Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Bill Hancock
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 30 next>>
Apr 19, 2024 19:00:32   #
Follow the light.


(Download)
Go to
Apr 18, 2024 15:28:33   #
I don't think so.
Go to
Apr 18, 2024 07:15:45   #
Amazing shots Jack!
Go to
Mar 30, 2024 20:32:41   #
Longing!


(Download)
Go to
Mar 29, 2024 17:40:00   #
Go to
Mar 29, 2024 17:33:41   #
Nicely done.
Go to
Mar 29, 2024 17:30:08   #
Very nice.
Go to
Mar 28, 2024 15:05:59   #
It looks like you're having fun. I think that is the best thing about AI is having fun. Being able to transfer the images of the imagination to visible images is satisfying. Artists are able to do that. Personally, I can't draw a straight line, but I can do things with AI that I can't do with a pencil or a paint brush.
Go to
Mar 28, 2024 14:35:53   #
Very nice image!
Go to
Mar 28, 2024 13:24:14   #
That's a good one!
Go to
Mar 25, 2024 12:39:52   #
terryMc wrote:
Even Adobe will acknowledge that Generative Fill/Firefly is not as advanced as other AI generators which are trained by scraping the web for every image, whether copyrighted or not. Instead, they only use images they have rights to, and even that has caused controversy. I believe that the original plan was to have a certain number of credits issued to subscribers to different plans, and then after January, you would be charged for going over your limit. That deadline was then moved to March and is currently still not being enforced. I suspect that is due to the poor performance.

I use Generative Fill in Photoshop for removing unwanted objects in photographs, and for that, it works pretty well, if not perfectly. If you want to generate a complete image from scratch, there are better engines than Firefly. I personally have no interest in AI-generated images which cannot even be copyrighted.
Even Adobe will acknowledge that Generative Fill/F... (show quote)


Don't get me wrong. I like Adobe Photoshop and have been using it since the 1980's. Creative Fill/Firefly does very well on touching up actual photographs. I even use it to add to the images Bing generates, but as a stand-a-lone AI image generator, it has a long way to go. AI is still a very new technology and there are a lot of uncertainties concerning its use. I personally don't care about getting anything AI generated copyrighted. I use it for personal satisfaction in generating something that I like to look at. It occupies this 80 year old brain and keeps it active. Have fun!
Go to
Mar 25, 2024 09:29:15   #
R.G. wrote:
Would I be right in thinking that in the Adobe image the bird is closer to the original, as in using your bird image instead of generating one from scratch using AI?


If I understand your question correctly, both are AI images. The Adobe image is very poor in my opinion and the Bing image is more natural and is closer to looking like an actual photograph. I used the same command in both images. "Cardinal bird sitting on a small tree limb with snowy background."
Go to
Mar 25, 2024 08:38:43   #
dpullum wrote:
"The first one is with Generative Fill and the second one is with Bing."
Same words used to generate both images???


Yes.
Go to
Mar 25, 2024 07:17:55   #
Curmudgeon did an image of ducks and an otter with Generative Fill. I have used Generative Fill for a long time and just recently got introduced to Bing. Here is a couple of images, one with Generative Fill and one with Bing. There is a big difference. The first one is with Generative Fill and the second one if with Bing.




(Download)
Go to
Mar 25, 2024 06:51:13   #
Curmudgeon wrote:
I hadn't tried Generative Fill that way. Probably won't again unless it improves


I used Generative Fill a lot and some things were good, but I was never satisfied with biological life. I still use it some, but bing does a lot better. Generative Fill has a long way to go to catch up. I like your image.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 30 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.