Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: imageal
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 next>>
Aug 29, 2014 14:54:35   #
blacks2 wrote:
Thank you very much, all these were shot with a Nikon D800 and a 24-120 VRII Nikon, I cropped these in Photoshop, I used to have a Hasselblad Xpan in the film days and I still scan some Fujichrome, but the 24-120 does about the same when cropped.


Aha! You've got to love having all those 36+ megapixels to work with on shots like those. I knew you had a secret weapon.
Go to
Aug 29, 2014 14:05:59   #
Mike, you continue to amaze me. You say that these shots are crops from a single frame and not stitched panos. Did you shoot film and scan at a high resolution? Were you shooting in a larger format than typical 35mm or digital?
Go to
Aug 27, 2014 18:12:48   #
ebrunner wrote:
Let me know when you put all your Alaska photos together in a photo book. I'll buy it.


Me Too!
Go to
Aug 25, 2014 11:16:15   #
Thanks for the correction Kingmapix. My brain must have become dyslexic since the "n" and the "t" are well apart on the keyboard. Super "PHOTO."
Go to
Aug 24, 2014 14:52:35   #
That phone is one of the most original shots I have seen of our beautiful Southwest. Great composition and mix of elements.
Go to
Jul 7, 2014 13:35:19   #
Mike, It has been some time since I've commented. I've been "lurking" though, viewing and enjoying everything you've submitted. I always thought that your Alaska shots were the "best of the best" and now you've done yourself proud again with this incredible Yosemite series. Great, great stuff! Kudos.
Go to
Jun 1, 2014 15:00:50   #
If the weather is murky with heavy overcast, be a advised to crank up the ISO so that you can keep your shutter speed at faster settings to offset camera movement and bus movement. Yes, the bus driver/naturalist will stop and shut the engine down when there is an opportunity for wildlife shots but for many of the scenics, you will be shooting from a moving bus. Good luck and great shooting!
Go to
Mar 29, 2014 12:21:52   #
Thank you for posting this question. I too have been perplexed by the lack of useful information on the specific impact of the settings in this filter. Lesa Snider, in a webinar, said to just apply the settings that Photoshop CC presents since the filter is doing what she thinks is the best possible analysis. I tend to question whether that is actually true. I hope you get some good responses to your post.
-imageal
Trabor wrote:
With all the discussion of High pixel cameras (eg D800 ) long telephoto lenses tripods etc one related item seems to have not been discussed, the relatively new "Filter/sharpen/shake reduction"

I have the D800 with the new Nikon 80-400G zoom which I carry on my bird walks, thinking of adding a monopod

Even with the rather good VR I sometimes find that shake blur is noticeable at anything less than 1/1000, which frequently is fine on a reasonable day particularly if one is flexible on higher ISO,s

So I have been playing with the aforementioned shake reduction filter, which I find in some limited situations to provide remarkable results.
It works best with low noise shots without any prior sharpening

One of the interesting features of the software is a graphic of the routines analysis of shake and other noise if any in the picture- I think that it has helped in improving my technique by proving visual feedback

And dispite what the book says it can help with birds in flight as long as wings are not flapping

However I have not found any particularly useful tutorials on use of the routine, books will just list the controls and give them names without really explaining (well smoothing is obvious and artifact suppression adjusts the amount of correction where high numbers give less correction)

Has anyone had any experience or thoughts on this subject
With all the discussion of High pixel cameras (eg ... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 15, 2013 17:46:46   #
Re. scanning and posting moreĀ….Absolutely, if you have the time. And thank you!
Go to
Nov 15, 2013 16:22:45   #
Great stuff as always Mike. Love the "off the beaten path" scenario.
Go to
Oct 23, 2013 16:11:15   #
One Mac that has not been mentioned yet is a VERY powerful and capable computer, is a Mac mini. The mini does require a separate monitor. I formerly used a "tower" Mac G5 unit and loved it for years but it could no longer run the current software versions. I bought the Mac mini and it blows the case off that G5 for speed with the latest versions of Photoshop and Lightroom. The unit is a 2.3 GHz QuadCore Intel Core i7, 1TB HD, 4GB DDR3 RAM bought from Adorama for only $759.
This unit connected up to a LG IPS 23" monitor that has been calibrated. Great results, great reliability.
If you don't have a monitor, then I would suggest an iMac all-in-one unit.
Go to
Oct 17, 2013 17:55:51   #
rpavich wrote:
No idea.

When Printing at AdoramaPix, and you choose a size, it just tells you the "quality" that it will print at...(they use a graphic like on a thermometer scale; green = good, yellow = ok, red = bad)...I'm sure that in their site they say it but until now, I've never cared...I just go by what they say will look decent at what size.


This is from their site:

http://forums.adoramapix.com/entries/228318-resolution-and-image-quality


Thank you. That gives me a good place to start.
Go to
Oct 17, 2013 13:40:45   #
Beautiful result! Love both the original and the "Walking Dead" final.

What resolution was the 20 x 30 print made at?
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 16:52:08   #
Clynro wrote:
We were there the first two weeks of August. We were in the interior the first week--where the weather has been unseasonably warm this year (85 F in Fairbanks!), and the second week on the cruise. We had a little mild rain, but only enough to make me think twice about protecting my gear by putting it under my jacket, but not enough to prevent me from getting the shots I wanted. I also had a waterproof P&S for the worst times. I like that combo, but sometimes I forget to wipe off the glass protecting the lens, which leads to droplet shaddows which are annoying.
We were there the first two weeks of August. We we... (show quote)


Sounds like your timing was just right for this year. We were there two years ago and did the reverse trip. We sailed on Aug. 13th and finished up flying out of Anchorage about the 25th. The cruise portion was mostly rain , fog or clouds obscuring the mountains. The land portion was some rain but constant low clouds obscuring the mountains in Danali and enroute, low light most of the time. On the plus side, we did see a lot of wildlife and good fall color on the tundra.
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 13:43:05   #
Great shots and great weather! Since Alaska weather is so changeable and often quite wet and cloudy, when were you there?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.