E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
You have done it before so now you are gonna do it again.
You have made the preparations and all your gear is good to go.
I usually work with an assistant but not necessarily a second shooter. Since I usually employ multiple flashes, even on many of the candid shots, my assistant is my mobile light stand and he or she can anticipate my shots and place the light quickly and accordingly. On a smaller job, I sometimes work solo and place a few lights around the venue on stationary stands.
If you are not using multiple lights or only on limited shots such as the formals, your yet untrained assistant can just be a helpful extra set of hands. You can't fully train someone in a few hours and "laying down the law" is not the best approach. I like to think that most folks who volunteer want to be helpful, creative and have the intelligence to do so. In a case like yours, on this job, I would assume that I am gonna do just about every myself and any additional help will be appreciated.
On a small or medium size wedding in a barn (a nice informal venue), you do not need a second shooter to make hundreds of useless images. You know how to be at the right place at the right time to catch all of the action. Being able to anticipate the action is the trick that comes with your experience.
On a solo shoot, my approach is easy. You can not be in two places at the same time so the client has to help you apportion your time. If the couple will NOT see each other before the ceremony, be sure to get in early and arrange to shoot the bride, here folks and the female bridal party BEFORE the ceremony- shoot her portraits at that time. This means you will need to assemble that gang about an hour and a half before the ceremony. If there is time, shoot the groom, his folks and guys in advance. If they are all on-site, you can pull that off.
IF HOWEVER, the couple will get together before the ceremony, I gather the enter group 3 hours before the ceremony and shoot all of the formals and preparation shots, then I can be free to short all of the photojournalistic shots without bothering anyone or causing any delays. If I can secure this kind of cooperation it is great, everyone is fresh and sober before the ceremony and in exchange, they get 100% free celebration time.
Otherwise, you will need an interlude just after the ceremony, before the reception or party to shoot the combined portraits and groups- perhaps an hour.
You needn't worry about your one-time assistant but you have to work out a strict schedule with the bride, groom and their bridal party and parents etc. As you know, once a wedding gets going, there is a trajectory. If there's not a set plan as to when some form shots and groups can be done, you will end up running around the place like a headless chicken all day!
This all assumes the clients do want some formal or casual formals. If they want complete photojournalistic coverage, that's OK but I usually advise my clients against that. I explain that elegant and flattering images do not materialize by magic and I need THEIR cooperation. I also promise, if I am free to concentrate on the photojournalistic part of the coverage, I will deliver many strictly unposed, candid, fun, and impromptu shots.
Shoot lots, shoot fast, and shoot carefully!
You have done it before so now you are gonna do it... (
show quote)
Such a wise seasoned photographer you are Ed. My thought on the one time assistant was to use her to catch shots from different angles and heights rather than just follow me around. For example maybe the barn has a loft and she can position there while I am on ground level. She would definitely be more value as an assistant during the formals, possible sunset shots, etc... As you know, the worst thing about "other" shooters during the formals is that they steal the eyes of the wedding party. Good idea regarding doing the formals early.