Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: CraigB
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
May 25, 2014 17:45:20   #
Looks like it is sold!

Thanks!
Go to
May 23, 2014 21:58:38   #
I am selling my Sekonic L-478DR Lightmeter with all the accessories that came with it. I am including the optional 5 degree spot attachment and the X-Rite Passport ColorChecker that has both the grey cards for color balance and grey for calibrating your L-478DR to your camera.

It is like new condition.

This model has the built in Pocket Wizard that controls their Flex system and triggers their standard radios.

$400 + $10 priority mail within the US.






Go to
Aug 10, 2013 12:01:17   #
Mason Jar wrote:
At what point does photography end and computer "animation" begin? I ask only because there is some mention of photoshop or other editing software daily in this forum. It seems that today even a "bad" picture can be made good by a person on a computer. A graphic arts degree in hand can aid that photo in becoming a great picture. Presently there are courts that will no longer accept photographic evidence due to the ability of a photoshop artist in manipulating the evidence. Why is it we spend as much if not more to buy a computer and software to edit the art we created or better yet captured on "film" or actually digital memory card and a box of circuits and resistors?
At what point does photography end and computer &q... (show quote)


Some of the greatest photographers spent a huge amount of their time in the darkroom to "create" the image they wanted. Now, how is this any different than using our electronic darkroom? Except a whole lot easier and safer.
Go to
Aug 3, 2013 10:15:34   #
I just purchased the X100S yesterday, arrives next week. I saw a good comparison of the Lecia M, X100S, and the RX1 that Steve Huff did. Yes, you certainly can see the difference between the Lecia and the X100S, but at $9K difference, you should. What was interesting is the RX1 looked as good as the M in most all regards.

I just do not like the viewfinder-less RX1 and I don't care to purchase their "add-on" and I simply don't care to spend that type of money on a camera that limits my options for lens.

Bottom line, the IQ is good under most circumstances and with the prices lining up at: $10,000 vs $2799 vs $1299, I think the X100S does darn good.

I currently have 2 Nikon D800e's that I use primarily for weddings. It is a great camera with excellent IQ. But, I wanted several things the X100S provides. X-Sync all the way to 1/4000, good viewfinder, fast focus with the feel of a rangefinder, quiet shutter, and a nice carry around camera that I will actually carry.

I am surprised that the X-Sync capability of this camera is not talked about much. FP/HSS just does not cut it. I will be able to sync a really Speedlight or my Einsteins all the way up to 1/4000 second at f/8...1/1000 to f/2. This is really a nice feature for outdoor portraits. Plus if need f/2 with full sync but 1/1000 does not cut it, then use the 3-stop ND filter.

I believe the X100S will make a nice camera for unobtrusive shots at receptions and other gatherings. (Small size and almost nonexistent shutter noise)

Fuji seems to be stuck on the x-trans sensor...you either love it or hate it. I will not know until I use it. But, from some of the comments I've read, it produces a very nice "grain" type look to the image.

I saw several photographs that Mark Kitaoka captured with the X100S using high sync speeds, they are absolutely beautiful, well executed and darn good IQ.

Regards,
Craig
Go to
Jun 24, 2013 12:05:27   #
Depends on what you want to do with the flash and how hard you drive it as well as if you want to use Nikon's CLS... as in wanting the external flash to operate in Master or Remote modes.

I use both the SB-910 and SB-900 professionally. They are powerful, big and expensive. They fully support all Nikon's flash modes.

The SB-700 and SB-600 are good for all around flash use. The SB-600 cannot be used as a Master, but your built-in flash on the D600 can control it remotely.

The SB-400 is too little IMO to consider. Not much better than your built-in flash and no remote capability unless using radio system.

Or you could find a good used SB-800. It is still one of the best flashes Nikon produced. It is as powerful, yet smaller than the SB-9xx series, only draw back is the zoom range does not go out to 200mm like the SB-9xx series. And it works in Master or Remote modes too.
Go to
May 17, 2013 22:55:04   #
AlanK wrote:


I upgraded from a 17" matt screen MacBook Pro dual core Intel 2.93Ghz, to a 15" retina display MacBook Pro. The new laptop has an i7 Intel Quad core running at 2.83GHz (boost to 3.8GHz, 16GB ram (max) and a 750GB SSD drive (both max from Apple).

This new machine SMOKES through my 36.4MP Nikon D800 RAW files so fast it's amazing (no more spinning wheels ;`).
Alan

I use the same and as Alan points out, smokes through D800 RAW files with no problem.

I find the Retina display to be very accurate. I profile both my monitor and printer with XRite's ColorMunki. Everything from albums to professionally printed prints come out perfectly matching what I edited on screen.

The SSD drive makes a huge difference when using Lightroom 4 and Photoshop. Smoking fast drive.
Regards,
Craig
Go to
Apr 17, 2013 17:16:15   #
phil7782 wrote:
One thing I mentioned to her was that on the OLD mechanical SLR's, there was a way to preview the Depth of Field by holding down the Aperture Close Down lever before pressing the shutter. After all, film was rather expensive to "waste". Anyway, this would let the aperture leaves in the lens close down and though the image in the view finder would darken at higher f stops, you could see what the film plane would see when the shutter was snapped, the aperture closed down and the film was exposed. It's more involved on my DSLR to preview DOF , but is available. How about yours?
One thing I mentioned to her was that on the OLD ... (show quote)


All the DSLR's I've owned have this, it is called "Depth of Field Preview" and is typically a button on the front of the camera....same place as the film cameras had it.
Go to
Feb 18, 2013 08:11:16   #
I have used and still use light meters (starting with an old Weston than Minolta, and for the pass 10 years a Sekonic). Currently use Sekonic L-478DR and although my D800e's meters are very good, the light meter is an excellent tool to have.

If anything, it teaches you to look at the light and understand what exposure is. I bet most photographers do not know what the Sunny f/16 rule is or how to apply it.

Most of the time the camera's meter does a good job, but it is a reflective meter trying it's best to make everything 18% grey. A light meter is an incident meter, so it reads light falling on the subject and not reflected by the object.

There is no substitute for getting exposure correct in your camera, though you can correct a lot in post, you still are losing information by not getting it right to begin with.

I used mine yesterday for an outside engagement shoot. As well as setting up my flashes when we moved indoors....though Nikon's CLS system is very good, at times, I like to take full control of the strobes and nail down my lights to what I want.
Go to
Feb 18, 2013 08:01:44   #
Hi PalePictures,
Beautiful images and very good technique and CaptainC as well.

Thanks (both) for sharing your thoughts and techniques.

Years ago, I used a plug-in from Fred Miranda, which did a fairly good job in conversion. I believe it's been renamed B&W workflow, but I have not used it.

Bottom line, it does take time and a good eye to represent B&W properly. I am amazed when I see a desaturated photo being passed off as B&W. To me, it resembles a dead person. No life in the photo and certainly does not approach any film look.
Go to
Feb 15, 2013 13:30:13   #
pounder35 wrote:
CraigB wrote:
You need to build a portfolio, get a company like Getty Images to pick you up, then start selling workshops on how to make photographs that sell.



A portfolio is not like the old days. An on-line presence is a must whether your own web site or a photo hosting site.


Your on-line presence is your portfolio. Bottom line, you got to have work to sell, then you have to promote it. In today's world, that is online through website, social networks, and stock photo sites.

But in the end, you will most likely make your living selling workshops, if you choose not to get into wedding and event photography.
Go to
Feb 15, 2013 13:15:49   #
Elfstop wrote:
Frank T wrote:
Think about this. The first video, the homeowner has an extensive surveillance system and assault weapons readily available. He's attacked by three men with assault rifles.
He's either a drug dealer or he lives in Islamabad.
Really. Lot more to this story than it shows.


He was a drug dealer and those guys were ripping him off...


Do you have a reference to this?
Go to
Feb 15, 2013 13:07:27   #
Elfstop wrote:

TOO LATE..YOU VOTED PEOPLE IN THAT DOES THAT FOR YOU.

And how would you know who I voted for?
Go to
Feb 15, 2013 13:02:19   #
You need to build a portfolio, get a company like Getty Images to pick you up, then start selling workshops on how to make photographs that sell.
Go to
Feb 15, 2013 12:57:36   #
Elfstop wrote:
Blurryeyed wrote:
Elfstop wrote:
Wabbit wrote:
Elfstop wrote:
The rest of the story....in the first video the home owner pursues the burglars and fires on them....that's against the law because they were no longer a threat and he should have been charged...I quit watching this bull**** when that loony ass Jesse Ventura started speaking...

And Obama is not anti gun.


Hey Doc ..... that depends on the State your in my friend ..... you've been watching too many metropolitan news casts ..... where I come from that's grounds for huntin em down, ya get a medal for each one you shoot!
quote=Elfstop The rest of the story....in the fir... (show quote)


NO State allows you to chase down and shoot a fleeing subject that is NO threat to you or others and kill them or even assault them. I don't know where you come from but there are no places that give out medals for that either.

Not saying it's not a good ideal tho. I am a police officer and in Tennessee it's against the law.

And you have been watching too many Elmer Fudd re-runs from the 30's....lol.
quote=Wabbit quote=Elfstop The rest of the story... (show quote)


I am pretty sure that since the perpetrators were all heavily armed that the home owner would face no charges where I live, in fact it is my belief that not only did he have the right and necessity of self defense, that had he not used and continued to the weapon against the four armed men that it is very likely that he and anyone else in that home may have ended up dead...

Glad I live in Florida, you can shot bad guys anywhere.
quote=Elfstop quote=Wabbit quote=Elfstop The re... (show quote)



Not self defense when they are running AWAY from you..self defense was over the second they ran..Thats florida law too..come on guys get a grip or just shoot someone running away and see what happens.
quote=Blurryeyed quote=Elfstop quote=Wabbit qu... (show quote)


That's true from a legal standpoint, but no one is going to charge a homeowner defending his life and property with deadly force against an "army of 4" heavily armed thugs. Even and especially when the homeowner has them on the run. What if he stopped shooting and the thugs had a minute to think and regroup? It is obvious they where out to harm the homeowner with deadly force.

Let's stop defending thugs and defend the rights of our law abiding citizens.
Go to
Feb 11, 2013 20:25:30   #
Very good. Just keep on shooting and take your camera everywhere you go.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.