Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: authorizeduser
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 68 next>>
Feb 2, 2021 07:27:45   #
Yes, this is the Sigma 20mm 1.4 DG HSM ART for Nikon
Go to
Feb 1, 2021 07:53:24   #
Sigma 20mm 1.4 DG HSM

Anyone have any experience with this lens?

Thanks
Go to
Dec 5, 2020 00:43:52   #
WDT52 wrote:
Do you have the Tamron dock? If so, would you consider bundling it?


Sorry, I never bought the dock.
Go to
Dec 1, 2020 22:38:04   #
No Longer Available
Go to
Oct 13, 2020 08:32:09   #
scaudill wrote:
Hi, I currently shoot with a Nikon D750 and was thinking about adding a prime lenses. I have been reading about the Tamron 45mm 1.8 and what I see sounds good but I would like to know if any members of UHH have had experience with that lenses and if so how does it compare to the Nikon 50 1.8 or 1.4. Thanks for your help.


I use the Nikon D750 with the Tamron 45mm 1.8 Di VC USM lens with excellent results. In my opinion the Tamon 45mm is sharper than the Nikon and better built. i have used it for about 6 months now and love it. The vibration control is amazing and allows sharp shots in low light. The Nikon D750 is already a low light marvel so the Tamron 45mm lens just enhances.
Go to
Sep 29, 2020 19:09:00   #
Tried B&W with my Nikon D750 and 45mm 1.8 Lens


(Download)
Go to
Sep 18, 2020 09:30:31   #
Looking to buy a used lens and would like some input

Anyone have experience with this lens and is it worth $495?

This lens is in near flawless, like new condition both cosmetically and functionally.
The only blemish worth mentioning is the slight marking on the bottom of the tripod foot from having an Arca-Swiss plate attached

Thanks for any comments


Go to
Aug 10, 2020 15:33:19   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Canon no longer stores the shutter count info in the image files. Instead, you have to download (and possibly purchase) software that connects to the camera via a USB cable to read the value from the camera directly. Where and how the data can be accessed changes with each generation of EOS DIGIC processor, so be sure you find software that explicitly lists support for your EOS T6i (a DIGIC 6 processor, camera EOS 750D).

If you have a MAC, you might consider this for-sale app that includes your camera type: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/shuttercount/id720123827?mt=12

This windows app is free, but I don't see your camera listed and the comments make it unclear if the EXE or the source code is being shared: https://sourceforge.net/projects/canon-eos-digital-info/reviews
Canon no longer stores the shutter count info in t... (show quote)


Shutter count software is FREE for a MAC but cost $7 for the Windows program.

This is one of the many reasons I sold ALL my Canon equipment and returned to Nikon
Go to
Aug 10, 2020 09:13:27   #
chrissybabe wrote:
You have just struck the two biggest problems of this world (or the people in it anyway). They are - total lack of communications and an ability to make some really stupid assumptions.
I stopped using Acronis (and went to Macrium Reflect) several years ago after being bitten by some Acronis assumptions. Mileage varies of course.


I fully agree. I dumped ACRONIS several years ago due to unreliable and unpredictable operation.
I now use Macrium Reflect and have NEVER had any issues what so ever .......
Go to
Aug 10, 2020 09:09:56   #
Soul Dr. wrote:
Well, that pretty much sucks!
They should have warning about that, to let users know before trying the beta version.

Will


There are always risks when playing with a BETA version
Go to
Jul 30, 2020 19:27:08   #
winger071 wrote:
Hi there.
Looking for some information on which brand
Lens is better.
The Tamron or Sigma.
The lens I'm looking for is the 70 to 200mm F/2.8.
Thank you all in advance.


In past years I normally liked Sigma but the last year or so I have moved to Tamron. In my opinion, Tamron has out done Sigma, at least so far. I already owned the Tamron 45mm 1.8 Di VC UDS lens and love it. Made of metal, vibration control, auto focus is fast and razor sharp. Was $599 and worth every penny. So I took a look at the new Tamron 70-200 2.8 Di VC USD G2 (Generation 2) lens. Looks a lot like the 45mm 1.8 only much longer. Same metal case and at 3.5 lbs is heavy. Performance is stellar. Auto focus is fast, vibration control has 3 settings and works perfectly. Lens also features a focus limiter. Images are razor sharp across the whole frame. Was $1299 and again, IMO, is worth every penny. Tamron also offers a 6 year warranty to boot. I have no regrets buying Tamron lens.

I am using the Nikon D750 Camera.

Jim Glenn - Monroe, MI USA
Go to
Jul 22, 2020 18:51:38   #
I returned the Nikkor 300mm 4.5 Ai lens for a refund since it turned out to be more trouble than it was worth. Since I already have a Tamron 45mm 1.8, and love it, I decided to buy another Tamron. Bought a brand new Tamron 70-200 2.8 Di VC USB G2 lens. Now all photos are crisp and in focus. No, it is not 300mm but then what good is 300mm if it will not focus. Got a 6 year warranty to boot. I am happy ................
Go to
Jul 22, 2020 11:37:39   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Yes, a few thoughts:

1. Why not just manually focus the lens onto the subject as best you can? Watching a dot in the corner of the view finder can't be any more efficient than just focusing on the actual subject with your eyes via the view finder.

2. Why not use the back camera LCD in Live View and manually focus on the subject as best you can via the 10x zoom of the display?

3. Why not mount to a mirrorless camera and use the EVF in the 10x zoom and focus on the subject as best you can?

4. What aperture are you using, older lenses rarely look good wide open. What did your results look like at say f/8 and f/11?

5. Why are you wasting your time with manual focus lenses if you want autofocus confirmation?
Yes, a few thoughts: br br 1. Why not just manual... (show quote)


I used F8
Go to
Jul 22, 2020 10:53:25   #
I have a Nikon D750. My Tamron 45mm 1.8 works flawlessly in auto focus. I tried to manual focus using the focus dot and the photos are all in focus so I know the camera is working properly.

I bought a mint condition Nikkor 300mm 4.5 manual focus lens. I setup the lens in NON-CPU and the aperture reads correctly when changed on the lens. So I went out to test the lens. I took 135 photos, taking photos only when I got a solid white dot. Well, all 135 photos are out of focus. Not some, ALL. I have tried close and distance. The white dot seems to mean nothing with this lens. Is this a defective lens or is this lens simply not compatible with the D750? It is in mint condition however it is about 50 years old.

Any suggestions?
Go to
Jul 20, 2020 17:31:27   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Check the compatibility chart in pendennis post. One of the issues with "compatibility" is that many teleconverters "extend" into the back of the lens when connected together. Therefore, the back / rear of the main lens being "extended" needs space within the lens interior allow the teleconverter to be connected.

The chart from pendennis doesn't seen to address the newest autofocus AF-S Teleconverter TC-14E III, but if an older TC works for an F-mount manual focus lens, I don't see why a newer model wouldn't also, still being a manual focus combination. Maybe there's an issue with communicating the aperture control given the TC sits between the camera and lens? On a DSLR this may be problematic for focusing. On my mirrorless bodies with extenders and manual focus lenses, the digital body can meter based on the light hitting the sensor, even with the aperture closed down to the desired aperture. DSLRs tend to struggle with the aperture anywhere other than wide-open for focusing, as the DSLR doesn't dynamically 'brighten' the viewfinder to match the exposure of a stepped-down manual focus lens.
Check the compatibility chart in pendennis post. O... (show quote)


This Nikon 300mm 4.5 Ai has no rear element and the hole is deep. Aperture blades are about 1/3 into the lens body.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 68 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.