Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: HOHIMER
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 64 next>>
Oct 24, 2023 05:33:59   #
My theory has always been: Our universe is but an atom in someone’s table leg.
Go to
Sep 26, 2023 09:25:14   #
jerryc41- "Of course! Once you deposit your money it becomes their money."

My mattress never says that!
Go to
Sep 25, 2023 16:28:43   #
markngolf wrote:
I have 4 Chase credit cards. They like me and provide great customer service when needed. My cards are paid automatically every month. I have an 840 credit rating. I seldom pay cash when purchasing. I would never attempt reading "change of terms". I don't need to know that to pay my bill at the grocery store. I try to keep it simple.
Mark


Several years ago, I withdrew all my money from Chase Bank, when the manager implied my deposit was not my money but an investment in the operation of his bank!
Read those terms carefully!
Go to
Sep 23, 2023 07:58:18   #
jerryc41 wrote:
One of the snow globes I made at the beginning of the year now has black water. The second one is getting dark. I used distilled water, but I guess that wasn't being cautious enough. I'll have to rethink my plan to start snow globe production.

If I make another one, it will be dry inside. It will look the same, but there won't be any little bits floating around when It's shaken.


So, it will not be a snow globe.
Go to
Sep 23, 2023 06:24:17   #
https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2023/08/barry-webb-fungi-photos/


Go to
Sep 17, 2023 07:38:44   #
Bob Smith wrote:
I wonder how many people are influenced by posts on social media which don't agree with their own personal views, I imagine very few. Has social media completely replaced the face to face discussion where you heard the other person's point and he heard yours, but you did hear it. Has it made it too easy to ignore the other person's perspective and only look at your own perception of things. Has social media made division in society worse? Has it elevated free speech too a point where there's no consideration for other peoples feelings and no consequences to whatever vitriol anyone wishes to spout. Should free speech mean no responsibility whatsoever. I'm sure when the foundling father's wrote the first amendment they could never conceive some of the hate in modern social media. But Pandora is out of the box and there's no putting her back. Anybody agree and have a solution, Anybody?
I wonder how many people are influenced by posts o... (show quote)


Here is my take on today’s Free speech and Social/Mass Media conundrum.

First. The phrase ‘Free speech’, as used in the Constitution, should not be interpreted to mean you can, with complete immunity at any time, say anything you like that is derogatory or slanderous about another person or engage in ad hominem character assassination without expecting some sort of remuneration. If you call another person’s mother ‘a swoll'nan odoriferous dog face soldier pony, with knobby knees’, you should anticipate justifiable negative feedback in kind, or more.

Free speech means you may express your feelings, ideas, understandings and opinions openly and freely during public discourse without the expectation of unwarranted retribution as long as your words are not calumniatorly salacious toward another person’s character. This is unobjectionable even if the things you say are not demonstrable or if they are inconsistent with the currently accepted popular dialog, understanding or practice; as long as you allow others ample unimpeded equal opportunity to react concomitantly to what you have said. Free speech must have the elements of timely reciprocity and scrutiny, if it is to be considered, in any way, equitable and nondiscriminatory.

The problem with today’s social/mass media is it allows all types of nefarious expressions to be propagated surreptitiously without the benefit of timely face-to-face interchange and examination regardless of the validity of the statements. Plus, the fact, once the words are uttered or documented, they exist for all time. They never go away nor become revised, modified or removed even when the original concept has been vetted and found to be implausible, unsubstantiated or untrue. Even in cases where the original poster has become enlightened and now no longer supports their original stated premise; the abrogated words still remain.
Go to
Sep 13, 2023 11:28:04   #
Make a clear cone and mount it on that. It will look like the car they sent into space.
Go to
Aug 31, 2023 07:45:16   #
jerryc41 wrote:
A friend asked me to check her tire pressure. She thought one of them was low, so she stopped somewhere and added air. I checked the pressures, and the front right was at 97 PSI. She said the pump shut off, so she figured the pressure was correct. Lucky, lucky, lucky.


Jerry: As soon as possible, check the oil level in her car!
Some people should not be driving cars!
Go to
Aug 29, 2023 14:42:14   #
BebuLamar wrote:
If so the argument that developers have to eat doesn't have merit. When they developed the software and sold it for the first time they made the money then they should go on and develop something else to make more money. They can't expect to make one product and have enough to eat their whole life.

I think they view the investment of developing a piece of software like building a house.
When you build a house, you can sell it or rent it out.
If you sell it you get a lump sum and are no longer responsible for maintenance or repair.
If you rent it out you get a cash flow over a long period of time but you must maintain the asset.
I think software companies have discovered they can make more return on the asset (ROA) by
changing the way they market the asset. So, they have changed from outright selling software to renting software, because it provides a greater return on their investments. And enhances long term company stability through cash flow. The gift that keeps on giving!
It also provides them maximum control over the asset while it is in the hands of the customer. They can turn it off or on and control features at will.
I believe the next step will be the ‘pay-to-play’ algorithm. Where you must log on to their site to use the software. The site will check to see if you are up to date on your monthly payments before you will be allowed to run the software and the results of your usage will be stored on their server, with a monthly storage fee based on gigabits used.
Go to
Aug 25, 2023 17:16:34   #
elliott937 wrote:
Fair enough. Let's go to the next level. Consider this the 'door way' in a study of atomic physics. But this can help your quest.

Consider all the atoms that make up all the mass around us, ranging from the dirt on the ground, concrete, oceans, etc. Now of these atoms, consider only the valence shell, and Google can elaborate a great deal on this. But, in short, the valence shell of all atoms will be populated by electrons. How many? Well, carbon has 4 electrons. Gold has only one. How is this significant? If an atom has, in general less than half the number of electrons that COULD fit in that outer most shell, then this atom can easily give up those electrons. Then, this means that gold can very easily give up its one electron, and why gold is such a good conductor of electricity. If however the valence shell of an atom is 'nearly full', but has room for two electrons, then that atom will be "attracted" to another atom that just happens to have two electrons ... sitting out there, looking for a place to go. Can you see, if we move these to atoms close to each other, there will be an ATTRACTING force that exist between those two atoms. Now consider millions of atoms, being attracted to another million of atoms, and this results is a significant force. EX: Let's say our body has 1,000 atoms, and we are standing on the planet earth, with 1 gazillion atoms, our 1,000 will be attracted easily to that 1 gazillion atoms of the earth. Hence, we call that scenario a force of attraction. And on a grander scale, we call it Gravitation. By the way, gazillion is not a real number, but I like using it when suggesting a large number. I hope this explanation might help a little.
Fair enough. Let's go to the next level. Consider... (show quote)

Didn't you just describe the 'weak' force not gravity?
Go to
Aug 25, 2023 15:24:23   #
elliott937 wrote:
I am so glad you asked, for continuing to learn new things is, in my book, Mental Health. (I also believe that when we all get out with our cameras, AND do post-processing, it qualifies too as Mental Health.)

I'm sure you already know that a paragraph I could write here could never do it justice. But, as a coincidence, there is a favorite magazine that I subscribe to, and it's from the UK. It's called: "How It Works". I particularly enjoying more about Biology, which is not my major. But, relative to your inquiry about gravity, the newest issue that I just received has a front cover "What If There Was No Gravity?" I have not read it thoroughly yet, [we've just begun our new semester, leaving all a lot of "paperwork", all due tonight], but when I saw the formula: F = G(m1xm2)/r^2, which I teach in my second semester course, it really caught my attention. I also noticed a number of other facts, necessary to develop that formula. By the way, the "F" on the left side of the equal sign is the ""force of gravitational attraction"". Must of us know that as our ""weight"" seen when you get on a scale. But, actually, it's the force of attraction, and the m1 and m2 would be: our body mass & the mass of the earth. Just so I can peak your interest even more, there is a force of attraction between ANY two objects of mass. So, when you sit at your desk, there is a gravitational attraction between *the mass of your body, and *the mass of your desk. Pick ANY two objects of mass, around you per chance, and consider that must be a gravitational force between any two of them.

Oh, by the way, the article I mentioned is "Issue 179" and sells for 5.50 British pounds. I'm hoping you might have an extensive "book store and newspaper store" near you. It's worth every penny, or should I say pence?
I am so glad you asked, for continuing to learn ne... (show quote)


You, like so meany others, speak in terms of manifestations of gravity and not its root origination. Even the equation you refer to, and the examples you give, defines how it works, not why it works.
Thank you sir for your time.
Go to
Aug 25, 2023 04:22:23   #
elliott937 wrote:
I've enjoyed reading every comment written here about Amazon Customer Service, and especially about USPS. As I start my 57th. year of teaching, I've always believed that "If something is worth doing, it's worth doing right". Which, by the way, I hold true to myself as well.


With your extensive background in teaching physics, I would be interested in your theory regarding the origin of gravity. Not its manifestations, but its root source or origin. BTW- I have some difficulty with Einstein's theory of space warpage due to the objects mass.
Go to
Aug 21, 2023 15:50:48   #
elliott937 wrote:
I've been an Amazon Prime ever since they created "Prime", and in general, rather happy. Until now.

I purchased a product that a local dealer has confirmed as fraud. I started on a Monday morning to obtain a "Return Label". Amazon said they were having technical problems. After several hours, I called "Customer Service". I was told by someone in the Philippines that there is nothing they can do, except to tell me to call back in 4 hours. I did, and received the same message, except this time, I was told that it was -my- job to call back ever four hours. The employee, when asked, told me she was in the Philippines. Okay, every four hours, when asking to return a purchase, the screen said: "Return service not available".

On Tuesday, I saw the same "out of service", and the "Customer Service" told me ... yes, that it was my job to call every four hours. Only this time, the "Customer Service" was in the Caribbean. I'm not challenging the use of foreign countries to assist customers, but when I've asked to be returned to the USA, I only hear "we cannot do that".

After doing this for 48 hours, I needed peace, so I dropped the product into a trash dumpster. By the way, the product was a watch. It cost me only $ 161, but one must ask: Is this what we should expect in the future?
I've been an Amazon Prime ever since they created ... (show quote)


yes!
Go to
Aug 21, 2023 15:38:38   #
pendennis wrote:
Counterweights are along the walls at the bottom of the shaft. You should see the size of the electric motors that power those pulleys.


How big in terms of HP? Why so big?
Go to
Aug 21, 2023 08:16:14   #
Scruples wrote:
Elevators are basically simple devices that operate by pulleys. As the elevator rises a set of pulleys bring the weights down the side of the shaft. They rest in the weight well which is a huge square that holds the cab below the ground floor when the weights are at the top floor.

Beating a dead horse: Where are the counterweights when the cab is at the top floor?
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 64 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.