Once the doors were opened, all the sailboat fuel would have leaked out leaving the trailer empty.

Yes, yes it is...

Has the printer sat unused for any length of time and are you using Canon ink. Just for kicks and giggles, run the printer through a cleaning cycle and check the printout to make sure none of the nozzles are clogged. I let my Pro 10 sit for a while because I was only printing smaller prints and I was using a smaller printer. I then printed a larger print and noticed the color was off. I ran the diagnostic and sure enough, there were clogged nozzles. I ran it through multiple cleaning cycles and finally all the nozzles were firing. I have to remember to run the diagnostic periodically to keep all the nozzles happy.

Pretty...

Although I don't have that camera or any other GE camera, THM files are usually thumbnail files and usually hidden. If they are thumbnail files they shouldn't take up much space. In certain applications, thumbnail files store metadata that's needed by a corresponding file such as a video file. For kicks and giggles I scanned the cameras user manual and found no reference to thm or THM.

What a beautiful animal. Very nice pics.

What's so difficult about one is an image file format and one is not.
I've never understood the "argument" about RAW vs JPEG or any other image file format. RAW is simply the unformatted data, with a little tiny JPEG thumbnail embedded in it. A JPEG is an image file containing compressed formatted data. RAW data is the unedited data straight from the image sensor and written to storage. A JPEG has preset edit configurations applied to the data along with data compression before being written to storage. Many people prefer JPEG'S because they are usually good enough and don't require post processing but, there is still enough available data to make minor alterations or corrections to the image. RAW on the other hand gives the user the ability to edit, modify and correct just about any characteristic of the image except for say, focus, and even Canon's dual pixel RAW allows even minor focus corrections.
Personally I almost always shoot RAW, I like the control it affords the user. When I shoot JPEG I make sure the edit configurations are set to give me consistently good images.

I recommend you get a lens Canon intended for your situation, the Canon EF-S 18-135. Unlike FF lenses, it's made for crop sensors. Another good choice is the EF-S 18-200. I have both lenses and use them on my Rebel bodies all the time. They are quite versatile and are quite capable of creating excellent images.

Yes, we all know you were a teacher, you've mentioned it many, many times. Even more than once in this conversation. Since you were a teacher, go back and analyze what I said. I did not say I didn't take the OP seriously. I didn't even say I didn't take the question seriously.

I rarely see posters on a photography oriented site get the model of their camera wrong, rarely. But according to you, it's most common. Obviously we see things differently. I didn't say anything about not understanding the question. That's you putting words in my mouth. I said it's hard to take the QUESTION seriously. I did NOT say it was hard to take the poster seriously as some have implied.

Yes, it is tough but someone has to do it.

It's hard to take the question seriously when the poster can't get the camera model correct.

If that's the case then the lack of smiley faces 😉 makes one wonder. I'm not familiar with all the different characters and require these subtle hints.

You already own a mirrorless camera, your iPhone.

Do you realize how ridiculous that statement is, and how wrong it is? Are you one of the people who needs to justify their own actions by criticizing others or are you simply an antagonist looking to rattle a few cages?! Either way, you are wrong. Nothing bad happens to something just because something different was purchased.