Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Rexene
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8 next>>
Feb 2, 2014 19:17:00   #
She was interviewed on 20/20 or one of those shows like it this weekend. It came up that there was a man's DNA, who they have identified, in the roommates room, inside her body, in a bloody handprint on her wall, and his DNA in her purse, which was missing cash and her wallet! It seems to me that this guy might be the killer!!
Go to
Jan 25, 2014 20:30:50   #
What a cool photo! I also like the perspective.
Go to
Jan 25, 2014 09:18:18   #
Interesting and beautiful! I especially like number 3 because there is no distraction because of your framing. Possibly try cropping the first two for the same effect.
Go to
Jan 25, 2014 08:37:08   #
Beautiful, clear photos! What lens did you use?
Go to
Jan 5, 2014 09:56:46   #
WOW!! This photo makes me feel like I am right there passing her!
Go to
Feb 12, 2013 17:26:25   #
Great photos! My favorite is the close-up of the horse. Very nice angle and a beautiful horse.....I want him!!
Go to
Jan 6, 2013 23:24:41   #
Beautiful! Love everything about this shot!!
Go to
Jan 6, 2013 23:02:37   #
Love these photos! Camera, lens, settings, etc.?
Go to
Jan 6, 2013 22:49:33   #
Fantastic shot and beautiful little girl, just like her mommy!
Go to
Oct 24, 2012 15:12:54   #
Thanks everyone for your great advice. I currently have kit lenses 18 - 55mm 3.5 - 5.6G DX VR and 55 - 200mm 4 - 5.6G ED DX VR and a prime 50mm 1.8D.

I should have mentioned these lenses in my original post. Perhaps this will change some of your recommendations.
Go to
Oct 24, 2012 00:35:54   #
Mac wrote:
Rexene wrote:
Mac wrote:
I have a Sigma 150-500mm I bought for for wildlife and I am happy with it, though because it's a heavy lens I usually use it with a monopod or a tripod.
For landscape you might want to consider a wide angle lens to capture the breadth of the scenery. I use a Nikkor 10-24mm for landscapes.


Thanks for your reply, Mac. So, for landscape; i.e., mountains, etc. you get the distance needed with your 10-24mm?


Rexene
If you stop down your aperture to f16 or f22, that will give you enough DoF that everything will be in focus.

Check this out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JL8Qdxz5XA

I hope this helps.
quote=Rexene quote=Mac I have a Sigma 150-500mm ... (show quote)


Thanks again, Mac! I watched several videos from BH Photo and he really explains things well! I subscribed to his podcasts on my iPad!
Go to
Oct 23, 2012 22:21:38   #
ahzwizerd2 wrote:
Man that's Ok and all
I have used a 18-105 And my photos look great but a 55-300 work well so save some money about $300


Ahzwizerd2, Thanks for your reply. With the 55-300mm lens, do you get the distance needed for wildlife, birds, etc.?
Go to
Oct 23, 2012 22:20:03   #
Mac wrote:
I have a Sigma 150-500mm I bought for for wildlife and I am happy with it, though because it's a heavy lens I usually use it with a monopod or a tripod.
For landscape you might want to consider a wide angle lens to capture the breadth of the scenery. I use a Nikkor 10-24mm for landscapes.


Thanks for your reply, Mac. So, for landscape; i.e., mountains, etc. you get the distance needed with your 10-24mm?
Go to
Oct 23, 2012 20:49:30   #
I am looking for a lens that won't break the bank for landscape and wildlife photography. I ran across a used (purchased May 2012) Sigma 150-500mm F/5.0-6.3 APO HSM DG OS Lens For Nikon for $850.00. Would this lens meet my needs and is this a good deal? If not, what would you suggest? Would I be better off purchasing a new Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM APO Autofocus Lens for $999.00? What would be a good lens for a trip to Hawaii next month? I use a Nikon D7000 camera.
Go to
Oct 21, 2012 21:17:19   #
I like your original photos better than the post processed ones. Love old buildings!
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.