Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Clynro
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
Nov 22, 2013 18:00:09   #
I really like #2. Well done.
Go to
Oct 18, 2013 13:24:18   #
Dan5000 wrote:
Hi Clyn, Thanks for looking. It helps to avoid too much direct sun, use a small aperture,and experiment. A telephoto lens also helps.


Those are exactly the things I've thought were the keys, but I have yet to get one I'm truly pleased with. I thought I might be overlooking something in addition to those hints. I'll keep practicing!
Go to
Oct 17, 2013 16:07:58   #
How did you get the nice starburst? Every time I try, I always get one with tons of rays, rather than just the 8 like you have. I know it has to do with the number of leaves on the diaphragm, but I can't seem to get what you have achieved here.
Go to
Oct 10, 2013 11:46:42   #
jonsommer wrote:
So, last Sunday was a beautiful fall day, I'm sitting in the late afternoon sun enjoying the day and I look at my wife's bird feeder in the distance, and it's loaded with these beautiful little yellow bellied birds. Even though I'm a very serious portrait shooter, I thought I'd bring out the tripod, mount my 2.8 70-200 and see if I could get some interesting yellow-bellied bird shots. I actually had more fun than I thought I would, except for one thing. I started thinking that I needed a much bigger lens to get 'closer' and not have to crop so much to get interesting shots. So I looked at the prices of big lenses (gasp!) and I wondered if a teleconverter was really a viable option. A Nikon 1.7 or 2.0 is about $500 bucks, which is doable, but I've never used one or know anybody that has, so, I'd really like to hear from any fellow Hoggers that have experience with teleconverters, especially the Nikons. Are they really a viable option, or do I need to spend lots of thousands on a quality big lens to get the reach and quality I want?
So, last Sunday was a beautiful fall day, I'm sitt... (show quote)


I've been watching these threads for quite some time now, as I'm kind of in your boat with a 70-200mm lens and a desire to be able to better fill the frame without cropping so much. Though there are people who have made comments to the contrary, and though some of the pictures posted are quite nice, what I've consistently come away with from all the threads I've followed, is that teleconverters are a cheaper option, but you do pay a price in terms of IQ, you lose a couple of stops of light, and you often (depending on the lens and teleconverter) lose lens functionality.

All of these have led me to feel that if I am serious about accomplishing the goals I have and listed above, I'm probably going to have to pony up and get the longer lens rather than go the route of the teleconverter. I was disappointed to have come to that conclusion for myself, and it will be different for everyone depending on personal expectations and how critically you will judge your work. As a serious but amateur photographer, I decided to go with the longer lens. Though I haven't yet put my money where my mouth is just yet--still saving--so you'll have to take that with a grain of salt.
Go to
Oct 4, 2013 11:35:36   #
I think that something very important is being overlooked in all this. Sure, the politicians are fighting for or against Obamacare, and as much as it pains me to say this, I think the Republicans are convinced that Obama is unwilling to negotiate to improve the flawed legislation because it will tarnish what he perceives as his legacy. As flawed as it is, Obama won't back down because of his own pride and will sink the nations health care to preserve it. The point is, that Obama will not negotiate now--or ever. The government shut down is the only card that the Democrats have left the Republicans to play--and I wish they didn't have to play it, but I see why they are. And I feel bad for those suffering as a result.

The real issue is the fact that the spending of our government is out of control--why else would the government run out of money? If the government wasn't out of control with it's spending, there would be no shut down, and no way for the Republicans to be holding the government hostage. I don't pretend to understand all the implications of a shutdown or the looming default, but I can't help but wonder if it might be good for us to default so that borrowing would be more difficult. The government would then be forced to live within it's means and we would finally have to make the tough decisions that are being delayed with a bill that will have to be footed by future generations.
Go to
Oct 2, 2013 11:41:20   #
wizbird wrote:
Clynro; good reply. I'm in the same boat and went to Aperture because I was using iPhoto and felt they would dovetail. Still learning. Not easy. I like taking photos better then editing.


I'm with you there, but I like the way the photos can really be improved with a little work!
Go to
Oct 1, 2013 19:30:04   #
laskalass wrote:
In Alaska they are so numerous that they are NOT timid and you need to steer clear..they live in our backyards and parks and school yards..so it's not unusual for a mom to call the school that her child will be late due to a "moosecall" and as soon as the moose moves out of the driveway or street the child will go on to school....often kids are called in off the playground if a moose wanders on it although most schools have fenced school yards...I don't know if they are more timid in other states where they arent in so much human contact...not trying to highjack your topic though..so Im sorry if I'm being presumptuous!
In Alaska they are so numerous that they are NOT t... (show quote)


No problem! I'm all for learning all I can about this stuff. Here in Utah, they sure don't act timid. They walk around like they own the place. They seem to just go where they want. If you're in the way, they'll just wait until you move, and then go on their way. They do seem to be keeping close tabs on me when I'm taking my photos, though. They don't really seem to get spooked by much, though I've noticed that they tend to prefer getting away from a close crowd. Deer, on the other hand, are very flighty in comparison. You get close enough, or startle them, and they will be off like a rocket. A moose will just watch you, like it's trying to size you up. I've never seen one get aggressive, but they can be very dangerous. It is wise to keep a wide margin of safety. I also like to have a tree or something to keep between us if I ever felt threatened.
Go to
Oct 1, 2013 19:23:13   #
MagicMark wrote:
Simply beautiful. Love the colors. :)


Thanks magicmark! The colors are what it's all about this time of year!!
Go to
Oct 1, 2013 19:22:20   #
Photo Girl wrote:
Wonderful shots!


Thanks for the kudos photogirl!
Go to
Oct 1, 2013 12:16:27   #
I appreciate the encouragement. Thanks everyone for looking!
Go to
Oct 1, 2013 01:44:46   #
laskalass wrote:
Very nice....moose are solitary animals except in the fall when the Rut takes place...then you will see mama's and Bull moose together...the babys stay with the mama for at least two years so you will often see what looks like a family but that baby would not be the offspring of that bull...most likely he is hanging with mama and the Bull is interested in mating...you will often see Bull fighting at this time too. Up here moose are all over, like stray dogs...in your back yard and everywhere ...they are not safe to get close to however at any time of year and will stomp you to death. Nice shots though...I would just get a bigger lens as you shouldnt get too close...
Very nice....moose are solitary animals except in ... (show quote)


Interesting! I never knew any of that about moose. That makes me wonder what the moose I got the close up on was thinking. I'm not knowledgeable enough to know if it was a bull or not, but it appeared to have something left of it's antlers, so I was thinking bull. He was behind us with an even better view of the scene of the three moose above. I wonder if he (if it was a he) was also interested in the cow!
Go to
Sep 30, 2013 13:08:20   #
Thanks Sunnykaren, colo43, and Linda! It was interesting to watch the interplay between the three moose. There was definitely no threatening or defensive postures taken my the cow. In fact, they would snuggle up to one another every once in a while. The cow was almost always at the side of her calf, but the bull was just kind of standing guard, so to speak. It was quite the functional moose family. There were times when I could see the bull and cow actively seeking responses from one another as they monitored their calf. I only wished I could have been closer, but I don't think that would have been a very wise move!
Go to
Sep 30, 2013 13:02:03   #
Thanks Rebel Hiker, it took a number of attempts to get a few keepers. I had a thought to try and do some experimenting with a graduated ND filter on #2, but it was after the fact in post processing when that thought struck me. I guess I'll just have to remember that for next time.
Go to
Sep 30, 2013 02:41:19   #
Thanks RE. The first one stood at least 7 feet tall. Usually I'm only able to find one if I'm lucky. I can't believe this time around I saw five!!
Go to
Sep 30, 2013 02:34:03   #
These were taken this past weekend in Brighton, UT. Snow fell for the first time the day before I arrived (it would have been awesome to get pictures of the fall colors with a little more snow to spice things up, but I thought these turned out OK).

Feel free to offer advice on ways to improve these shots.

1


2


3


4

Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.