And when have YOU ever backed up your bulls**t? Whenever you are asked a direct question all we get is "ad hominem" this and "straw man" that with a few "non-sequitors" and some insults thrown in...

Wow. I guess the 247 shot and k**led and the 1385 shot and wounded in Chicago so far this year must have some really s**tty family and friends...

I requested nothing. It was an illustration of the process, dumbass. But keep spinning. And not answering questions. It's what you're good at.

Thanks, peanut gallery... I refuted two of those ridiculous points. I didn't have time to do the rest. FOAD, troll.

[quote=Keenan]WTF is your point? You and your ilk will invariably point to non sequiturs, like the gun deaths in Chicago that have nothing to do with the issue of the thread, and pile on your tired, sophomoric sarcasm but I never see you are you "righty" compadres say s**t about something like the way gun nuts helped the San Bernardino Terrorists acquire their assault weapons to k**l 14 Americans and injure 24 more, or even the fact that NRA-funded GOP Congressmen blocked all bills that would keep those on the Terrorist Watch list from purchasing guns.

WTF is YOUR point, TROLL?
What "gun nuts" helped the SB s**theads acquire their mythical "assault weapons"?
Do you have any supporting documentation that shows your supposed connection between the NRA and GOP Congressmen? And/or WHAT bills they "blocked? Or is that just another of your talking points?

Apparently you seem to have a problem with the Terrorist Watch list. But then there's that pesky Constitution again. You CANNOT restrict a Constitutional right without DUE PROCESS. Do we have to spell that out for you again? I'm sure this has been gone over many times but I'll repeat it for you again. DUE PROCESS. Get it?

Hey, here's an idea... How about a special list just for you. It could be called the STFU List. Once your name goes on it - without ANY due process - your First Amendment right to free speech will be completely restricted. Does that sound fair to you?

For some reason I couldn't edit my previous post. The two points I refuted are in the quote so you need to "show quote".

Dude, you are full of it. Not sure of what exactly...
I only have time right now to detail a couple of the deficiencies in your post but most of it is slanted bulls**t.

See the link I just added above...

WTF is your point? You and your ilk will invariably point out one or two tragic gun incidents like this and pile on your tired, sophmoric sarcasm but I never see you or your "lefty" compadres say s**t about something like the 246 shot and k**led in Chicago year to date or even the 15 already this month.

EDIT: Link to where I got the numbers. Interesting data... http://heyjackass.com/category/2016-stats/

D********g animals.

Animals.

That is so d********g.

You are such a one-trick pony. You should take your act on the road. You know, the one that dead ends out in the middle of nowhere.

Some of that s**t she wears looks like it came from Kim Jong Un's closet...

Well they definitely wouldn't be right wings...