I got an email from a friend this morning. Late last night, she saw a car parked on the road, and a young woman walking up and down. She went out to see if she was okay. She had an argument with her boyfriend, and she threw his keys out the car window. My friend got her metal detector and helped her look, but after midnight, they still hadn't found the keys. I don't know where the boyfriend was, and I don't know what happened to the young woman. I'll have to see how the story ended. That was a real test for the boyfriend. Haven't we seen that happen in lots of movies?

As a continuation of the predicament the Nevada water situation is in, the water district is still paying $3.00 per square foot to replace natural grass with something else. Now many people believe this is good because it saves water, right? But replacing natural grass with plastic turf is wrong in so many ways; You lose the carbon capture of the grass, you kill the earth under the plastic turf so no insects can survive beneath it, You expose more plastic to the sun and get polluting vapors, rabbits have nothing to eat etc. So let's hear how the global warming extremist elite view this one! Is there a universal agreement?

I am not sure your assertion: “The birth rate and a******n have nothing to with the topic of crime.” is correct.

There is evidence that the overall crime rate decreased after the advent of a******ns in the ‘70’s. Genetically carried and inherited predispositions for criminal actions were eliminated (aborted) and the potential for any offspring to commit similar criminal activities was eliminated.

There is evidence this is the case:
https://www.google.com/search?q=crime%20rate%20reduction%20post%20a******n%20availability&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

And:
https://law.stanford.edu/publications/the-impact-of-legalized-a******n-on-crime-over-the-last-two-decades/

From which: “Donohue and Levitt (2001) presented evidence that the legalization of a******n in the early 1970s played an important role in the crime drop of the 1990s.“