:42 #
May 2, 2013 21:50:42 #
May 3, 2013 04:23:53 #
May 3, 2013 07:46:37 #
May 3, 2013 10:45:31 #
May 3, 2013 11:34:59 #
Kingmapix wrote:
Those ears are so short that it could be called a No Eared Owl.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :lol:
May 3, 2013 15:44:45 #
May 3, 2013 15:55:03 #
May 3, 2013 17:18:42 #
JR1 wrote:
Agreed---I just re-calibrated my monitor and thought I'd done something wrong. I'm only this far in the photo section and I've seen at least 11 photos that were out of focus and nobody said a word but gave these folks a pat on the back for their great shots. It has become the norm here not to mention anything negative to bad photos. At least you had the backbone that I lacked.......Sorry, look OOF to me
May 3, 2013 20:03:47 #
May 4, 2013 01:28:58 #
coco1964 wrote:
Agreed---I just re-calibrated my monitor and thought I'd done something wrong. I'm only this far in the photo section and I've seen at least 11 photos that were out of focus and nobody said a word but gave these folks a pat on the back for their great shots. It has become the norm here not to mention anything negative to bad photos. At least you had the backbone that I lacked.......
Great shots, beautiful shots, sorry, means nothing when in fact, "great shot... but it is not in focus" TELLS the photographer something.
I am beginning to think the "great shot" people simply cut and paste this stock reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.