Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: N4646W
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 29 next>>
Dec 24, 2019 02:09:26   #
One quick way, is to slide the print head out of its park position at least half way out on the print platen. Unplug the printer, wait a few minutes, then press the power on switch. If the print head does not move you are safe to proceed. If it does move back towards the park position but does not park, slide it back to where you started, and press the power on switch again. If no movement, you are safe to proceed with the following. Fold a paper towel in half, saturate the fold with a non foaming window cleaner that has ammonia. Slide the print head out of the way so that you can place the folded edge on the printing portion of the platen, and then carefully slide the print head over the folded paper towel. Since you have done multiple cleanings this may take a couple of hours to set in this position. Close the lid so that the towel does not dry out, as this will make your clogs worse. Keep checking the towel every so often by sliding the print head off, to make sure it is not dry. You should see inks on the towel when you slide the head off of it. If not, double the fold thickness and repeat until you see ink. Do not force the print head over the paper towel. Once you have done this,(seeing ink on the towel) and let it set for an hour or two, making sure the towel is wet, replace the soiled towel with a fresh towel soaked in cleaner again, for another hour or two. After this is done, assuming you now have ink flowing onto the towel, dry and clean the print platen, fold a dry towel to the same thickness and slide the print head over it to remove any ink that is on the head it self, until you get a clean towel. While this is being done, inspect the parking tray for the print head. You should see a small O ring around the perimeter, and using Q tips with window cleaner, clean it. Don't try to clean the screen within with the Q tip. If you have a syringe, you can saturate both the park screen and the cleaning screens by saturating them with window cleaner. Once everything is cleaned, plug the print power cord back in, turn on the power, let the printer cycle, do a quick clean. This should make sure there is no air bubbles in the lines, and now try a print pattern check. For my Epson printers it works 90% of the time, then it's time for a power clean.

Yes, empty cartridges filled with warm water and a few drops of windex is another way to do this. But, and this is the tricky part, you have to first remove the ink lines from the print head and make sure they are absolutely clean. If not, this method will break up the sediment in the lines and force it into the dampners and print head. Then it's good by print head. If you use this method, I suggest that you remove the disposal tray, remove its grid, remove the felt absorption pads, refill it with some old rags, put the grid back on, and go to it. This is the method I have adopted for the old printers I have adopted. So far, out of the seven 9000 series printers, I have had to replace only one print head. Took me two months of soaking and flushing to get it cleaned, so now I have a spare.

Ron
Go to
Dec 20, 2019 02:24:31   #
toxdoc42 wrote:
I am well aware of the arguments regarding UV/clear filters to protect a lens. I don't want to jinx myself, but I have been involved with photography for over 60 years and have never had a cracked, scratched, or other form of damaged from of a lens. So you can understand that I am biased by the fact that even the most expensive filters, and who says that they are necessarily better than the least expensive ones, are placing another piece of glass in front of the lens that I prefer to use to take a photo. I checked with my personal property insurance carrier and they told me that damage from dropping a lens, etc., will be covered by them as well.

I am going on a safari in February and was told, by many, that it is very dusty and to carry 2 camera bodies so I don't need to change lenses. I bought a second body. Now I was told to wrap the camera and lens in a scarf when not shooting, so I got a bit worried about sand, dust, etc., sand blasting the front of the lens.

I started listening to u-tubes about the discussion of filters and various people's discussions about quality and price. When looking for a UV/clear glass filter I noticed that Tiffen, which was really a leader in filter manufacturing in the 1960s, still seems to have filters for sale, at this time. I found some of my old Tiffen filters from the 1960s and they look just great. They new Tiffen filters are far less expensive then other manufacturers' brands. I was surprised to find that they actually claim they make their filters in the USA. I took the chance and ordered one for my lower and one for my upper zoom lenses. I have polaroid filters for other lenses that I will be taking as well, so all of my lenses should be protected.

I just wondered if anyone has had any good or bad experiences with their filters?
I am well aware of the arguments regarding UV/clea... (show quote)


Tiffen I believe used to make 3 grades of filter. The less expensive was an unanodized ring, an excellent glass, and their top line glass. When I bought their top line glass, it was usually within the same price range as Hoya and Nikon. I saw a discussion on filters back in 2000, and Tiffen was rated slightly under Hoya, because of the sticky non anodized screw rings. As far as affecting image quality, on prime lenses at 300% I can tell a difference. On zoom lenses, it depends on the zoom of the lenses. Some will not tolerate a filter on the low end, others on the upper end, you just have to be aware of the lens. But this is still pixel peeping at over 100%. Also with their top glass as with Hoya and Nikkon they have a beefier ring. I use Tiffen, Hoya, and Nikon filters, the biggest I believe is 140mm for my Nikkor 400 and 600mm Q lenses. Now those really hurt your spare change. Also I believe if you check the Hoya web site, they have different grades of filters.

Ron
Go to
Dec 7, 2019 18:08:43   #
Wow, that series brings back a lot of memories. Some even before there was a bridge. I really can't be that old, can I?

Long before the bridge, it was a biker hang out. Some interesting times there.

Ron
Go to
Dec 4, 2019 18:53:00   #
Do a search for the "Norton Removal Tool". Otherwise it is going to leave a lot of crap behind which will still use system resources and nag screens popping up from time to time.

An excellent AV is Bitdefender. Runs without hiccups with windows defender and router firewalls.

Ron
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 11:15:53   #
Will this work?


(Download)
Go to
Nov 30, 2019 15:36:18   #
Check your fusion rollers, and make sure printer is level. You may be able to clean the rollers, or see if that end of the rollers is disintegrating.

Ron
Go to
Nov 5, 2019 23:29:07   #
In the Photo Persona it is just above the magnifier in the tool panel (bottom of tool bar). The Perspective Tool.

Ron
Go to
Oct 29, 2019 14:30:34   #
mwsilvers wrote:
I didn't do it to extol the virtues of PhotoLab or as a criticism of the Develop persona. I'm not sure what his purpose was in displaying that dark and murky image, but I wanted to show him some of the possibilities for recovery. I didn't spend much time on it and I did indicate he could achieve something similar using the Develop and Photo personas.

By the way, I spent almost a month with the current version of Affinity on three different computers, with much of that time spent with the Develop Persona, trying to get the best from it. I did the same thing with a previous version. One of the joys of being a retired software developer is having the time to do this. I take my reviews of software very seriously and spend a lot of time learning the nuances before I feel competent enough to make any comments or recommendations.

I'm pretty confident I know Develop's capabilities. I'm a quick study when it comes to learning new software. Unfortunately I no longer have a copy of Affinity available, but will shortly sign up for another free trial using my wife's desktop this time. Develop is certainly not bad at what it does do, but it's the functional limitations and missing features that hamper it. I have to disagree with you about it being an "exceptionally strong raw processor". What are you comparing it against? I do have substantially more prior experience with Lightroom, Capture One Pro, ON1 and PhotoLab. I own, and use, the most current version of all of them except Lightroom. I stopped using Adobe products a while back.
I didn't do it to extol the virtues of PhotoLab o... (show quote)


I apologize if I came across as confrontational. I too have a lot of the software you have listed, and tried every one that has a trial, but when I tried the Beta version of Affinity for windows I was intrigued. After the release of the official Windows version I have not upgraded any of my other software. My basic processing software is still NX-2, and I'm still learning all it is capable of. As far as Affinity goes, I won't be around long enough to explore all of its capabilities.

Ron
Go to
Oct 29, 2019 03:05:27   #
mwsilvers wrote:
I hope you don't mind, but just to give you an idea of the possibilities with this difficult image, I took the liberty of running your jpeg through DXO PhotoLab Elite. While it's a non-destructive raw processor, unlike the Develop persona PhotoLab also processes jpegs and tiffs non-destructively and has a lot more adjustment options so I had no need for a back end pixel editor like the Photo persona. The results would have been much better if I had had the original raw file or a even a higher resolution jpeg, but I thought you might find it interesting.

It took two or three minutes to lift details, brighten the colors and add micro contrast, sharpness and a little noise reduction along with some targeted local adjustments. Try to compare them at full resolution side by side. If you are not yet very familiar with Affinity you could have gotten a close approximation using both the Develop and Photo personas.
I hope you don't mind, but just to give you an ide... (show quote)


Why spend the time? If we are going to get so off topic, one click in NX-2 will do the same or better with the jpeg the OP posted, a total of maybe 15 sec. The OP asked a specific question about Affinity, not DXO, ON-1, ect, ect. If you are an Affinity user, and you have played with it, it is an exceptionally strong raw processor. I"m still learning things that it will do that are not obvious. But, you have to learn how to make it work. It is not as simpalistic as the sliders in LR or DXO, but if you are willing to learn you can do what you do in other programs, maybe even better and with more precision.
Go to
Oct 28, 2019 15:58:53   #
camerapapi wrote:
It is for me a habit to edit RAW data with Nikon proprietary software. Then I go to Affinity and edit some more if needed.
When I go to a professional lab I am confident that the colors I saw will be faithfully represented in the print.


or your cameras software.
Go to
Oct 28, 2019 14:49:43   #
Affinity states that the develop module is destructive in the help menu and on the tutorials...

However, if you go into the properties of the program, you can strip out all the Affinity presets (for any or all modules) for the develop module, leaving you with the raw file as imported or as close to the original file as Affinity can interpret, as it is with any other software that you use to develop. Process the file as is and you are taken into the next module,Photo Persona. Go to layers, and duplicate the layer. Then turn off the Base layer and bring the second (new) layer into the develop module process as desired, and you are taken back into the Photo persona to continue to your hearts desire. Before you start changing things, you can switch back and forth between the layers to see if your development made the changes you anticipated. If not, turn off the Base layer, and take the new layer back to the develop module.

When you are done, "Save" the Affinity file with "all" layers, and then you can Export to your desired format. Now you can go back to the saved Affinity file and "all" your layers are there including the initial raw.

Ron
Go to
Oct 27, 2019 13:24:28   #
Go to File , Export. You will be presented with a window with multiple export types.

Ron
Go to
Oct 26, 2019 03:29:02   #
DaveyDitzer wrote:
800 mm f5.6 Nikon on their site lists at $16,300. Can't imagine a Nikon lens at $25M unless it's some old rare model.


If I recall, it might have been the old Q series that Nikon made that were also used also on the Bronica's. The 400mm and 600mm lenses that I have weigh in the neighbor hood of 19 lbs each. They also made an 800mm, 1000mm and 1200mm. Have seen the 1000mm f4.5 at $20K on average for one that shows an extreme amount of external wear. I have seen the 1200mm f4.5 and f5.6 only in articles. Mine are fun to use, but the focus ring is really, really critical.

Ron
Go to
Oct 10, 2019 13:31:53   #
Rongnongno wrote:
I just do not know what.

First:
1) the focus is slightly off
2) the aperture is too small resulting into a too short (narrow) depth of field
Both 1 and 2 can be corrected using stacking.

You may consider that the format ratio is off but that is a choice so not an issue.

There is something else that makes me question the whole image but I cannot pin point it.

.


This puzzled me for a while until I took a long look at the overall effect of the center flower. It looks more like a demon monster flower. Clone out what looks like a demonic eye to the right of center.

Ron
Go to
Sep 13, 2019 16:41:58   #
sheebe wrote:
Ah, what lens? not till you buy me a new Tamron SP


Hrummph! Younger generation has no appreciation for older glass.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 29 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.