Posts for: les2297
Jan 23, 2018 11:23:43 #
AndyP73 wrote:
Hi. I took this pic over Christmas, using my Canon... (show quote)
Luminar ... professional workspace...develop...adjust/ lens/ transform
use transform at -13 should be close
Dec 3, 2017 15:18:13 #
(Panorama)
Lightroom for reasons given above. Used ICE until I started doing HDR panoramas, then switched to Lightroom as everything is right there in one program. Also either Lightrooms stitching has gotten better or my inputs have.
Nov 29, 2017 21:44:17 #
Nov 29, 2017 14:40:06 #
Nov 29, 2017 13:03:56 #
(Panorama)
I'll try the new section
5 HDR stitched, all in Lightroom 6
Sony a6000, 18-105 f4 @18mm
5 HDR stitched, all in Lightroom 6
Sony a6000, 18-105 f4 @18mm
Apr 27, 2017 18:39:37 #
BebuLamar wrote:
I wanted to get the Panasonic LX-100 but the price stays high so I think I would get the Sony A6000 instead. I tried to download the manual from Sony but neither manual would show me how to use the camera in manual exposure or manual focusing. I want to learn how to use the camera and how it operates before I buy it.
ILCE-6000_HelpGuide_EN.pdf ... pg. 142 as per MadMike and pg.169.
Feb 4, 2017 14:27:33 #
Greenguy33 wrote:
What's your favorite Red River paper?
for landscapes?
for macro?
for portraits?
and others...
I'd love to hear what your favorites are.
for landscapes?
for macro?
for portraits?
and others...
I'd love to hear what your favorites are.
Canon Pro9500 Mark 2
Polar Pearl Metallic
Arctic Polar Luster
Polar Matte
Print mostly 13x19 Landscape...(12x18 picture)
Sep 8, 2016 17:07:24 #
more fuel for the fire... or not
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7vXJbLhTyI
I'm guessing that most photographers will not go back to work on a photo 9000 times
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7vXJbLhTyI
I'm guessing that most photographers will not go back to work on a photo 9000 times
Sep 8, 2016 15:13:32 #
downloaded the files.. used properties to gather data (Win 10)
you're right... the second file only loses about 25 KB of data.
Rongnongno wrote:
Please check your... 'Data'
The pixel size does not change. You seem to be comparing the 'original' to UHH thumbnail.
The pixel size does not change. You seem to be comparing the 'original' to UHH thumbnail.
you're right... the second file only loses about 25 KB of data.
Sep 8, 2016 14:57:25 #
The conclusion is ... you lose a lot of data.
The first pic is 609 KB, 2326 pixels x 1988
The 100 pic is 50.8 KB, 600 pixels x 515
Still works to view and show on your smart phone, but not worth much to make a nice 20 x24 in. enlargement
The first pic is 609 KB, 2326 pixels x 1988
The 100 pic is 50.8 KB, 600 pixels x 515
Still works to view and show on your smart phone, but not worth much to make a nice 20 x24 in. enlargement
Sep 1, 2016 11:44:12 #
Moisture collected on spider silks... light breeze.
never mind... it appears to be something man made looped over the tree branch
never mind... it appears to be something man made looped over the tree branch
Aug 8, 2016 14:10:34 #
duaneweir wrote:
Has anyone shot the milkyway with this lens? If, so what were the setting that you used?
ISO 6400, f3.5 @ 20 sec
May 17, 2016 10:35:06 #
Print at 11 x 17 ... set a 3 in margin on the bottom.
I was presuming you had 11 x 14 paper.
I was presuming you had 11 x 14 paper.
Genessi wrote:
I need to print an 11x14 print. I have the canon pro-100 printer but it doesn't show that size, Also can I use the 13x 19 size paper to print the 11x14. Need some help!
Sep 25, 2012 11:51:47 #
If nobody closer responds I would try to print out your sample on my 9500.
les
les
Elliott Design wrote:
Thought I'd bump this back into visibilty and see if any 9500 owners could help me out.
Thanks,,,,
Thanks,,,,
Jun 12, 2012 12:19:58 #
FYI... One mans opinion...
http://steelevisions.com/blog/best-canon-flash/
http://steelevisions.com/blog/best-canon-flash/