I am done with third party lenses on Nikon DSLR bodies. Had an 18-270 Tammy that was not as dependable as my Nikon 18-200 DX VR. Had a 150-600 Tammy that gave me acceptable shots maybe 1/3 of the time, that lens used to wander for me for focus lock even under near ideal conditions. And when it would lock, I got way too many soft shots. Got a Tammy 24-70 G2 for my D850, returned it to B&H after around a week of testing; once again had focus lock challenges. For the kind of cash some of those lenses cost, I expect them to deliver right out of the box. That's not to say all Nikon lenses are stellar; my 24-70 f/2.8 is my second version, the original was returned to Adorama.
I am done with third party lenses on Nikon DSLR bo... (show quote)
Every lens manufacture has lemons .... some more, some less, even Nikon!
The high end line of lens from Tamron, being half the cost with comparable if not better quality and performance, is most certainly giving Nikon a run for the money and a 6 year warranty ..... IMHO!
I went ahead an bought the Tamron 70-200 2.8 Di VC USD lens. Mounted to my D810 this setup is on the heavy side. Photos are super sharp. The only thing I noticed is when turning the zoom ring from 200 back to 70 it is slightly stiffer than going from 70-200. The sales guy showed me a $2100 Nikon 80-200 2.8 VRII which did the same thing, only worse. I was told this is normal and will get easier with use, so I am happy. Matches well with the D810 36MP sensor. 6 year warranty to boot .........
I am looking to acquire an 70-200 2.8 lens and I was wanting to know if anyone has an experience with the Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC G2 lens. I have the Tamron 35mm 1.4 lens and I am most happy with it. Nikon is out of the question as I can not afford $2800. Lens will be used on a Nikon D810 camera.
This is quickly becoming my stance. New QHD monitors are approaching the $500 mark and not being a gamer, hell I do not even own a game, staying with my FHD monitor is looking like a real good option.
I hate spending money for nothing, so I am going to run this question by all you knowledgeable people.
Currently I have an HP 27" FHD (1920x1080) monitor which I have used for 4 years to edit my photos and have been satisfied with the performance. I was wondering if I upgraded to a 27" QHD ( 2560 x 1440) monitor there would be an appreciable difference to justify the cost. A 34" monitor would be nice but not at close to $1000.
I have a Tamron 45mm 1.8 lens with vibration control, like new in the box for Nikon. Has been used only a few times, so I know if works perfectly. Selling as I bought the Tamron 15-30 2.8, which also has vibration control and is more versatile.
Selling for $250 + $35 shipping. ( UPS has really cranked up their prices ) Lens currently sells for $599.
Been ask, so for those who are curious, I paid $1500 for the Nikon D810.
I also wanted a battery grip but DAMN!, $426.95. Procam was selling off their inventory of MB-D12 Battery Grips for $175. Needless to say, I bought one and a spare battery. I called Procam and verified that this was a Genuine Nikon MB-D12, new in the box, before I placed the order. It was ......... YES!
Been ask, so for those who are curious, I paid $1500 for the Nikon D810.
I also wanted a battery grip but DAMN!, $426.95. Procam was selling off their inventory of MB-D12 Battery Grips for $175. Needless to say, I bought one and a spare battery. I called Procam and verified that this was a Genuine Nikon MB-D12, new in the box, before I placed the order. It was ......... YES!