chapjohn wrote:
I may not have searched the right sites for this answer, but I will ask it here. What are the reasons for shooting moving water with long exposures to get a white silky look? What is the problem with the water looking like water?
No problem with water looking like water but I think most of us who do this kind of photography like the look of motion - that's all.
[quote=chapjohn]I may not have searched the right sites for this answer, but I will ask it here. What are the reasons for shooting moving water with long exposures to get a white silky look? What is the problem with the water looking like water?[/quote
Did YOU try it?,i did and it is accomplishment do I need it ,maybe not, but Hey i can do it
I just can't seem to get my eyelids to open then close for only 1/500 second or so. How then do I get the "natural" look?
mdorn wrote:
I always try to have dead pro photographers judge my work. Funny, they don't really object to much. Of course, I never win anything either. :-) <joke>
I guess what rubs me the wrong way is when someone says they like the "natural" look---and this goes beyond motion blur. I suspect what they are saying is they like photos that represent the way we see things in nature. The problem is that our eyes and our brains see so much more than we can capture with a camera. Given this fact, it's hard to define what looking natural really is. You want natural looking? Then come with me on a hike into the Columbia River Gorge, and I will show you natural looking. Everything else is a weak representation. Post processing helps to make enhance a normally blah image into something that may strike a feeling we had when we saw it truly looking natural.
I always try to have dead pro photographers judge ... (
show quote)
chapjohn wrote:
I may not have searched the right sites for this answer, but I will ask it here. What are the reasons for shooting moving water with long exposures to get a white silky look? What is the problem with the water looking like water?
I have never taken a survey, but about half like it milk blurred and half sharp. I like it sharp. David
As has been clearly shown in this thread- many different opinions on the subject - which I can well understand -and accept.
Meives wrote:
I have never taken a survey, but about half like it milk blurred and half sharp. I like it sharp. David
MtnMan wrote:
Well, it also isn't still.
I attended a presentation where a guy suggested 1/13 sec is kind of a nice mix if you like reality. It isn't still and it isn't pillowy.
I like this one. I've grown a bit tired of the long exposure look of water. For me, it's been overdone. Just my opinion, of course.
Meives wrote:
I have never taken a survey, but about half like it milk blurred and half sharp. I like it sharp. David
I think your unscientific survey might be a little skewed. Depending on the photo, I like both effects. For example, for slower moving water I like to slow my shutter down (milky). On the other hand, with faster moving water I like to speed up my shutter (frozen). It all depends on what I am shooting and what effect I am trying to accomplish. If you are just a meat & potato kind of guy, that's fine, but treat yourself to other stuff too once in a while. You might just like it. :-)
skidooman wrote:
Ask 2 photographers and you'll get 3 different answers. Do whatever floats your boat and makes you happy. It's all part of the fun (creative process). You'll never please everyone no matter what you do :)
True, but if you are selling, the more people you please the better. :-)
chapjohn wrote:
I may not have searched the right sites for this answer, but I will ask it here. What are the reasons for shooting moving water with long exposures to get a white silky look? What is the problem with the water looking like water?
I think people like to show off a bit
djmills wrote:
I think people like to show off a bit
Ya think? Photography is pretty self serving to begin with. Let's face it, we don't do this only to please ourselves. It's nice once in awhile to get a compliment. Of course, there may be a fine line between showing off and arrogance. I'm NEVER arrogant even when I show off. Just wish I had something to show off. :-)
Myself not being a pro photographer but one who spent his whole working life selling in both retail and wholesale ( rout sales to stores & restaurants) If you don't have what sells- you are out o business.
This said if I had photos on the wall that out sold some almost like it - I would have far more of those that sold first.
no matter what my opinion was.
mdorn wrote:
True, but if you are selling, the more people you please the better. :-)
blacks2 wrote:
What's wrong with that? Milky? It's the mountain goats up stream. LOL.
For my taste This is TOP NOTCH!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.