this shows it a bit better. About a 12 ft half pipe and the kids were getting a good six to eight feet up in the air above it on the bikes.
Amazing athletes. Doing the half-pipe at South Park in Pgh, PA
ok so you made the decision before you talked to me. But you should have bought the camera and sold some pics to pay the taxes. Win-Win
Thanks for all the comments and expertise.
The "greeter" on his throne
Anyone have a sense of the differences or which one is better to use? I currently use Photoshop Elements.
We've had great results from Bay Photo. You can set it up online and they deliver within days. We've done some large prints that came out exactly as expected.
just liked the angles on this.
Yes. Back to back photo's. One focused on the Moon and the next dialed back to pick up the background. Here's the moon shot alone. It just blots out everything else.
Here's the base photo that I sandwiched the moon on too. You can see the brightness just blots out the clouds.
by flying off, I meant the one where his wings are bent the most
Awesome. The clarity is stunning. I like the one where he's flying off the best....
Super Moon Shot: Trying for quite a while to get a picture of the moon and some background. Finally read enough and got some advice. Because a camera can't handle the dynamic range of both the brightness of the moon and the darkness of the background, one method is to take two pictures, one of each shot and put them together. This is what I came up with using that advice. Looks like it did to the naked eye. Used Photoshop Elements to merge the back to back shots.