Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Posts for: more-or-less
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
Mar 7, 2024 17:16:22   #
(Sub-Gallery: Birds)
Why I shoot at 30 frames per second, you should too
billnikon wrote:
Since administration is encouraging posting images on the main photography Discussion site I believe I will start posting there also with a photo lean to them.
Lets see, please note that this image was taken with a Sony a1 (best camera on the market today) that should elicit some nice responses.
It was taken with the 200-600 zoom lens, (sharpest zoom lens on the market today) this should get some discussion also.
I like to take my meter reading off green trees which reflect 18% of the light, just like a gray card. Then depending on the color of the bird I under expose using manual one to two stops. Although on all white birds I might go even more stops.
On this shot I pre focused on the branches so when the Male Great Egret came in with nesting material I was ready to shoot and my Sony focusing system was set to Zone and it picked up the male in a nano second.
Shooting at 30 fps and I chose the shot that best described the situation.
Boy, this was fun.
Since administration is encouraging posting images... (show quote)


What program did you use to look at one frame? Was the video an avi or mp3 file?
What was the file type of the single image?
Thanks for your help
Go to
Apr 27, 2020 10:42:35   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
shutter timer release
thanks
Go to
Apr 27, 2020 10:10:19   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
shutter timer release
What is the best shutter timer release for the Nikon D850?
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 17:47:22   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Printing 24x36 prints from jpg or tiff
I can't determine what the color space is nor if it could print either 8 or 16 bit prints.
What am I missing? - thx
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 17:12:43   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Printing 24x36 prints from jpg or tiff
Yes I can print a tiff image with that printer. Should I be able to see a difference?
I am using a Nikon D850 (8256 x 5504)resolution.
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 16:57:53   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Printing 24x36 prints from jpg or tiff
I am printing on a wide format Canon iPF 765. Image ProGraf
Not sure of the specs.
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 16:57:32   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Printing 24x36 prints from jpg or tiff
I am printing on a wide format Canon iPF 765. Image ProGraf
Not sure of the specs.
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 15:31:20   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Printing 24x36 prints from jpg or tiff
Creating a tiff from a raw file and saving both a tiff and a jpg.
When you print both of them at 24x36 should you be able to see a difference in quality?
Both printed at 300dpi.
Go to
May 20, 2019 16:56:44   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Photo stacking as a way to reduce noise
thanks
Go to
May 20, 2019 16:34:31   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Photo stacking as a way to reduce noise
Does anyone know if combining multiple images could be used as a method of reducing noise?
Go to
Apr 17, 2019 19:06:36   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Print size vs file size and type
I will try to clarify.
I will be converting both images to 300dpi for plotting.
Both files will be printed on a wide format Canon printer.
Would I expect to see any difference in the output.
Assuming the tiff file was PP to match the jpg as best as I can.
Go to
Apr 17, 2019 13:04:03   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Print size vs file size and type
Would this be a true statement:
Given a print size of 3’x4’ wouldn’t a tiff file of (93 meg) created from a raw file produce a better quality print than a jpg file produced from the camera of (32 meg), all things being equal?
Working with a Nikon D850.
Go to
Jan 18, 2019 12:29:27   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Higher resolution monitor's for editing
jeep_daddy wrote:
No and NO


Great - thanks
Go to
Jan 18, 2019 12:28:48   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Higher resolution monitor's for editing
CHG_CANON wrote:
A pixel is a pixel ...

When viewed at 100%, your 1920x1200 screen shows you a crop of 1920x1200 pixels, just a smaller percentage of the larger 8256 x 5504 image than say a 1920x1200 crop of an 6000x4000 image. An image sized to exactly 1920x1200-pixels will display at 100% (no further cropping / no further zoom) on your 1920x1200 screen. Obviously, you can go beyond 100%, but there is no more detail to be seen beyond 100%.


Got it - Thanks
Go to
Jan 18, 2019 10:34:55   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Higher resolution monitor's for editing
I have a D850. Which gets you 8256 x 5504 pixels.
Does anyone know what the relationship is of viewing and editing these images on a computer monitor that has a resolution of 1920 x 1200 as opposed to using an 8K system which would have a resolution of 7680 x 4320. Dell is starting to come out with these specs but the systems are pretty expensive.
Does that mean you will be able to see more detail in your photos?
Does it really matter?
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.