While it's utterly fascinating to learn all there is to know about the origin of "docent," are there any readers left who care about the discussion Delderby presented in the opening of this thread?

My criteria for assessing a photo as print-worthy:
https://photographylife.com/whats-important-in-a-photograph-and-what-isnt

For me, sharpness is a personal preference and subject-related (such as Gene suggests with wildlife). Most of the photos currently on my walls, all my own work, are soft on purpose.

I think the line is drawn between taking the picture (O.K.) and posting it on the internet (not O>K>); If you take your children out in public, neither you nor the child has any expectation of privacy.
But you and the child probably do have an expectation that the child's image will not be made available to everyone. I'm a retired lawyer who practiced criminal defense law so nobody should take what I've said as a basis upon which to act. I'm relying on memory from a first year law school class in torts more than fifty years ago.