In terms of current use of the tools in my bag of tricks, I moved to mirrorless Full Frame and mirrorless Medium Format sensor cameras several years ago. My mirrorless Medium Format Hasselblad X2D is also designed to be used on-the-go, as opposed to stuck-in-a-studio.

I shot Nikon SLR and dSLR equipment for multiple decades [5]. As mirrorless technology arrived on the scene, I was so impressed the Sony mirrorless camera [v. 1.0] several years ago I purchased it [equipment design and function I preferred more than version 1.0 of the Nikon Z series. At that time]. However, making a full transition from Full Frame Nikon dSLRs to Full Frame mirrorless took a couple more years [navigating the Sony camera menus was like pulling teeth initially]. However, I have let go of all my Nikon dSLRs [except for a nostalgic Df and Zfc]. My Hasselblad X2D 100c, Sony a9 and Sony a7III are now my primary go to tools in my studio and on locations. These cameras are exceptional. Never was disappointed with Nikon’s technical attributes - resolution, pixel count, image sharpness, noise, dynamic range, color, and so on [it was the weight of the cameras and lenses for the dSLRs that was burdensome - especially when Lumbar 4 and 5 began acting up]. That being said, I am very pleased with my lighter weight mirrorless Sony and [yes even] Hasselblad cameras exceptional technical performance when it comes to those specifications as well.

What is in your bag of tricks?

Yes, I was aware of the K-01 since its release, but being APS-C, only 16MP, and worse yet having no OVF or EVF it was of little advancement to me. Only really cool thing was it could use in some fashion as has always with K-mounts used existing lenses. But I would be willing to use an adapter if Pentax had a up to date MILC with wider and deeper mount and flange. But they are going with a B&W K-3 III and possibly film cameras. Snore. I still have all the film cameras I need. And can not justify a used rolleiflex 6x6cm TLR, or other film medium format.

My remark was intended as a semi humorous tongue in cheek comment. Yes you are correct: film and digital are different. However 110 is film and APS is also film and my point was that I got "better" results when I went to the larger format of the APS. What I was really saying was that if going from a lower megapixel to a higher one, such as a 61 mp provided more details, etc in the image, then perhaps your going from 35mm format to say, a medium format film size might provide you with an improved image.

Neither have I. I never had to recover a local backup either.

The only reason I use the cloud is because it is available as disaster recovery, an "insurance policy for data".
I do not have only photos in the cloud, but all documents, manuals, spreadsheets, genealogy, checkbook register, every "data file" on our desktop.
Just in case.
An insurance policy is something one doesn't plan on using, but it it there if needed, like home, auto, ...
It's simply one for data.