Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Heather Iles
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 107 next>>
Mar 31, 2024 15:50:10   #
No. 1. It looks sophisticated.
Go to
Mar 31, 2024 15:46:37   #
Harvey wrote:
I live in a mountain community mostly consisting of retired people 20= miles from Jackson, CA- we are fortunate to have a variety of small businesses that make it convenient to not have to drive 20+ miles down to Jackson for any major shopping. One of those businesses is a small but good grocery store with all the thing of a larger supermarket
- good meat, produce, deli Items not carried by Dollar G. - Well a couple years ago Dollar G came up with a deal to take over the lease on the building of the grocery store- the areas population screamed blood murder - got petition and stopped the take over - well Dollar G bought a lot across the road built a building and was quoted of saying "they were going to run the grocery store out of business - as I said we are in a mountain community 3,500 ft elevation it is known as "the snow line" we get some snow 4 to 10 inches mostly but every year or so 18 to 24 comes in and dew to this being CA some times it is quite wet and heavy OK Dollar G is cheap on everything so the must have been cheap on their building as on our first snow fall this year it was heavy and deep 30 inches on my driveway. This was too much for the new Dollar G store as the roof caved in, destroying the building - no word of them rebuilding.
I live in a mountain community mostly consisting o... (show quote)


This made me laugh out loud. Serves them right, I say!
Go to
Mar 12, 2024 14:59:02   #
Ah, it is good to have a sense of humour!
Go to
Mar 12, 2024 14:57:04   #
Harry02 wrote:
Every other year I buy the pair- Photoshop Elements and Premier elements.
Somewhere between Turkey Day and Valentines. Both for under $100.


Thanks for posting. It just makes people aware to keep their eyes out for offers and sooner or later a good price will come along to suit them.
Go to
Mar 11, 2024 18:57:02   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
The best subscriptions are to those things you cannot buy.


Too true.
Go to
Mar 11, 2024 18:54:19   #
Voss wrote:
Thanks, Heather. It was taken last August in Houston, so it probably was VERY hot (and muggy).


Thanks, Voss. I wouldn't know how hot it gets there as I have never been there.

"Muggy". A very English word and a good description.
Go to
Mar 11, 2024 07:30:16   #
Well spotted!

It seems the temperature was in the 90's. Where was the place?
Go to
Mar 10, 2024 14:00:10   #
burkphoto wrote:
I love that attitude! I'm much the same, as I buy phones and computers I use daily for many tasks. I operate on a five to seven year cycle with each. That assures me there will be enough change to provide a good performance boost when I upgrade, and that they will remain safe on the Internet. Support for anti-malware software generally wanes after five years, along with support for operating systems upgrades.


I am pleased that you took my response as it was meant.

Have a good day.

H
Go to
Mar 10, 2024 03:43:00   #
burkphoto wrote:
Debating subscription vs version license is six of one, half dozen of the other, IF you believe in staying current with software. I actually get more satisfaction out of trying new tools than in saving money. I worked hard, invested well, and enjoy the fruits of my labor. It's a hobby, now, and a part time business when I feel like it. But it's worth it to me to keep learning.

OTOH, professionals and businesses prefer the subscription model for its predictability. Before the subscription schemes, a business like the one I worked for would spend $40,000 to set up a department for photo retouching. 18 months later, a new version of Photoshop came along. We didn't upgrade, because it was several hundred dollars per seat. The lab across town did. Five of our best people left to go work there. Three years later, we finally upgraded, to the third version since the one we bought. It was a disaster, because we had to retrain everyone in the department. Three versions of Photoshop back then was an absurd amount of change!

With subscriptions, that does not happen. Everyone is current with their software and their knowledge. You do have to plan for computer and OS upgrades, but that's usually on a 3 to 5 year cycle in corporate production environments anyway.

If you don't care whether you use the latest software, then buying a package and "holding it 'til your hard drive crashes" (not literally!) can be economical. But if you're 80 and that happens, are you going to want to learn a new package on a new computer? Some will, some won't. But good luck getting the old software to run on a new system, even if you have the license key and the installer files. It's a lot easier when the software is updated each quarter and you get a steady drip feed of new features.
Debating subscription vs version license is six of... (show quote)


Ah, Bill

You "hit the nail on the head so to speak". It is six of one and half a dozen of the other.

Regarding waiting until our equipment can't cope with the latest software, not in my case. I was a legal secretary and was used to up-to-date equipment.

I use a computer technician to service my PC and Laptop and as soon as they need changing after several small repairs he informs me that it is time I change and get the latest and the fastest that is suitable for my needs.

I don't just use my equipment for photography. I do most of my shopping, keeping in touch with friends and surfing the web, whereas my photographic programs are only used occasionally, so I am no old fuddy-duddy and keep on top of the latest technology.

In fact, as we are living longer we are not old until we are 100 these days, so I have 25 years to go yet.

Have a good day,

H
Go to
Mar 9, 2024 18:55:16   #
Linda From Maine wrote:
Thanks, but "mentally sharp" isn't usually my default mode now that I'm nearing the middle of my seventh decade on earth.

I do have some good days, however 🥰


I think that applies to most of us on here, Linda. At least we still have a brain.
Go to
Mar 9, 2024 18:52:06   #
Linda From Maine wrote:
See the "Upgrade now" link on the screenprint below; it's from the Adobe Website. Several comments made in this thread (by several users) could have been easily verified or clarified by utilizing the awesome powers of Mr. Google



Well done, Linda. That price is even better than the price I saw.
Go to
Mar 9, 2024 18:40:07   #
burkphoto wrote:
Adobe's sales actually went way up when they switched to the subscription model. $10/month is a lot more affordable from a cash flow standpoint than plunking down hundreds for a standalone package. It adds up over time, sure, but you don't take the hit all at once, or incur interest if you put it on a credit card.

Frankly, the best feature of the subscription model is the continuous improvement of the software.


You are a wise knowledgeable manburkphoto and there is no disputing your theory/views.

It could also be said that the program makers only drip feed us every year with small improvements to their programs, so there isn't much benefit to the hobbyist who is only going to use the program from time to time and hasn't got to rely on it for their living. Those hobbyists only upgrade when it suits them.

It is known that a subscription is also more beneficial to the masses that are short of money whereas the others that can afford it will do the same without thinking about the cost. Most people especially those short of money have not worked out what it is costing them per year. I could give examples of that as I know people who have slot meters to use their household gas and electricity (UK)in their homes and are paying more than those who pay by direct debit where the company takes the money automatically via their bank account. I told a lady who I know last week that it works out more expensive using a slot meter, but she told me it was better for her as she could budget better. I didn't continue the conversation further. My thoughts were the poor get poorer without them realising and they wonder why they are.
Go to
Mar 9, 2024 18:17:19   #
PhotogHobbyist wrote:
By in the past, I meant past years. My last purchase was for PSE 2019 which brought me up from 2015. I have not seen PSE advertised as an upgrade for less than $79.99. Also, I did not see 2023 for a discounted price at all, that's why I was looking now. I did download a trial of it and it has a very different look from 2015.


I assume it is called marketing. One way companies get us to purchase their products. You only get that price if you try to open your old version. My version is 11 which is 8 years older than your 2019, so I assume that could be why it triggered the discount. I haven't downloaded the 2024 version yet so will see if it will trigger the advert for the reduction again when I try to open my Elements 11. If it does, I will post the photo here.
Go to
Mar 9, 2024 12:20:57   #
Ah, yes, but that price is for Elements 24 which is present. Adobe is smart.
Go to
Mar 9, 2024 12:19:07   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Whenever your software forces you to an 8-bit file, you might as well as have captured the image as JPEG in the camera. Facts are facts. period.


No arguing about that.

As an experiment, I would like you please to have a look at my latest photograph taken with my mobile phone which was an I-phone 12 PRO MAX. I will not attach it here as it will annoy some members. It is posted in the Mobile Phone Photography section for those who are interested.

It was posted there as a challenge to anyone who could show me how to improve the photo before it was entered into a competition. but there weren't many takers.

I will send it to you in a Private Message on here.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 107 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.