Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: johntaylor333
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 next>>
Jun 18, 2019 11:33:24   #
2mishka wrote:
On kits or digital software to calibrate my camera and lens. Any suggestions?


I use FoCal by Reikan and like it.
Go to
Jun 18, 2019 11:31:59   #


None of these seem to work for recent Canon cameras (I have a 5D4 and a 7D2). I've searched high and wide and not found one that works. Magic lantern may work, but it involves installing new software on your camera and I'm reluctant to do that.

I am a member of Canon CPS, so I get a free cleaning of 10 bodies or lenses per year (shipping included!) and they tell me my shutter counts.
Go to
Jun 18, 2019 11:21:09   #
Blurb are the best for this type of book. They will make trade books or photo books.
Go to
May 4, 2019 10:28:27   #
I am an amateur, but go on long trips, typically returning with 2,000-4,000 photos.

I find LoupeDeck very useful. My workflow is to first apply my standard preset that increases mid-range contrast and adds a bit of sharpening, vibrance, clarity, saturation, etc. Then I do a quick (!!) pass through the pictures rating 1-5 stars. 1 stars are deleted, 2 stars are not looked at again. Then the 3 stars are gone through, primarily to assign 4 or 5 stars to some, but also to downgrade duplicates to 2 stars.

When I have a manageable number (typically around 500-600), I edit each of them for exposure, contrast, white, black, shadow, highlights as these are all individual knobs. I also do straightening, cropping, rotating, white balance etc.

I find the LoupeDeck saves me a lot of time. I do wish it had more dedicated knobs (for dehaze) and innovative ways to speed up cropping, spot removal, adjustment brush, etc.

It was well worth the $219 for me.
Go to
May 3, 2019 10:55:57   #
Desertsun wrote:
I’m looking for feedback from those who have used either or both of these lenses:
Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8 L II (Pros: f/2.8; Cons: no image stabilization, shorter zoom)
Canon EF 24-105 f/4 L IS II (Pros: longer zoom, image stabilization; cons: f/4)

I’m traveling to Barcelona in a couple weeks and want to take one lens. I will be shooting mostly architecture, scenery, people. I have a Canon 5d mk iv and several primes. For convenience, I want to take a zoom and have narrowed my choice to these two lenses. Both lenses get great reviews for travel, but each has pros and cons. I’m hoping someone with experience with either of these lenses can tell me which pros are a must and which cons would be a deal killer. In other words, is the longer focal length of the 24-105 worth giving up the wider aperture? Is the wider aperture of the 24-70 worth giving up a bit of focal length and image stabilization?

Thanks in advance!
I’m looking for feedback from those who have used ... (show quote)


I would also consider the 24-70 f/4L. It is less expensive, lighter and has a 'macro' function (actually 0.7X, but very useful if you like to photograph flowers, insects, etc.)
Go to
Apr 28, 2019 08:40:27   #
Effjayess wrote:
Any preference for a photo book provider?
Typical cost for how many photos ?
Can you get multiple copies of the book?
Do you send photos in the order you want them to a share file site?
Thanks to all who respond.


We've settled mainly on Shutterfly. Waiting for a sale, prices are excellent and the results are good. Did a couple of Blurbs a while ago and didn't like the non-availability of glossier heavy papers (at least for layflat).
Go to
Apr 20, 2019 09:52:42   #
Fit4phun wrote:
Aloha! I have finally got a shot that is worthy for print. But have tried a local print place and the quality and color don't do the picture justice. Can anyone recommend an online place to get large professional metal prints? I am in Hawaii so they have to be able to ship here.


I would recommend Sam's Club. They are actually made by Fuji. I have now ordered about 10 and they are all excellent. Prices are very reasonable, particularly when on (fairly frequent) sale.
Go to
Apr 17, 2019 08:06:29   #
I use Canon Pixma Pro-100 (13x19, 8 ink) and love it. It hasn't clogged once in 3+ years of intermittent use.

When there are deals on them, they can be had for less than $100 (including 50 sheets of Canon 13x19 paper, after MIR)! Unbeatable. Watch out for B&H in particular and get on their e-mail list as they often send out codes that do NOT appear on their website.
Go to
Apr 17, 2019 08:01:05   #
Great shots, both.

I prefer the first as it seems to have more contrast and be a bit sharper.
Go to
Apr 14, 2019 07:28:53   #
bleirer wrote:
I've been looking at macro options for canon. I have rf mount but have the ef adaptor. Canon RP. I see I can get a Canon 500d dioptor for my rf24-105 for about $150, a reversing ring with 77mm threads to a ef mount for $8, or a basic canon macro lens starting around $250.

For occasional wildflower shots, would the dioptor give good results, do the reversing adapters work, or suck it up and budget for a macro lens?


I like my Canon 24-70 f/4L which has a 0.7X (not quite macro) in a good all around lens that I keep on the camera.
Go to
Apr 8, 2019 09:12:02   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
This is Canon's premier zoom lens as sharp at f/2.8 as any aperture. As sharp as L-series primes within the zoom range. It's already a large piece of equipment where adding IS adds both weight and size (and cost).

If you need IS assistance at speeds 1/20 through 1/80 while handholding, consider the well-regarded f/4 IS version.


Plus the f/4 has an almost-macro (0.7X) close focusing feature that I love.
Go to
Apr 7, 2019 08:55:12   #
If you can get there easily (trains work wonderfully in Japan, even if you don't speak Japanese), I suggest Mt. Koya (the holiest place in Japan). Very nice scenery and all the family tombstones are wonderful.

If you want something moving, go to Hiroshima and the bomb memorial with all the paper cranes.
Go to
Mar 20, 2019 08:18:27   #
Kingman wrote:
There are currently numerous posts regarding the conditions for Texas bluebonnet shooting locations. The UH group is wonderful in knowing the all the right places!

Apparently I will be in the DC area for the now predicted peak of the cherry blossoms climax during the first weekend of April. I couldn't have time my trip any better! While I know that the Basin will be the best. Anyone have a particular favorite shooting location(s) and best time of the day. What about sunrise versus sunset? Both? Bring it on!

Oh, I will be back in Texas in time for bluebonnet peak climax likely in North Texas in mid April (Easter weekend).
There are currently numerous posts regarding the c... (show quote)


The blossoms will be in peak bloom around 3-6 April (see https://www.nps.gov/subjects/cherryblossom/bloom-watch.htm)

An alternative with many, but not as many, cherry trees is the National Arboretum on Rt 50 a few miles East of the mall. About 100 times less people!!!
Go to
Mar 17, 2019 19:38:05   #
Look up all the Gaudi building, especially the sagrida familia.

Also, the Salvador Dali house and museum (both near Barcelona) are well worth a visit. You can get a day tour from Barcelona to do both.
Go to
Mar 16, 2019 17:37:21   #
Chris T wrote:
One reads a great deal on the Net - vis a vis this problem, but one is left with a certain uncertainty. It would seem - the higher res one attains - the less the threshold, before the onset of noise. In other words, you are better off with a 12MP camera, than you are with a 24MP camera. And, conversely, you're better off with a 24MP camera, than you are with a 50MP camera, as - the higher you go up the ladder, the higher in density are the photo-sites - which, in turn - makes the onset of noise - that much sooner. Please comment, if you would like. And if you have a clear explanation of this phenomenon - please, elaborate, if you've a mind.
One reads a great deal on the Net - vis a vis this... (show quote)


It depends of the source of the noise. Stochastic (random) noise goes as the square root of the number of photons. If you double the number of pixels in a sensor and the size and basic sensor performance are unchanged, you will increase noise by 14%.

Other noise, such as amplifier or digitizer noise may change as well. Typically as the number of pixels increases, both these sources of noise will typically increase.It depends of the source of the noise. Stochastic (random) noise goes as the square root of the number of photons. If you double the number of pixels in a sensor and the size and basic sensor performance are unchanged, you will increase 14%.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.