Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: gessman
Page: <<prev 1 ... 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 ... 536 next>>
Sep 21, 2011 00:00:44   #
FuzMuz wrote:
In regards to the Merganser photo. There are two rules you could "bend" slightly to achieve a great effect. First is Open Space the other is Room To Move. People assume these rules apply to the space in front of the subject, but in your photo apply them to behind the bird. If you can recrop so the bird is in the lower right third leaving "open space" behind the bird thus giving the opportunity to include where the bird first hit the water. Seeing the whole wake of the bird should greatly enhance the "feel" of motion. If you have the time and notion I would love to see the change.
In regards to the Merganser photo. There are two r... (show quote)


Thanks for the information. I don't recall cropping that image. What I do have is a sequence because I was shooting burst mode and this is the last in the sequence. I'll have to dig out all of those images and see if I can achieve what you're suggesting. I see what you're saying and it makes perfect sense. Thanks again.
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 21:43:49   #
DB wrote:
YUCK peanuts in soda :(
I thought this was a photography rule thread lol call the cops its been hijacked... hehehehehehehe

SWEET TEA in the south...... period.
Cornbread and pinto beans

OOPS I went back and read the first post.... are moonpies actually what you guys think about when you take photos????


I overlooked your last line above - only if I'm taking photos of moonpies.
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 21:38:28   #
marcomarks wrote:
DrDave wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running out of options here. My wife is a paranormal researcher/practitioner, and needs a camera that will take pix in the dark (moonless night..indoors with no light..etc). I have Nikon D80, but have been unable to learn how to "force" the shutter to operate when there is no light (even with flash!). Birthday is just around the corner (which is why I need this quickly!). She wants something simpler than the D80..doesn't like all the bells and whistles. I like Nikons, but need to know if you can make my camera perform..or what I need to be looking at. I really like some of the high-end Nikon point & shoot models, but would be wasting my money if I couldn't just step outside into the blackness and "take a picture" (The results are not important..just the act of photographing "whatever's out there")
Any and all help is greatly appreciated.
DrDave
Hi all, br I'm running out of options here. My w... (show quote)


You have a bunch of problems going on. Not only low-light exposure settings, and low-light boosted ISO electronic noise, but shutter speeds that could be so slow that you would get a blur where there should have been a distinctly clear ghost.

Have you considered shooting video for hours instead? There are some video cams that have infrared light for night shooting. My 10 year old Sony digital-video-on-tape cam had a built in regular light and it could be switched to infrared instead. That specific model was banned and replaced because it was found that with the infrared light on in daylight you could cause some bikinis to vanish in your video if they were made out of the right material and were wet which left the subject virtually naked on your tape. I've never done it personally but that's what was in the press as soon as somebody realized it.

Anyway, you also have the problem of getting the camera up and pointed at whatever paranormal thing that was supposed to be happening, getting your clue of where to point from your wife, and other things that could make you miss the shot altogether. Having a video with infrared light running all the time from an A.C. outlet means there is no shutter to release. Anything that shows up on video could be turned into a still later.

Just a thought...
quote=DrDave Hi all, br I'm running out of opti... (show quote)


Good thinking. As good as my EOS 5D MkII is, I've never shot it in complete darkness. Don't figure it would work too well but a person would just need to test it. Probably be too slow to avoid blur.
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 21:29:29   #
DB wrote:
YUCK peanuts in soda :(
I thought this was a photography rule thread lol call the cops its been hijacked... hehehehehehehe

SWEET TEA in the south...... period.
Cornbread and pinto beans

OOPS I went back and read the first post.... are moonpies actually what you guys think about when you take photos????


As we speak, I'm unloading a plate of pintos and cornbread. "You can take the boy out of the country..."

That new profile pic is good. Makes you look like a happy young lady who just experienced an important photographic experience.
:-)
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 20:36:12   #
Perry wrote:
Those of you from Michigan remember Vernors, don't you? Ginger Ale is just not ginger ale if it isn't from Vernors. It makes a great Boston Cooler. (Vanilla icecream, blended with Vernors.)


Oh yow, and when it's in Texas, it's Big Red 'cept in Waco where Dr. Pepper started. Dr. Pepper and a tube of peanuts or over a lil' ice cream. I love regional flavors and traditions.
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 19:31:42   #
gessman wrote:
DB wrote:
Great suggestions, Thank you once again. The 50mm was handy as I walked out the door. I am sure I will experiment with every lens, every combination of tube. I forgot to lock up my mirror and forgot the remote shutter. As you know, my mind doesn't always retain things as well as I would like. But with you helping along the way.... as well as a few others on here, I have great confidence I will be producing great shots.


Two words: cheat sheet!


Of course I know you were going for a "quick and dirty" quick run and weren't feeling good but I have a cheat sheet when everything's just about right.
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 19:30:33   #
DB wrote:
Great suggestions, Thank you once again. The 50mm was handy as I walked out the door. I am sure I will experiment with every lens, every combination of tube. I forgot to lock up my mirror and forgot the remote shutter. As you know, my mind doesn't always retain things as well as I would like. But with you helping along the way.... as well as a few others on here, I have great confidence I will be producing great shots.


Two words: cheat sheet!
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 19:25:57   #
ThomasS wrote:
I have about 5000 35mm slides, most taken with a Canon A-1 and a Besler Topcon and several hundred taken with a Kodak Instamatic (Don't be mean, it's all I could afford at the time). Is there a batch scanner out there that won't cost me thousands of dollars. A flat bed won't work, because it will take me forever and the quality is usually not good enough. I expect to have to do some post processing after scanning, at least on many of the slides.

Anyone with actual experience doing this? It is only a matter of time before I start losing those images, even though they are safely stored.
I have about 5000 35mm slides, most taken with a C... (show quote)


Nikon has put out several models of slide scanners and they have a auto-feeder that can take up to 50 slides per load. Mine is a LS-2000, the second generation and it does an excellent job unattended most of the time with a occasional jam up if I put slides in with different holders/frames which I try to avoid. My scanner also does negs but with no auto feed. It'll do strips and rolls which require attachments that are extra. The next generation is the 5000 I think and there are several on ebay now. There is one 2000 on ebay but it doesn't have anything except a single feeder slide attachment. However, there are auto loaders on there too that'll fit either the 2000 or 5000. The 5000s range in price up to around $2k but often go for much less. The slide feeders can be bought for under $300 on a good day.

The predominant method people are using now is is to buy one, do your slides and then sell it to the next guy who's hanging onto a wad of slides. I've been scanning mine in for some lengthy period now and still have ton to go. I use a HP flatbed for my medium and large format negs and slides. I mentioned the other day that I have 4 computers hooked up to a switching harness and the scanners are spread out between the 4 machines so I keep 'em juggling any time I'm sitting here not processing video.

It isn't difficult and you can set the software to adjust pics on the way in so you don't have to manually adjust each one but still you'll have to work on some anyway. Today, having used the scanners for some time, if I had it to do over I'd have to think long and hard about letting someone do it if it was within my budget range. It's not easy to turn loose of and if you have the ability to just drop 'em on somebody and pick 'em up later, that might be the way to go. 5000 slides x $ .20 = isn't too hard to figure out. Then, you've got the thing with ebay - is someone gonna "do" ya and there's no way to tell. Sure there's ebay and paypal's guarantee but the time involved...
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 18:32:31   #
I really like shooting macro with a long lens because you can get further away from a subject and really control the bokeh better. The one thing to remember when doing macro is that to achieve maximum depth of field, you have to close the aperture down, just as in any shot but the tubes shorten dof on you so drastically, the more tubes, the more the impact on clear focus. I shoot in AV mode and start out with a pretty high f-stop, tripod, shutter release, mirror lockup, shooting multiple shots, maybe 5, and then often take my f-stop all the way to as high as it will go, f-22, f-32, whatever. Gives us more options with the end product. I'm excited for you and anxious to see your grow with it. Hurry up.
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 18:23:37   #
You know, I don't see how anyone who is not shooting macro can keep their interest up. You don't have to leave you yard and can spend a lifetime not getting all the wonderful minute shots that are available to you. It gets old, chasing elk, deer, and goats around all the time. Sometimes it's great just to move a few feet, maybe even sit on the ground, and come away with a shot that makes you want to set up your own gallery. Macro is amazing and I can see you're off to a running start. "You go girl," as they say. I'm a fan.
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 18:13:38   #
DB wrote:
My first attempt at using my 50mm lens with extension tubes... Difficult to get close enough without scaring them off but one was ready to pose for me. This darlin little creature is less than 1/2" long, feasting on the necter of my stonecrop sedum.... will try more tomorrow... only cropped the photo, no other editing....

gessman this one is for you...thanks for the encouragement


Wow. Right out of the box and you're hittin' home runs. Doesn't get much better than that. I really like the multi-colored background behind the bug. You'll soon find the right combinations for whatever focus interests and it'll come flying together for you. Sorry you're feeling under the weather and not getting a chance to go all day. I know within reason that would be your urge. Thanks for posting these and letting us enjoy them. Will be looking for more, soon. Get better!
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 18:07:08   #
Dyluck4 wrote:
gessman wrote:
Dyluck4 wrote:
gessman wrote:
Dyluck4 wrote:
JimH wrote:
sinatraman wrote:
that was possible the best easiest to understand explanation of the basics Jim. you should be a teacher, i've noticed you have a way with the inexperienced. I salute you sur. What's the story with your avatar by the way, the bunny is so cool. :!:

TYVM.
I taught computer science courses at night for 17 years. I've been an IT consultant for 29 years, off and on, in addition to regular W-2 jobs. I've been explaining technical mumbo jumbo to neophytes all that time. I've found that generally, people are intelligent enough to grasp most any concept if it is explained clearly. Stay away from jargon and slang, use analogies to help make new concepts more familar, and don't look down your nose at the person trying to learn. Every computer geek in the world was a newbie at one time. So was every photographer, auto mechanic, cook, or brain surgeon.
quote=sinatraman that was possible the best easie... (show quote)


That's Funny Jim I have Bugs Bunny Tattood on my arm from when I was in the Navy, which also has a story behind it.
quote=JimH quote=sinatraman that was possible th... (show quote)


Is the story about the tattoo or the hootch that brought you there?
quote=Dyluck4 quote=JimH quote=sinatraman that ... (show quote)

Hey Gessman, That's funny well actually I was Stationed at the Amphibious Base Coronado in San Diego and everyone said I was like Bugs Bunny! As in pranks I was always know to get some body back last. Like Bugs Bunny did. You may get him but he would always get you back last.
quote=gessman quote=Dyluck4 quote=JimH quote=s... (show quote)


Uh oh! I must be careful with my witticisms with you. That's good to know. As you've no doubt noticed, my policy is "lock and load - fire at will." I'll be careful.
quote=Dyluck4 quote=gessman quote=Dyluck4 quot... (show quote)

No Worries Gessman, And I like your policy. I wished I was in Colorado with you. I really enjoy the winter and cooler weather better than any other season. I'm sure you have some great Photo's from your area. It seems where I'm at I will have to travel a bit for some good shots.I have the places in my head to go, it is just going. Keep in touch, hey are you on face book by chance?
quote=gessman quote=Dyluck4 quote=gessman quot... (show quote)


Nope, not on Facebook but put an end to that time drain. Gotta do something about this one too. This forum is infectious, if not addicting. I don't feel as though I want to miss anything and yet if I don't, it leaves no time to get out with the ol' camera which is what this is all about in the first place. There's so much good info floating around in here. I don't think I've ever found a more fertile ground for picking up tips. Never been to Indiana 'cept maybe just for a minute along the bottom there. I have subject matter falling on me around here. I wouldn't mind having some of my youth and vigor back but I hear it doesn't work that way. Still, we can find good shots wherever we are. Just have to use our imagination a little more.
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 17:54:42   #
sinatraman wrote:
Guys we are getting close tto the line here as long as we are praing God for the beauty of the subject matter and granting us of talent with photography we are all right, but we need to stay away from out and out theological issues as in why does God let bad things to good people? even g mans question is coming close to the line. Having unintentionaly been partialy the cause of two threads that flamed like gasoline poured on a texas wildfire i dont want this to be a third. cant take the meaness and confrontation.Jim H if you are serious about your question send me a private message and ill try to respond but I am no pastor. or send a pm to the ones who are. Now G man God gives us talents what we do with them is our choice. There is that free will thang again. God inspired Michalengelo to paint and sculpt, shakesphere to write plays, Louie L'amour to write westerns, John Wayne to act, Barry sanders to run a ball like no other.(I'm still not convinced Barry Sanders wasn't JESUS come down to play a little football.) We aren't the writers of the old and new testament where God is dictating and they are accurately copying everything He says. God lets you learn, part of learning is making mistakes, he understands that since he came down in human form and lived as a human for 33 years. There are talents inside me given by God that I don't know I have since I've never explored them. God could have granted me the talent to be the greatest polka band member ever, but i wont know that unless I decide to take up the accordian or clairinet. ( If I do someone please shoot me I hate polka.)
Guys we are getting close tto the line here as lon... (show quote)


Well, that sort of fits into my concept of the intent we've been told about. We are given the talents and it's what we do with them, whether we use them for good or bury them or whatever. I don't agree for one second that God's hand in on mine when I mash the shutter button. I'm hoping he has better things to do with his time and that I'm trusted to do what I sat out to do with the talent I have been given. I was given organs like the heart and others, it was set it up so they'd work involuntarily, and I was patted on the butt and sent on my way with an opportunity to flourish or wither. I think I would be letting down a creator who got me all set up and then have to follow me around to make sure I was functioning correctly. I'm not meaning to say that I'm taking credit for everything I am by any stretch but I was also given the talent to dig in and "get 'er done" and am proud of how I've done my job, as well as how and and why I got the opportunity. But, it remains, if you're going to give credit for success I feel you are obligated to explain failure.
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 17:45:10   #
tonidow1 wrote:
I think all the pixs are good


Thank you.
Go to
Sep 20, 2011 17:42:22   #
gdwsr wrote:
I will toss my perception in. I like #4 best: In all four I feel a visual pull into the center of the flower. With it vertical, I feels more natural to "fall" into the flower and with less black negative space the pull is stronger. (maybe I was an insect in a previous life). If the anthers were contrasted better with the background then my eyes would be more strongly drawn to them upon first seeing the photo and then drawn into the flower and back again. With this contrast I still am first drawn to the anthers and down into the flower but struggle to return to the anthers.

Which one do you like best?
I will toss my perception in. I like #4 best: In ... (show quote)


I'm old-fashion I think. I like it the way I saw it first which is #1. I can't turn lose of what made me take the shot in the first place. I've even thought about diagonal toward one of the upper corners. Think I'll go try that. Thanks.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 ... 536 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.