You are coming off as very condescending, while some may have been rude as to your beliefs, it comes off as petty to try to belittle your opponents.

As for your posted image, who knows, could it be a secret moon base? It is possible, just not very probable. Unless you're implying aliens, and I would prefer to not go down that rabbit hole. I don't follow the rocket launches like I used to when I lived in FL, but I have not seen or heard of any US launches that have the size needed to put any sizable payload into a lunar orbit. So if you are claiming this is a super secret US base, logic would state that it has to be vastly under supplied. Honestly the image could be a crater in a larger crater. Since the image is buried in shadow it is only a guess, but what would the government benefit from by hiding such a great accomplishment. Hell they can't even keep their emails secret, to believe they have the power or strength needed to keep an operation of this magnitude under wraps is disingenuous to say the least.

Matthew

ok. When meteors hit, they kick up large and small rocks. I don't think that point needs to be defended. We see lots of craters with rays of debris strewn out from them. Some of these are very extensive, and can be clearly seen with a small telescope. Anyway, there are so many craters on the moon that any crater is pretty close to several other craters, as is clearly seen in this picture. It stands to reason that sometimes rocks that are kicked up by an impact will land in the bottom of another crater. Sometimes these events will result in large rocks that plow into the walls of a crater a bit.
Does all this not seem pretty normal? It would be weird if it did not happen. And what would that look like?
The alternative is what? You wondered earlier about possible secret installations on the moon. So that would take a very large budget and lots of people. Consider the latter point for a moment: lots of people on earth (and on the moon?) involved in a prolonged and secret operation on the moon. What would be the point? And no one talks? Ever?

That last one is pretty decipherable. It is clear that there are craters in craters in that one.
As for the first one, it is most likely to be merely a couple boulders that got stuck in a crater, possibly having dropped in after a meteor impact. It is weird, but not that weird, and that sort of thing should happen on occasion, given the number of impacts recorded on the moon and the clear dispersal of boulders and rocks ejected from those impacts. Just ask yourself: What would a few boulders in a crater look like? What would it look like in a slightly blurry, high contrast picture? I hope you can agree it would look like that first picture.

There is a famous moon picture from many decades ago of a house-sized boulder that had rolled down a slope, leaving spaced tracks as it went wobbling down the hill. That is still getting UFO enthusiasts all abuzz, because they see this surprising pattern and jump to conclusions. But 'ya know, although it is kind of cool it looks exactly like what a boulder down a hill would look like. I am sure you can find it and other examples like it with a quick search online.

Which definition would you like?

Cons piracy?
Conspiracy?
Cover up the Super Secret Moon compound?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracy

So maybe they should take you up for a tour?
You know, so you could see for yourself.

But then, you'd have to be killed. Can't have you blabbing all over the Internet.
They'd probably have to shoot you into the Sun.

I'm amending my own comment to ad this, I think the OP is trolling everyone.

He has stated:

"Digital photography made a giant leap in 1964 with the development of the Spacecraft Television Ground Data Handling System. It also was a groundbreaker in the use of bar code. "

And;

" I was part of the development team. I hope that you can understand what I have just provided you better than the image that you continue to ridicule. You can thank people like me for not having to buy film for your Instamatic."

First we have:

Early history of the Digital camera:


The history of the digital camera began with Eugene F. Lally of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, who was thinking about how to use a mosaic photosensor to capture digital images. His 1961 idea was to take pictures of the planets and stars while travelling through space to give information about the astronauts' position. Unfortunately, as with Texas Instruments employee Willis Adcock's filmless camera (US patent 4,057,830) in 1972, the technology had yet to catch up with the concept.

Steven Sasson as an engineer at Eastman Kodak invented and built the first electronic camera using a charge-coupled device image sensor in 1975.


Early history of the barcode:

On 20 October 1949 Woodland and Silver filed a patent application for "Classifying Apparatus and Method", in which they described both the linear and bullseye printing patterns, as well as the mechanical and electronic systems needed to read the code. The patent was issued on 7 October 1952 as US Patent 2,612,994. In 1951, Woodland moved to IBM and continually tried to interest IBM in developing the system. The company eventually commissioned a report on the idea, which concluded that it was both feasible and interesting, but that processing the resulting information would require equipment that was some time off in the future.
system
IBM offered to buy the patent, but its offer was not high enough. Philco purchased their patent in 1962 and then sold it to RCA sometime later.



And if the OP was involved with all of that advanced thinking and technology from 1949 to 1975, Why does he need to photograph is monitor? Hell my phone is capable of saving screenshots.


End of rant.