Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: imagemeister
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 1969 next>>
Apr 23, 2024 14:59:56   #
Very WELL done ! .....thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 23, 2024 13:31:23   #
CamB wrote:
Some thoughts about going mirrorless, which I did about a month and 3000 pictures ago. (Nikon Z611). The mirrorless viewfinder is both good and bad. While composing the shot, pre-exposure, the screen looks a bit wimpy and “digital”. It is not rich and saturated as a mirrored viewfinder and the contrast range is limited. The brights can look washed out even when the histogram (the little one in the viewfinder which I really like) is telling you the exposure is fine. The jpeg from your RAW file that you see after making the exposure looks great. It’s just that pre-exposure shot that lets me down.

I like seeing the exposure change when I manipulate the controls, particularly in dark situations. The thing I miss the most on this camera, is not having a focus point lock. My last three Nikon digital cameras had a little toggle switch to lock the focus point to where I want it to be, but my Z611 has a mind off its own and I keep finding the focus point has shifted from where I left it. This is one of the biggest complaints about this camera I’ve on various NIKON forums.

The number one most annoying thing for me is the “Sub selector” (joy stick). It’s placed right where your thumb hits it when you pick up the camera, and, for the most part does the exact same thing as the “Multi Selector” which is right below it. It sticks up and wiggles and you end up moving it by accident and that shifts the focus point all over the view finder. There is nothing it does that other controls don’t do, and I would disable it if that was an option. It’s not.

The day I received the camera our Symphony Orchestra called me to shoot part of their live concert that had changed in the one day since we shot the rehearsal. This camera has a silent mode that doesn’t make a sound. This was great to use in a situation where I had to deal with an audience. No one even knew I was taking pictures. This is great.

Also, on the plus side, this camera focuses blisteringly fast with my fast, professional lenses. It is the fastest focusing camera I have ever had. The manual for this camera was obviously written by someone who already knew all about it and thought they could leave out information and no one would be bothered. I’ve wasted lots of time trying to figure out things that were barely or incompletely explained.

Regrets about going mirrorless? No. It was time to go full frame and chuck the mirrors. Is it as great as some say? No. It gobbles batteries, the EVF has room for improvement, there are too many controls on the body and no focus lock. In time I will master it and use its many strengths to make great picture. I’m always up for a challenge.

What do others think?
Some thoughts about going mirrorless, which I did ... (show quote)


I was using mirror less in 2012 - so you are about 12 years LATE .....

I do still have 2 mirror cameras tho - each has it's place ....
.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 19:59:10   #
My conclusion from this excercise is :

1. I would NEVER consider using more the one TC at a time - especially at this time in the digital era.
2. If I were using a 2X TC hand held, I would be using as much bracing/stabilizing as I could muster.....AND, I would not be using in a low light situation or where the subject was briskly moving - for AF concerns.
3. Today, If pressed, I will use an APSC camera, with a 1.4X TC and CROP and use pixel enlargement software - in stead of a 2X. Only in a a very serious/desperate situation and in bright near-direct sun would I consider a 2X ......do I have a 2X ? - Yes, Canon III version - have I used it ? Yes - with the 400 DO.

Years ago, I very happily used the 2X II with the Canon 300 2.8 - BEFORE high MP cropping and pixel enlargement software.
.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 17:06:59   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Both much sharper than his.


Go to
Apr 22, 2024 08:57:19   #
Nicely done - what lens are you using for the florals ?? ......thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 08:54:27   #
Yes, a very nice photogenic place ! The Robin needs a bit more exposure .....thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 08:48:48   #
GOOD work ! .......thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 08:45:24   #
Love the overhead perspective ! ......thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 08:42:04   #
An excellent reward for your tenacity ! 8-) They can be very challenging......thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 08:37:59   #
No.4 cropped - Challenging light ! ......thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 08:32:50   #
Unless you have used a really, really SHARP lens - like the Canon 300 2.8 - you probably do not have a good concept of what sharp is ! 8-(
Go to
Apr 21, 2024 21:10:50   #
btbg wrote:
Nobody said it was. The question is should one get the photo even without optimum sharpness, or just not take the photo at all. Each of us has to make that choice. So, if you would not hand hold and would not crop, and would not use a 2x converter, how would you go about getting the photo?


IF I were hand holding I would try to brace somehow, if I were in low light I would crop and use AI pixel enlargement - in better light, I like to use a 1.4X and CROP - staying away from 2X TC. If pressed, I will use an APSC body and get a 1.6X crop that way - on top of a 1.4X TC and cropping and using AI pixel enlargement.
Go to
Apr 21, 2024 14:43:36   #
No. 2 .....
Go to
Apr 21, 2024 14:19:00   #
btbg wrote:
Well, go ahead and try that experiment. I tried to shoot the wren without a converter. That would make it shot with just 400 mm and there is some cropping even with it shot at 1120. So, I don't believe it is possible to crop that mich. I was actually hoping that someone here that is a little compulsive would try exactly that as part of this discussion.


Hand holding @ 1120mm and cropping is not the receipe for optimum sharpness ....
Go to
Apr 21, 2024 14:11:44   #
billnikon wrote:
A Glossy Ibis chick waits for mom to regurgitate a meal while another chick waits for it's turn. Wakodahatchee Wetlands.
Sony a1, Sony 600 f4 @ f4, 1/640 sec. iso 2000, I was shooting into a shaded spot so I switched to Auto, I also switched to small center spot focus so the branches would not interfere with the focusing. The center spot was placed on the chick.


Never seen a Glossy Ibis nest or the little ones - in fact never seen a regular Ibis nest either ! !

I would like to go down to Wako/Green Cay but I do want to drive on I-95 anymore ! ! 8-(
.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 1969 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.