Gene51 wrote:
If you are not familiar with pano stitching, especially on the fly and hand held, then I'd say you might want to give it a try. Taking several pictures to cover a scene takes only a few more seconds than it takes to do it with a single take with a wide lens. Besides I have traveled to many places, urban and natural and often prefer to shoot wide views as a pano rather than switch lenses.
You may want to learn how to do panos before you criticize someone for suggesting it. You can try this if you have a cellphone, which generally have pano capability or you can download a pano app. It is a perfectly valid way to minimize your gear and get better shots. Try and keep an open mind.
Here are a few panos I did, on the fly, no tripod, while traveling in Dublin, Ireland, during a Jameson Distillery tour and afterwards. These were all shot with a 45mm/D800, the only lens I had with me at the time. The Jameson bottle Christmas tree was a double row pano. I suspect traveling in Italy offers similar photo ops and the technique could be used there as well.
Does this answer the question of why I bothered to bring it up? I am not sure why you would make the statement, "I doubt it is any good for the OP's trip", or bother to criticize me for bringing it up. I suspect it because you have difficulty with panorama stitching. The OP has plenty of time to decide if this will be a viable approach for him before his trip.
If you are not familiar with pano stitching, espec... (
show quote)
You really do a great job on your pano stitching. I don't think I would do as well. But one thing did make me laugh a little. Your second shot with the man standing in front of the table is missing the lower half of his right leg. :D