Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: rmorrison1116
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 656 next>>
Feb 13, 2023 16:20:05   #
Well, pretty much all of today's DSLR's and MILC's use CMOS sensors and have for many years. There is no Canon R80 but there is an R8. If you like your SL2's size, you may like the R50, which is the RF replacement for the M50. If you already have a 6D mk II, you already have a good Canon FF camera. Do you believe an MILC will allow you to get better images?
My daily shooters are a Canon R5 and R7. If you aren't interested in a camera like the R5, which is an excellent camera, and aren't interested in a crop sensor like the R7, the new R8 will do everything you are looking for. By the way, I use pretty much all adapted EF lenses on my R series camera bodies and they work great. Haven't had a single problem.
Go to
Feb 13, 2023 16:01:50   #
Welcome from Valley Forge Pennsylvania. Are you anywhere near Morrison Colorado?
Go to
Feb 12, 2023 15:20:01   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Air compressors have that drain valve, too. A failure of a compressor isn't as serious as the failure of a helicopter engine, though.


Diesel locomotives also have a valve on each cylinder to drain any water that may have accumulated in them. Trying to start a diesel locomotive engine without first purging any water from the cylinders may result in bent or broken connecting rods or cracked pistons.
Go to
Feb 11, 2023 17:46:57   #
DI Seller wrote:
I purchased a Nikon Z6II and a Nikkor lens about a month ago. I just learned that Nikon will not be permitting Z lenses to be made by third-party vendors (i.e. tamron, sigma, et al). I know Nikon makes great glass, but they are expensive, as everyone knows. So now I'm faced with keeping the Nikon or returning it for what was my close 2nd choice, a Sony a7iii. As some one here on UHH mentioned to me, there are a great many 3rd party Sony lenses. While I realize I could purchase the Nikon Mount Adapter FTZ II, it is $250.00 on top of the cost of whatever lenses I might buy. You may also sacrifice some lens functions with the when using other lenses with the adapter. I don't have a big budget for extra glass. I shoot pretty much everything, regardless of its nature (i.e. landscape, portrait, fast moving subjects and so on). I'm pressed for time so I need you input ASAP. Please, please no lectures, just advice. Many, many thanks.
I purchased a Nikon Z6II and a Nikkor lens about ... (show quote)


There are good quality adapters for way less than $250. Although I own several Nikon DSLRs, I don't own a Nikon MILC. I do own 3 Canon MILCs and only one RF mount lens. All three of my Canon MILCs, an R5 and two R7s, have EF to RF adapters on them and I have not had a single problem using any of my EF lenses on them. If I were in your situation I'd seriously consider going with Nikon and the adapter or seriously consider Canon, as Canon's selection of EF and RF lenses is better than Sony and Nikon's current offering.
Go to
Feb 5, 2023 17:42:22   #
therwol wrote:
They won't be flying passengers. There were only 44 still operating as passenger planes as of December 2022, and most airlines have phased them out. They aren't fuel efficient like newer planes. It is becoming increasingly difficult to get parts to repair them. I'm sure that some of those retired will be repurposed to carry freight, and they may continue to fly for some time. Time will tell.


Which makes perfect sense. Not only are they fuel hogs, they are getting, have gotten, old. But they indeed are ideal for freight. They can carry a lot of freight very long distances and the freight carriers don't have to worry about getting people to their destination, on time.
Go to
Feb 5, 2023 17:35:29   #
therwol wrote:
Boeing has a contract to make one more, a new Air Force One. I've read that it's late and running over budget.


I believe they were building two of them. Not really 747's but the military version, the VC-25. People call them 747's because they look like 747's and are based on 747's but really aren't 747's. Also, there is no single aircraft designated Air Force One. Air Force One is the designation of any US Government owned fixed wing aircraft that POTUS is traveling on, which more often than not is one of those highly modified high performance jumbo jets.
Go to
Feb 5, 2023 14:56:29   #
Cheese wrote:
The queen of the skies. What a classy way to go.


The 747 is NOT dead! They're simply not making them anymore. 747's will be flying for many, many more years.
Go to
Feb 5, 2023 14:37:49   #
Delderby wrote:
Stop being a silly billy - this is a photographic forum - not a forum about being ever so humble.


Why do people always play the, this is a photography forum card, when the category is general chit chat, non photography talk. What part of non photography talk don't they understand!? And it's not silly billy, it's silly bobby!
Go to
Feb 4, 2023 17:22:24   #
Sinewsworn wrote:
A few small bird shots for our yard 2-1-2023.

Fun to watch and photograph!

Download and enjoy!


Yes they are cute, and you do a really nice job photographing them.
Go to
Feb 4, 2023 17:18:52   #
I went outside last night and it was so freaking cold I couldn't use my camera because of my gloves and it was just too cold to take the gloves off. Sarasota is sounding pretty good right about now.
Go to
Feb 4, 2023 17:14:27   #
Delderby wrote:
My opinion - this topic with five pages of replies sums up how pathetic the forum is becoming.


So you prefer conversations with a minimal number of responses vs one with lots of traffic and exposure. Do you understand the concept of free social media?
Go to
Feb 2, 2023 16:48:50   #
burkphoto wrote:
To be clear, there are significant lens flange-to-sensor distance differences between dSLR lenses and mirrorless lenses. The shorter flange distance on mirrorless designs, due to elimination of the mirror box, enables better optical designs, especially for wide angle lenses and short zooms. Lenses specifically designed for mirrorless bodies are likely to perform better than their older dSLR versions, both because of the shorter flange-to-sensor distance, and due to improvements in computer-aided design, lens coatings, and lens manufacturing processes.

All THAT said, dSLR lenses that are correctly adapted to mirrorless bodies should perform as well OR BETTER than they did on dSLRs. Most people notice an improvement in autofocus performance over what they had on their older dSLR bodies. Optical performance should be the same, although better sensors in the mirrorless bodies may eke out a bit more image quality from an older lens.

When mounting some older lenses on very high megapixel count cameras, you reach a point where the lens cannot resolve what the sensor can record. That is where newer, better, designed-for-mirrorless lenses excel. At 24MP, you probably won't have issues with older dSLR lenses. At 60+ MP, you probably want the latest, greatest glass you can find. OR, you need to examine your reasons for buying a 60 MP camera, to be sure they are sound! (Bias-ply tires don't work well on a high end sports car, do they?)
To be clear, there are significant lens flange-to-... (show quote)


To be clear, I'm not a pixel peeper like so many others. I don't care about the mechanics of how it works as long as it works. I don't own a 60 megapixel camera. My highest megapixel camera is my Canon 5DSr, and it doesn't get used as much as it used to. I don't care about flange distance and stuff like that. I only care that the camera lens combination works. That's really all that matters, and as I said, I have no problem with my Sigma or Canon EF mount lenses working on my R5 and R7 with an adapter.
Go to
Feb 2, 2023 07:49:18   #
zug55 wrote:
The title of this thread is a bit misleading as Sigma is not producing lenses for Canon or Nikon mirrorless cameras--neither Canon nor Nikon are allowing Sigma to do so at this point. Thus the use of Sigma lenses on Canon or Nikon mirrorless bodies involves the use of adapters, which is less than ideal.

Sigma produces L-mount lenses, and of course they make lenses for the Sony E-mount. Early on, Sigma adapted Art lenses designed for DSLRs to the Sony E-mount. More recently, they have developed a line of lenses specifically for the Sony e-mount, designated as DG DN. These are quite good, but so far the only significant contribution to mirrorless systems.
The title of this thread is a bit misleading as Si... (show quote)


If the adapted lenses do what they are supposed to do, why is it less than ideal? I use my adapted EF mount Sigma lenses on my R5 and R7 and have not had any problems at all. They work just fine. Not having to spend thousands of dollars on RF lenses sounds pretty ideal to me.
Go to
Feb 1, 2023 18:05:23   #
Rongnongno wrote:
I am kind of wondering why folks add the 'H' when giving their opinion.

Either you have an opinion or you do not. If you qualify it as 'humble' you weaken it, basically typing it isn't worth much.

Instead, use either IMO or IMOO. The later meaning is only your own, based on your own experience, and not related to anyone else's.

IMHO as 'Humble'? Phooey.


It's a figure of speech, get over yourself!
Go to
Feb 1, 2023 12:05:51   #
Nice. They're a little early this year, aren't they...?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 656 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.