Posts for: rehess
Dec 24, 2023 07:57:31 #
TriX wrote:
Don’t let ill informed naysayers prevent you from using the safest, most reliable storage there is for a disaster recovery copy of your data. And in the event you think hackers are spending time looking through your tens of thousands of files for one nugget, remember use a major cloud provider that provides encryption.
Don’t let ill informed naysayers prevent you from using the safest, most reliable storage there is for a disaster recovery copy of your data. And in the event you think hackers are spending time looking through your tens of thousands of files for one nugget, remember use a major cloud provider that provides encryption.
If disaster recovery is important to you; these aren’t billing records that we’re talking about.
As I’ve already said, in over 50 years of photography, I’ve never protected my photos against serious loss.
Dec 24, 2023 07:52:27 #
Wallen wrote:
LOL, better go find something else play with, your a failed troll now.
Stop fighting yourself in the mirror and saying thats a stupid person on the other side.
Stop fighting yourself in the mirror and saying thats a stupid person on the other side.
or just admit that the other person has a completely different way of looking at life. Different people are allowed to think differently.
Dec 24, 2023 07:46:18 #
Grahame wrote:
That was pretty obvious, your negativity and lack of anything technically substantive fully supports your comments.
I have no camera that cost $6000 new, or even $3000 new, or even $1500 new. I set my Pentax to the slowest burst rate. I still think of Sony cameras as having a strange menu system, while enjoying the mechanical external controls of my Pentax DSLRs. What you describe as “lack of anything technical” is total total lack of interest in Sony products and seeing ther having zero place in my future.
Dec 23, 2023 23:39:53 #
RodeoMan wrote:
A problem that can be addressed by moving to a large format. When I moved from 110 to Advance Photo System, I was amazed by the improvement.
Film and 61MP aren’t comparable - one is not “larger” or “smaller” than the other - comparing them is like trying to compare “mm” and the color blue.
Dec 23, 2023 23:21:35 #
Grahame wrote:
Why not just admit, you don't want or need one to assist your photography rather that continuing to show your biased ignorance.
I have zero need for the claimed benefits of the new camera, zero interest in a MILC - I’m much more interested in the new film camera that Pentax may also release during the upcoming Spring. That MILC will have zero impact upon the photographs that I take. Incidentally, my photography is part of “everything” - but it won’t be touched by this thing.
Dec 23, 2023 22:41:57 #
Grahame wrote:
Ah, so just showing your ignorance of all the information that is around to date?
There is zero real information out so far, just hype, until it has been released and independent photographers have had a chance to use it!!
Dec 23, 2023 18:48:39 #
Grahame wrote:
You could make a far more compelling case if you actually came up with some technicalities and something substantiative as to why. Or is that beyond you?
I’m not trying to make any sort of ‘case’. I simply don’t know whether it gives good images. We will know more when it is in the hands of people not beholden to Sony. Punct.
Dec 23, 2023 18:14:05 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
There is nothing deep down inside us that can't be fixed by a larger sensor.
Then, those of us who use film have a problem.
Dec 23, 2023 17:26:22 #
Retired CPO wrote:
No. It improves the photograph!!
Only if you look at it with a magnifying glass. I don’t care how many fleas a squirrel has. I discourage viewers from zooming in - I want them the see the scene as I did.
Dec 23, 2023 17:23:24 #
Longshadow wrote:
...Only if I had another computer to play with.
I won't say that in 25+ years I never needed to do a recovery. I won't say that, Murphy may hear me.
I won't say that in 25+ years I never needed to do a recovery. I won't say that, Murphy may hear me.
In 25 years I may not saying anything - I’m in my mid-70’s right now.
Dec 23, 2023 16:29:35 #
zarathu wrote:
I know I feel inferior with only 45 MP. I may need therapy.
I have ‘only’ 24MP - I have no need of therapy.
Dec 23, 2023 16:25:24 #
DirtFarmer wrote:
And disabling OneDrive probably doesn't require replacement with additional storage media. I am not aware of any essential functionality of OneDrive.
And disabling OneDrive probably doesn't require replacement with additional storage media. I am not aware of any essential functionality of OneDrive.
The computers I looked at had smaller HDs because they were assuming data would be kept on OneDrive.
Dec 23, 2023 16:22:34 #
zarathu wrote:
You don’t understand. Its not a question of chasing its a question of not getting the shot because one is too far away, either in distance or in close-up difference. This is an issue you don’t have. No one want to see the pores in their nose.
Your last sentence explains why something like 24MP is plenty detail in most situations.
Dec 23, 2023 16:18:49 #
Dave Flash wrote:
For your consideration, a couple more shots of my first attempts. I do not think that they show a light leak, all be it they are not very great. Hand held.
The lighthouse is very white. My experience is that structures like that need to be underexposed - especially if the white part is siding; ‘PP’ can be used later to brighten the lighter parts.
Dec 23, 2023 15:57:35 #
rehess wrote:
Should go in photo gallery.
Not appropriate here.
Not appropriate here.
Ah - I see it has been moved to be with the rest of the birds. I can unwatch it now.