Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: LarryFB
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 43 next>>
Nov 15, 2023 21:57:30   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
If you trust this brand new camera has all the kinks worked out and you'll never experience a warranty-covered issue, nor need a repair during your ownership of the body, save some money on the international grey-market version. If you need the peace of mind (aka insurance) again a warranty-covered issue or repair, get the properly authorized US-market version.


Go to
Oct 16, 2023 15:40:30   #
If you are steady, burst mode can be used for shooting panoramas. You have to be steady but it can be done in a pinch. Needless to say using a tripod and manual mode is better.
Go to
Mar 22, 2023 12:58:49   #
billmck wrote:
Apple’s operating system includes a backup program called Time Machine. Check it out before you buy something.

Bill


And it works great!
Go to
Mar 16, 2023 20:20:43   #
jaymatt wrote:
This is a holdup!

Taken at Custer State Park, 2017.


A great photo of the Begging Burros!
Go to
Feb 20, 2023 14:15:58   #
PHRubin wrote:
From where I sit, you've done very well.


Go to
Jul 11, 2022 11:14:17   #
Great Pictures. Have you ever seen a C-130 use JATO bottles? Part way down the take off run, the JATO bottles are fired. Then the C-130 takes off at about a 40 degree angle. Then at a few hundred feet of altitude it levels off. The Blue Angels used to do this during some of their exhibitions. It is an awesome sight. They quit doing it because they ran out of JATO bottles. I've seen the Blues fly about a half of dozen time but only once did I see Fat Albert take off with JATO assist.
Go to
Dec 18, 2021 14:12:27   #
PSD is a Photoshop format, most printers will not be able to print it. JPG is much more universal and probably all printers will require it.
Go to
Nov 11, 2021 11:14:15   #
Mustanger wrote:
I can't figure it out ...? Why? Do you know?


According to iBirdPro, "The Acorn Woodpecker stores nuts in individually drilled holes in trees calledd granaries. The acorns are jammed in so tight that even squirrels can't pry them out."
Go to
Oct 1, 2021 18:40:25   #
Timothy S wrote:
This question is simply to see what thoughts are out there on the equipment that I am using vs the level of photography that I want to strive for. I am in the difficult position of being a photographer on a budget. I don’t have a bunch of money to work with, but at the same time after only a couple years I have won a good number of awards and was told by the gallery owner where my work is that I have been more successful than any other photographer at the shop. I am first of all confused about my identity, as I have taken no formal photography courses and as a business have not had a year in the black. The definition of “professional” seems very vague. But my main question is concerning my Canon EOS Rebel t7i. I still love it that so-called “entry level” camera. It does everything I want in a very light and simple format, and I get great results. But I tend to be hesitant to display what equipment I use when posting on elite sites such as NANPA where the best “professional” grade equipment is proudly displayed. But to me, the label of equipment levels (entry level,?enthusiast, professional) has little to do with image quality. I understand that full frame could produce improved results with enlarged images and low light, but I mostly do wildlife, so I like the crop advantage for distance. By the way, I purchased all of my more expensive equipment as used in excellent condition on eBay and have never been disappointed. Some lenses are older versions, such as my Canon 100mm macro and my work horse, the Canon EF 100–400 mm f/4.5–5.6L IS USM I. Thoughts?
This question is simply to see what thoughts are o... (show quote)


I'm sure someone else will also made this same comment, "good photographs are made by the photographer, not the camera!"
Go to
Sep 29, 2021 14:37:09   #
50 years ago I had the same issue with an SRT-101 and took it to a Minolta Repair Shop. The Tech held down the shutter release button (the one you press to take a picture) and moved the film advance lever. It worked like a champ after that.

It was a five hour drive round trip and my total time in the shop was about 5 minutes! BUT I was very happy.
Go to
Sep 9, 2021 16:23:55   #
Looks like it was a wonderful evening. Happy New Year (I don't know Hebrew!)
Go to
Aug 31, 2021 19:35:34   #
MaryFran wrote:
I have a photo on my computer that measures 6000 X 4000, size 10.2 MB. The same photo when transferred to either a travel drive or to my solid state external hard drive, only measures 1024 X 683, size 262KB. When I move the photo back to my computer, first to the desk top and then share it to Photo, it is only 1024 X 683, size 262 KB. Does anybody know why it does this? Why doesn't it come back to its original size? I don't want to move anything off the computer if this is what is going to happen to the photos. How is that change going to affect photos that I want to make into notecards later? I can't keep everything on the computer. Thanks.
I have a photo on my computer that measures 6000 X... (show quote)


More information is needed. How are you transferring the photo? That info would really help!
Go to
Aug 27, 2021 16:16:21   #
If you made any changes to your photos in Lightroom they will no longer be available to new software unless you export those images from Lightroom.

To attempt to make this more clear. Lightroom DOES NOT change any photo in its Library. It does keep a record of what changes you made to the photo. But this record is only directions for Lightroom to use. So, you will always have the original photos that you "imported into Lightroom" and you can open those photos with any appropriate software. However, they will not have any of the changes you made in Lightroom (lighten, darken, or crop).

You may be able to EXPORT the edited version. But I'm not positive.
Go to
Aug 3, 2021 14:36:46   #
smussler wrote:
I doubt it. Haven't seen a consensus on here about anything. A good walk around lens I imagine differs depending on where you like to walk and what you like to photograph, and probably the camera - Full Frame, Cropped Sensor or other sizes. If one has a lens that stays on their camera 85% of the time, I'd say one would think that a good walk around lens. For me it's my 18-140mm.


I agree. I typically have an 18-140mm lens on my camera. However, if I'm specifically looking for birds it will be a longer lens, if I'm after interior shots it will probably me my 10-20mm. Having said that my 18-140mm is probably on my camera 90% of the time.

Go to
Jun 15, 2021 12:46:15   #
Curmudgeon wrote:
That is really too bad. Yosemite NP is not a photo op Yosemite is a living, changing, magic place that can only be experienced in person. If you are going only to take pictures and check off a place on your bucket list don't waste your time. You'll only get in the way of people who are there because Yosemite is like no other place on earth.


All I can say is:
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 43 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.