Another nice drive is Skyline Drive a little north of Moscow.

Also check out Ken Carper Photography at https://www.kencarperphotos.com/ Ken and his wife Tanya are some of my college friends from WSU. They liked the area and decided to make their home there. Ken was an architecture major and has a good eye for photography; many of his photos feature the Palouse area in various seasons.

I like the way Harry Guiness explains things. In this topic, he compares Saturation and Vibrance in Photoshop, and I would guess that they work similarly in other photo-processing programs.

This probably is most useful for those like me, who are not pros or experienced photo editors.

Here's the link:
https://www.howtogeek.com/719427/the-difference-between-saturation-and-vibrance-in-photoshop-lightroom/

Nice portrait, thanks for sharing. They're strange-looking birds.

Thanks for your reply. What I had in mind was if the insect was facing the camera, but the whole body was still visible, extending to the back. Could you still get the back end in focus if it was, say, a couple of inches behind the head? From what you've said, I assume that you could, but it would probably take a LOT of images.

Reminds me of one of my relatives!

How extensively can focus stacking be done? For instance, if you had a frontal shot of something like a grasshopper with its whole body in the picture, could you theoretically have the whole thing in focus?

Thanks again to all who have responded!

JustFred: Same question for SmugMug -- would it allow me to maintain the nested directory structure and still keep the photo-viewing features?

twosummers: Google Drive would probably allow me to keep the nested directory structure, but would it have the other photo-sharing features I mentioned earlier (thumbnail view, and allowing users to click from one photo directly to the next without going back to a list each time)?

Thanks for the suggestions, but I guess I wasn't clear enough on what I want. I want to maintain the nested directory structure on the photo-sharing site, because the organization of that structure makes it easy to find the exact photos people would want to see. So copying them all to one directory and uploading that would defeat that purpose.

I have a Google Photos account, but was not able to figure out how to get it to keep the directory structure.

Any other suggestions are welcome.

I'd like to share a bunch of old family photos with my family. There are about 9 GB of files, organized in a fairly deeply-nested directory structure by subject, year, etc. Do any of you know of any photo-sharing sites that would allow me to upload the whole directory structure at once, so I wouldn't have to manually recreate the directory structure on the photo site and upload each subdirectory's files separately?

I can upload the structure all at once to my own web site, but it's not very convenient for viewing the files -- no thumbnails, just a listing of the file names in each folder, and the users can't just click from one file directly to the next without going back to the list.

I've been helped by some posts on various photography topics by a professional photographer named Harry Guiness. Here's a URL to one about bokeh that I thought was very good; I got his permission to post it to UHH.

https://www.howtogeek.com/692231/what-is-%e2%80%9cbokeh%e2%80%9d-in-photography-and-how-do-you-create-it/

It depends on your level of technical expertise. Assuming that you're not much into getting "under the hood", I'd suggest copying the files from the old computer to an external USB-connected hard drive, then copying from there to the new system. A side benefit of this is that you'd have a backup of your files on the external drive.
Another option would be to back up your files from the old computer to a cloud service, then download them to your new computer from the cloud service.

Funny!

The close-ups would be good, too, but what I meant was to include the original full-sized photos of the ones you already posted. When you post a photo, you can check a box that says something like "include original" -- I don't remember the exact wording. If you don't check that, we only see ones that have been reduced in size to fit on the UHH page.

Very nice! It would be good to have the full-size photos to get more of the detailed stuff. Is there any possibility you could repost and include them?
Thanks!