Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Dngallagher
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 661 next>>
Oct 20, 2020 21:15:34   #
bleirer wrote:
https://youtu.be/f3kYFnIYB0s

Nice overview of the new tools in action from Photoshop training channel


Go to
Oct 20, 2020 19:05:59   #
Curmudgeon wrote:
Just downloaded the PS update and I have to admit I am impressed so far. Sky replacement is found in the Edit menu. It is impressive with complex foregrounds. It doesn't seem miss or clip anything. It has a small library to which you can add images to or go to your own sky files. It is not a background replacement tool like Luminar 4. PS must recognize the file you want to place as having some percentage of sky in it.

It seems like a very nice basic too. Quick, easy to use and it probably has many features I haven't looked at yet. IMO it an adjunct to, not a replacement for, Luminar 4 but a tool I will be using.
Just downloaded the PS update and I have to admit ... (show quote)


Just took a quick look at it myself, yes, it was just a matter of time. From the couple of quick edits I tried it seemed to work nicely.

The Neural filters also appear to be in response to other A.I. Plugins, except the A.I. Is located at Adobe, which might be smarter as it requires less horsepower on the local machine.

I have not looked at all the upgrades for Lightroom yet, but expect good things!
Go to
Oct 20, 2020 16:31:25   #
[quote=Curmudgeon][i]Lightroom Classic[i/] by Scott Kelby Copyright 2020, Page 32. It should be available at your local library. Here is a partial quote: ...I don't recommend working in the folders panel at all. It's too risky--make a mistake and it's forever...." I'll take his word for it and only work in Collections and besides, if I set up my collections right I have no need to go into the folders panel.[/quote]

Sounds confusing... if you delete an image from a folder it is gone... yes... delete it from a collection and it is also gone....

Prove to yourself that the image in any collection is actually the original in a folder.... right click on any image in any collection and choose go to folder in library - Lightroom will switch to the folder panel and select the image from the collection.... not a copy.

One of the most basic things about Lightroom is to know where your images are for backup and access. Collections have no bearing on where the images are located on disk.

BTW - I might agree with SK about working in folders panel... but it depends on the context....perhaps what he was saying was , if you delete a photo from the folders panel it is gone forever, if you are in a collection you have no option to delete, you can only remove from a collection, which does not delete the original.
Go to
Oct 20, 2020 16:20:48   #
via the lens wrote:
I do know that Scott Kelby is a big fan of using collections and never using folders, although I could not understand this as it seemed much too complicated for me. I always try to work fast and efficient without duplication as much as possible. I also try to keep my LrC catalog neat and tidy so as to avoid any problems that cause me hours of senseless time being used up. It could be that the poster was/is a bit confused about what Kelby recommended.


I just watched a SK video about collections - he does explain what they are of course, and makes a case for ease of use, but what confuses things is that he does not explain that the actual images are located in a specific folder and that the collection is just a set of pointers - I can see where it can get confusing.

Catalog management is a good thing!
Go to
Oct 20, 2020 15:59:50   #
chasgroh wrote:
Me, too. I have so many images the task to update isn't just daunting, it just ain't gonna happen. Now, if I started now... ;0)


I felt the same way... until I sat down one evening and started... creating nested keywords cut loads of time off the task and soon all my images were properly key worded to my satisfaction.
Go to
Oct 20, 2020 15:58:01   #
Curmudgeon wrote:
This is a repost of my original. Amazing how misusing two words can change the whole meaning. I even screwed this one up, please click on "See Quote" to see the new edits


I would love to read what Scott said - it seems odd, but maybe there is more to what he is saying.
Go to
Oct 20, 2020 14:32:24   #
frankraney wrote:
Lightroom is just a database with a bunch of pointers. It does not import your original photos. It just has a database that points to it on your hard drive. When you edit the photos again, this goes into lightroom's database the original photo is unchanged. If you go to your browser and go look at that photo outside of Lightroom it's untouched. Collections again, are just pointers back to the original catalog file in Lightroom. Any change you make to that photo in Lightroom can be done from The collection or the original and it will show up anywhere that photo appears in Lightroom. A photo can be in several collections anywhere you change it it will appear in all of them. I hope this clears things up a little bit a lot of people get confused but your original files are never repeat never changed.

I hope this makes sense, sometimes I have a hard time explaining things but the point is you're original file is never changed.
Lightroom is just a database with a bunch of point... (show quote)


Go to
Oct 20, 2020 14:02:48   #
Davethehiker wrote:
Thank you gentlemen. I just turned on ALL the auto updates. It's downloading as I type this message.

I have the $9.99 monthly plan.




Just saw my new updates coming down as well.
Go to
Oct 20, 2020 13:45:35   #
Curmudgeon wrote:
Please correct me where I am wrong: My Catalog File contains all files I have added to Lightroom. If I work with these original files any and all changes are permanent and change the original file, unless I change the file name.

Lightroom allows me to create a set called "Collections". Copies of files contained in the Catalog can be copied to the Collections Set where they can be edited without effecting the original file in the Catalog file.


Creating a collection does not copy anything, it is simply a grouping of the images within your catalog. You can have many collections within Lightroom, they are virtual, images can be within many collections at the same time. Editing an image within a collection changes the “original”.

Lightroom can have 1 catalog file open at any one time. It contains pointers to the images that have been imported, and what edits have been made to that image. If you close the catalog, there are no images to edit.

Are you using Lightroom Classic or Lightroom CC? Classic is the desktop version, CC is the cloud or mobile version.

Not sure why you have to change the file name...when I edit a shot in Lightroom, I make my edits then if completed, move on the next image...changes are saved instantly to the catalog and the xmp info for that image.

There is no save or save as needed.

If I call Photoshop or another plugin for a tweak, Lightroom creates a copy (Tiff or Psd) and passes that image to the plugin, on return, Lightroom displays the plugin edited image stacked with the original.

Re-reading your post, it may be you are creating a folder called “collection”, which is different from a collection in Lightroom. If you create a folder of any name, then copy images to it you would be correct that changes would not affect the original, but now you have multiple copies of your image to deal with.
Go to
Oct 20, 2020 13:09:50   #
Curmudgeon wrote:
I only have about 5,000 photos to manage.

I use all the tools for data base management that LR Classic provides. When I download from camera, LR creates a file on my system drive by download date. When I get over the lazyies (not a real word) I cull, key word, adjust white balance and and assign to a Collection. Following Scott Kelby's sage advice I NEVER work in the Catalog File. Key words are added as Birds>Mockingbirds and Thrashers>Curve-billed Thrasher, if I take the file to Topaz Studio 2 I may add something like >Abstract to the key word list.

Probably not a reasonable procedure for everyone but it works for me.
I only have about 5,000 photos to manage. br br I... (show quote)


Actually, if you are doing any editing or key wording in Lightroom, you ARE working in the Catalog file...the catalog is the DATABASE that makes Lightroom. All edits are held within the catalog for each image unless you write the xmp data to the image or sidecar file or export the image.
Go to
Oct 20, 2020 11:43:45   #
via the lens wrote:
Why use a nested system? Because this allows you to have a very short list to choose from at any given time and prevents having to scroll down, while seeking a specific word, a long list of keywords. A nested system also allows you to quickly, within seconds, find a specific subject image, such as birds, or a family member. This also saves time. I like to work quick and easy so I try to stay organized. Keywords are also very easy to alter by choosing the keyword and then using the right click, so you fix errors quickly and easily. I do not keyword upon import unless every single image is the same subject, then I would keyword at import. I generally keyword at some point after I've imported the images and played with them to process (I shoot RAW). There are many ways to keyword, I think I counted seven in all but there could be more. I cannot include text from the Nikonian article that I wrote as they now own it or I would. If you have been key wording and want to find the images that do not contain a keyword you can do that in the included Smart Collection that is standard in LrC. It's easy to keyword, for me, in the morning with a cup of coffee in hand and it goes very quickly. Your keyword list must match what you shoot in general and should be designed to grow as needed. Again, doing this on paper first is the best approach. Keywording can save countless minutes/hours of time when you are working on a special project or looking for images for a competition or to sell. I've included a few screenshots to clarify.
Why use a nested system? Because this allows you ... (show quote)



Go to
Oct 20, 2020 08:40:27   #
via the lens wrote:
I have an article on key wording on the Nikonians website, I write for them often. It is very easy to keyword and this allows you to find just about any image in mere seconds. The best first step is to think about what you photograph and then develop a keyword list on paper, think it through completely. While LrC will handle about 1,000 keywords you don't really want that! Use a "nested" system, so ANIMALS>Wild, ANIMALS>Domestic, and then in Wild you would have, for example, Wild>Birds, Wild>Birds>Egrets. Then, if you mark something as an Egret it is automatically included in Birds and Wild and Animals. Read the section on Key wording in the LrC online Help manual prior to starting. You can also purchase and import a key word list or use one that a friend has and then edit either one as needed, then import into your software. Just recently I also decided to use another way to group images using keywords, by putting a word in the Caption section of the metadata and using a Quick Collection. There are many ways to key word but thinking it through completely is key, pun intended, to your success with the project.
I have an article on key wording on the Nikonians ... (show quote)


Exactly, a nested/hierarchical keyword system saves lots of time, applies lots of keywords, and keeps them spelled and capitalized properly, allowing quick and easy selection from a list. My main headings are Who, What, When and Where, each having multiple sub headings, easily expandable as needed.

Go to
Oct 20, 2020 02:19:26   #
SteveR wrote:
The real question for me is if I stream tv like acorn plus, would I be better off capturing it through ethernet cable connected to the router/modem or via today's wifi? Or would there not be much difference?


Unless you use a really old WiFi router that tops out at 11 mbs you would likely see no difference provided you have a good signal

FWIW- my desktop iMac is connected to my router with Ethernet cable, all other devices in my house are WiFi, including streaming to two TVs & two WiFi printers, my wife’s iMac and three laptops over three floors

No slowdowns anywhere, I did need to place an access point in one room to boost the WiFi signal for that room though
Go to
Oct 20, 2020 02:08:43   #
Spirit Vision Photography wrote:
Hello

I am new to digital photography. I recently acquired a Nikon D90 and D750. If I download my RAW NEF files into Lightroom, they are converted to Adobe DNG files. I’ve read that this in not as good as keeping them in the Nikon RAW format.

What Nikon software is recommend for reading and processing Nikon RAW files? I use a laptop with Windows 10.

Thank You

As others have said, you are telling Lightroom to import as DNG during the import, just change that to copy, move or add as needed.

FWIW: I shoot raw, currently with a Canon 90D, before that with a Canon 80D, before that with a Nikon D7100, before that with a Nikon 5100, and before that with a Nikon 3000. I convert to DNG all my raw files on import into Lightroom. In many cases I first view and select what to import by using Fast Raw Viewer so I do not waste time converting and importing everything.

The only drawback is that the DNG format may not be supported by non-Adobe software, so to be safe I keep a copy of my original raw on a separate disk, but so far have never needed to go back to an original NEF or CRx

As long as Lightroom manages my images, other editors can be used as plugins and will make use of TIFF or PSD for the round trip anyway.

Benefits - storage space reduction, faster loading during editing, original raw image can be stored inside the DNG, xmp edits contained within the single file, DNG accepted by Amazon Prime Photo storage as an image type, so unlimited backup space for free. (NEF & CR2 also accepted, but CR3 was too new for them)
Go to
Oct 19, 2020 14:55:48   #
Longshadow wrote:
I have an old bulk audio tape demagnetizer that I got from Laffayette Radio in the early 70's?
I actually used it to degauss a color TV (CRT) screen years ago.


Lafayette radio was my favorite electronics store back in those days....never cared for radio shack.

Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 661 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.