Posts for: PeterBergh
Dec 14, 2018 18:46:16 #
KTJohnson wrote:
... I guess it could be classified as a "seascape", however, it's only a pond.
"Pondscape", to coin a word. Nice image.
Dec 14, 2018 14:03:42 #
I have found albums and loose-leaf pages for 13x19 on Amazon and am pleased with what I found.
Dec 14, 2018 09:47:51 #
ronpier wrote:
I agree. Let’s be realistic when it comes to rating these cameras. My car speedometer goes to 125 mph but the car runs much better and smoother at 70mph. So what good is a 125 mph maximum rating? No one would find that speed usable in an ordinary car. IMHO
In Germany, there's no speed limit on most of the Autobahn; thus, 125 MPH would be perfectly usable there.
Dec 13, 2018 09:20:05 #
DirtFarmer wrote:
What's wrong with the tales of us old husbands?
Old husbands don't tell tales.
Dec 12, 2018 22:09:43 #
User ID wrote:
Another simple fix.
The PDF version is machine searchable :-)
.
The PDF version is machine searchable :-)
.
Searching a PDF may help when you know a) what you are looking for and b) the manufacturer's term for it. For me, unfortunately, at least one of a) and b) applies.
Dec 12, 2018 22:00:31 #
dsmeltz wrote:
You might want to look at my earlier post (on page 9) where I discuss that very issue.
thx - I missed that.
Dec 12, 2018 09:56:24 #
dsmeltz wrote:
Motion from left to right is more pleasing. ...
This may not be true in cultures that write from right to left, such as Hebrew and Arabic.
Dec 12, 2018 09:44:34 #
The photograph is very nice; you brought out that level of detail that B/W -- when well done -- can bring to the table.
Dec 12, 2018 09:28:38 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
Did any of these work for you, Peter? 
#1 and #3 are great. To me, it's not relevant that the horses in #3 were added later. On a tangent, an image of yours that I like a lot is the branch on a very dark background; the branch looks as if it's floating on liquid with a lot of surface tension.
Dec 11, 2018 23:06:01 #
Dec 11, 2018 23:00:31 #
Dec 11, 2018 22:59:11 #
rmalarz wrote:
... The last one, definitely needs some clouds. ...
I beg to disagree. Having clouds in the image would draw attention away from the mountain -- the main subject. I do, however, think that a bit of the sky could be cropped out.
Dec 11, 2018 22:51:36 #
UTMike wrote:
Very nice place, thanks for alerting me!
You're welcome. It's a bit of a trip for you, though.
Dec 11, 2018 22:49:55 #
fergmark wrote:
I lived in Boulder through the 60's and never heard of Paint Mines Park. Too bad. Looks like a real eye opener. Shellback's information was very interesting.
Up to 1992, the park was private property. Some time between 1992 and 2018, it became a park.
Dec 11, 2018 22:47:50 #
Wanderer2 wrote:
I recently moved to Colorado and had never heard of this Park before. I've marked it on my road and recreation atlas as a place to visit, joining a rapidly growing list of places for photo ops here. I think the photos on the website are also really good. Thanks for posting this.
Glad you like the pictures. No, the park is practically unknown among photographers; on week ends, it can be quite crowded.