Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Dan Ausec
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
Sep 12, 2023 08:02:43   #
Mac wrote:
Since Leica and Hasselblad have fewer sales and a smaller market share than Canon does that mean Canon is “far superior” than those two?


Go to
Jun 10, 2022 11:55:30   #
whatdat wrote:
I am looking at the z50 w/2 kit lenses. Had not met anyone that owns one. What do you think of the z50 & what lens(es) are you using on it? Would stretch my budget but I would like to get one when I can for the times when I want to carry something smaller & lighter than my d7000 is d7500. Your opinion would be appreciated.

—-Michael


Highly recommend..I kept my D7100 but more and more pick up my Z50 with the 2 kit lenses, which are surprisingly good ! I've added the 28mm prime for street photography..you will love the size and weight difference and the menus will be very familiar to you..not much of a learning curve..check reviews..hard to find much criticism with this combo..enjoy !
Go to
May 24, 2022 09:06:43   #
RKL349 wrote:
I agree, I love this combo. I use mine a lot. What it cannot do in lower light, my Z6II will do.


Go to
May 24, 2022 08:38:27   #
Texas1833 wrote:
Thanks so much to all of you. I’m placing my order now.


Congrats..you will absolutely love the set up..have had mine for 2 years now and surprisingly, the kit lenses are much better than I could have imagined..check the reviews for the lenses and have fun !
Go to
May 22, 2022 10:03:23   #
yssirk123 wrote:
And on camera bodies they show shutter count.


Go to
May 22, 2022 08:29:38   #
Mike D. wrote:
In the past I have purchased from KEH with zero problems but now there are more choices.

Has anyone had a positive experience with MPB.com? Feel free to suggest any other online stores that you have received good or great service from.

Thanks,

Mike


I have dealt with MPB and Used Photo Pro ( Roberts Camera ) on numerous occasions..both companies top notch..I'm sure KEH is the same..I just look for the best deal between all the reputable companies and don't think you can go wrong with any of them..I lean towards Roberts myself because like someone mentioned, they have photos of the actual item that you are buying .I had a little problem with a flash once, called them up, and 3 days later had a replacement..no questions asked
Go to
May 14, 2022 09:08:33   #
Longshadow wrote:
Ask them to pick a replacement image and hang the one they feel is politically incorrect in your house.

(I won't say what I feel........ )


Go to
Nov 3, 2021 09:18:19   #
whatdat wrote:
Is Roberts a good & reputable company to deal with?


First class company..bought numerous equipment from Used Photo Pro..bought a used flash and the power could not be changed remotely ( something that they could not have known )..called them and received the replacement immediately..and when I purchase new equipment, Robert's is first on my list.
Go to
Jul 22, 2021 12:34:23   #
yssirk123 wrote:
If you are looking into a Nikon DX camera, check out the Z50. It punches above it's weight class and is bargain priced. Sample images attached.


Go to
Jul 17, 2021 11:47:44   #
Warhorse wrote:
I like chocolate, and really don't care if you like vanilla.


Go to
Jul 17, 2021 11:42:17   #
ron james wrote:
hi team -I traded up and purchased from MBP a Z6 and its grading was excellent category - unfortunately it has a small scratch from obviously being knocked just under monitor-it is probably cosmetic but it does bother me - waiting for XQD card to be delivered before testing -should I reject the camera body and ask for replacement - MPB have been advised and they have offered to make an allowance - not sure if I am being to fussy

any thoughts or advice


MPB is an excellent company and very honest..if they offer any kind of allowance, imo they have gone beyond expectations..if the equipment was rated Like New or Mint, then maybe..a small scratch is trivial stuff especially if there are no functional problems which is all I would care about
Go to
May 9, 2021 09:18:06   #
Jimmy T wrote:
PhotoScapeX can be used accurately with 3 or 4 clicks or you can REALLY get into serious editing. Here are a couple of sites for you, Enjoy. Be sure to select Mac/or Windows. Get the free version first (it never expires), and you can always upgrade. Also, please do yourself a favor and watch the following YouTube videos to see if you would be interested and for training. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWC-SAuYOzw&t=325s Instruction and download info http://x.photoscape.org/

Smile,
JimmyT Sends
PhotoScapeX can be used accurately with 3 or 4 cli... (show quote)

I've been using Photoscape for about 2 yrs ..got the pro version for $40 ..well worth it, especially for the ability to merge bracketed images, and the curves tool is great..but the free version has everything I need also
Go to
Feb 13, 2021 09:02:11   #
JohnSwanda wrote:
I have a Nikon 12-24 zoom I use on my D7100, and I am very happy with it.


I have exactly the same set up..its been great
Go to
Dec 8, 2020 15:14:44   #
autofocus wrote:
Lots of good advice already mentioned above, but I think Gene's suggestion of this, "Even if you are shooting at night, there is always a way to get natural looking and flattering light from a flash - even if it means you need to bring a friend to hold a large bounce surface so that the light source is large and nicely diffused, yet directional." is an excellent idea. And if you can get say a piece of white poster board, maybe at least 2 feet by 3 feet, or piece 2 together for a larger reflector it would be ideal. You also would need an assistant to hold it.
Direct flash is a very hard light, very harsh, and very unflattering. The goal is to make that small light source larger by bouncing it off a larger surface. If you can do this you might want to start with the following setup:
1) swivel the flash around so the light is aimed over your right shoulder, and have your assistant standing back there with the white poster board aimed at the flash. That person should be no further away from the flash than 3-4 feet.
2) I would shoot in full manual and start with a setting of f/5.6, and a shutter speed of !/80 -1/100. This is slow enough to pull in some ambient light (of the Christmas lights) but not too slow to create the possible problem of motion blur that still can occur when using flash with too slow a shutter setting.
3) Set flash to full power, do a quick test shot and see how the exposure looks by checking the histogram. If you think it's too overexposed you can incrementally correct that 3 ways. 1) reduce the flash power output, 2) move the poster board a little further away from the flash, or 3) close your aperture down some, maybe to f/6.3 or f/7.1. My typical choice in a situation like this would be number 3, start by closing down your aperture. But, any one of those, or a combination of those will help.
A little tidbit about using flash or lights: your shutter speed controls the amount of ambient light entering the camera, and your f/stop controls the amount of flash entering the camera. And you can start with your camera's native ISO, maybe ISO 100 on your camera, but an ISO setting of 200 should also be fine. Lastly, disregard what the meter is showing you with the settings I mentioned above and with the camera in full manual mode...it will indicate that you are grossly underexposing the shot, but the flash if used properly will provide for that.
Lots of good advice already mentioned above, but I... (show quote)


Go to
Nov 23, 2020 11:20:17   #
tradio wrote:
If you think supporting a cop hating racist terror organization is caring for people and the environment, I can't help you.


Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.