Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: iggy
Page: 1 2 next>>
Nov 17, 2017 13:44:52   #
The 200mm should work just fine. My Tokina 100mm works great in auto and manual focus. It's just the focus shift (stacking) feature that is disabled. Unless the body recognizes an AF-S or AF-P lens attached, the menu to activate the focus shifting is greyed-out.
Go to
Nov 16, 2017 02:41:20   #
Chris T wrote:
Iggy ... time to change your signature, then, I suspect ....
What about the Sigma EX 105 OS HSM Macro ... would that not work with your new D850?
Indeed, the signature was out of date. I'll take a look at the Sigma. It's about $400 off retail I noticed, and it appears to be compliant. I'll drop Sigma a line. Thanks!
Go to
Nov 16, 2017 01:18:14   #
I received my new D850 today (ordered directly from Nikon on Oct 8th, for those tracking the delivery times), and was excited to try out the new Focus Shift feature with my trusted Tokina 100mm. Unfortunately, the D850 will not allow that particular lens to access the Focus Shift feature. The manual indicates only AF-S and AF-P lenses will work, and it does work just fine with a variety of my Nikon and Tamron lens.

But, I only have one macro lens, which is the Tokina. It works superbly with the D850, just not with the new stacking feature. So, before I jump the gun and purchase a replacement macro lens, I'm curious if anyone has found a work-around?

Based on the info in the manual, the Nikkor 200mm f/4 D may not work either. So, I'm probably left with the Nikkor 105mm - budget wise, anyway.

Anyone tried focus shift with a non- AF-S or AF-P lens with success? I suspect Nikon is relying on the internal lens motor for a precise shift from image to image. But, it doesn't hurt to ask.

Thanks.
Go to
Nov 15, 2017 09:20:08   #
dhultsman wrote:
I ALWAYS carry receipts for every piece of photography gear when travelling from the US to Canada or Mexico by car. I have been asked more than once for proof of ownership and it can happen both going or returning.


Might be a good use for Fro Knows Foto’s MyGearVault app. I just downloaded it yesterday. It tracks all your gear, including receipts, all on your smartphone. The app appears to be free. They make their money on optional insurance.
Go to
Nov 14, 2017 14:47:58   #
Kfallsfotoman wrote:
As a old film user I tend to keep 90% of what I shoot. I do cull out the obvious useless files (totally black, blown out, accidental shots of my foot etc.)
But I don't et lightroom manage it - I understand all their catalogue system can do - which is more than I want or need for my non-pro work. Also most of the issues I hear with Lightroom have something to do with the catalogue (I'm in a few lightroom FB groups)

I use Nikon Transfer to transfer my files from the SD card, create a folder, and rename the files.
Once they are transferred I normally cull out shots - then separate raw files into a sub folder. (I setup to shoot raw and jpeg of same shot).

When I'm ready to edit - if necessary -I open lightroom and just import the raw's I want to edit.
This works for ME - since some of the events I shoot I only need SOOC jpegs.

At some point I move folders from my I internal working drive to external backup drives based on the type of shoot (family, events, my passion work etc.)

This would probably be too labor intensive for a commercial, wedding, or portrait photog - but it works for me.
I can easily find image I shot years ago
As a old film user I tend to keep 90% of what I sh... (show quote)


The advantage I see with managing the files/folders yourself, vs using Lightroom, is you won't go through what I went through when Apple ditched Aperture. I preferred Aperture's photo management to Lightroom, but made the move when Apple announced they were abandoning the product. Now that I've moved to LR, and observing Adobe play games with CC / Classic, it may only be a matter of time when I'm forced to seek another software solution for the management my images. I think I'll go to system files and folders next time. Thanks.
Go to
Nov 14, 2017 13:55:11   #
Thanks everyone for your input. You've been a great help.
Go to
Nov 14, 2017 13:15:45   #
Way back when I purchased my first digital camera, I followed a recommendation to keep every image; no matter how blurry, bad, dark, or blown-out. Storage is cheap, and you never know when you might need one of those old images. Well, I've never really needed any of those images (yet). Today, I still keep everything. However, my shooting volume is beginning to outpace my storage growth, so I'm considering dumping the low quality shots, at least moving forward. Especially, considering my new d850 I'm getting tomorrow stores (up to) 100mb images. If my math is correct, and I shoot and keep 100 shots, I'll need 10gb to store it. For me, that's going to be about 75gb to 100gb per week.

I currently have everything in LR, and none of it is archived (or whatever the nomenclature is for offline storage in LR). Cataloging (sic) photos with images stored somewhere else (offline, but physically available) is something worth considering. I'm not a proponent of using the cloud for my primary method of storage, for at least 100 reasons. So, I keep everything (except backups of course) in-house.

I'm curious what you keep. I do understand this is a personal decision that depends on my particular circumstances - so please hold off on that lecture. As I make my decision moving forward, I'd like to include the perspective of others.


Thanks for your time.
Go to
Nov 14, 2017 10:05:24   #
Are you sure you didn't accidentally apply a filter from a program like Photoshop? The second one looks similar to Photoshop's half-tone distort filter.
Go to
Nov 13, 2017 11:39:15   #
How about a feature that tracks your eye, then maintains focus on the same point in the viewfinder you are focusing on. Would be great for action sports and birds in flight. As long as you are looking at the bird's eye, the camera maintains focus on that point. The technology exists, it would just need to be made a bit more precise with quicker response.
Go to
Nov 13, 2017 09:49:12   #
Great photos.

Is there any particular time of the day you are likely to capture shots with the greatest amount of reflection?
Go to
Nov 13, 2017 04:35:31   #
Chris T wrote:
Oh, okay, Iggy ....

Post something here, after you get it ... so we can all see ... will you?



Promise, I will. The focus stacking feature, as Nikon calls it, is the first thing I plan on testing. I can’t wait. I should get my camera by Friday.
Go to
Nov 13, 2017 04:00:12   #
MalcolmZ wrote:
Chris T:

I think that I'd like a camera that would automatically take a series of photos with different foci so they can be combined to make a picture with tremendous depth of focus.


I'll test that feature out on the d850 I expect to receive this week.
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 22:32:58   #
Chris T wrote:
Iggy ... many of my cameras allow you to reprogram many of the buttons via the menu system, and make them whatever you want. The Pentax K-50 I have allows that, and so do several of my Sony alphas. Also, there are USER settings on the dials of many cameras (the K-5 II has 3 or 4!) which allow you to set up various programs, all with your own specific settings. Check them out ... you might find what you want, already exists!!!!

Iggy ... many of my cameras allow you to reprogram... (show quote)


I have mine all reprogrammed. What I want is more buttons to program, and have a few of them right next to each other. I tend to over-customize things, especially when my OCD kicks in. I'm sure if they gave me five buttons, I'd probably want eight.
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 19:16:20   #
My tripod (as many do) has a leg that twists off and converts to a monopod, so I have have in the field. If I need to be extra still, I use the tripod, otherwise, I find the mono easier to manage. It also takes some of the stress (weight) off with heavier lenses.
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 19:11:07   #
I'd like to see an array, maybe of three, buttons located about where the ae/af lock is on the d750, all of which can be programmed to my liking. With the d750, there are three buttons I can program, but they're all over the camera. I want a few in one area, then I can simply move my thumb a bit to the left or right. But, keep the two programmables on the front as well. This will give me a total of five buttons.
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.