Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: bajadreamer
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 137 next>>
Feb 11, 2024 09:24:59   #
This image is a good example of how new software and cameras have changed the way we can photograph birds in the dark rainforests. This is a Scale-throated Hermit from Brazil's Atlantic Rainforest. A common bird, it is frequently seen anyplace there are flowers, whether wild or garden. To try and freeze the motion of the bird (it is a hummingbird after all) I had to use a fast shutter speed. Because it was also dark (very early in the morning) That required that my ISO value was very high-16,000. ISO value is a measurement of how sensitive you want your camera's sensor ("electronic film") to be. The good news is that when you make the ISO very high, your sensor is very sensitive to even small amounts of light. The bad news is that your sensor is then also sensitive to electronic "noise". That can make your image very grainy and have no detail or color. Newer cameras and more importantly, new computer software can greatly negate this problem allowing images to be taken and used that, in the past, would have been instant deletes. Shot with a Canon R5, 600 mm f/4.0 lens; SS 1/2000, f/4.0, ISO 16,000. Processed in DXO Pure Raw, PS, and then passed through Topaz DeNoise at very low settings.


(Download)
Go to
Feb 10, 2024 12:40:53   #
Bubalola wrote:
You’ve done your best under circumstances, Baja!


Thank you for looking and commenting. All that any of us can do.
Go to
Feb 10, 2024 12:40:25   #
taffspride wrote:
Please don't sell yourself short. The photos I have seen of yours have been truly awesome. But I understand how you feel. I am trying to improve and there are times I feel everything goes back instead of improving. Don't give up.

Iechyd da

Ann


You are too kind. I appreciate the "kudos".
Go to
Feb 9, 2024 18:33:12   #
joecichjr wrote:
WOW I'll be more than happy to take your rejects, Baja
WOW img src="https://static.uglyhedgehog.com/imag... (show quote)


You are too kind. Thanks for looking.
Go to
Feb 9, 2024 18:32:53   #
taffspride wrote:
Good shot, you caught the catchlight in its eye. Glad it made the cut. I am doing the same, much more discriminating these days.

Iechyd da

Ann


As was stated earlier, "natural progression". I like to think I am improving, but sometimes I wonder when I see some of the spectacular images posted on line.
Go to
Feb 9, 2024 18:31:46   #
Retired CPO wrote:
I think that's a natural progression for a wildlife photographer, or any photographer I guess. But, in my case, when I get a marginal photograph of a rarely photographed animal, I keep it until I can get a better one. Whether I post it or not is another subject. But I'm glad you posted this one. The stones are not objectionably over exposed IMHO.


Thank you for your thoughts. I agree with you-I am much more inclined to keep a marginal shot of a bird that I likely will never see again than a marginal shot of a sparrow in my back yard.
Go to
Feb 9, 2024 18:30:27   #
Nalu wrote:
Pretty bird and good image quality for the bird. My sentiments about a good image have changed over time, as yours. In this image, the separation of the bird from the background is nice, a 600 prime can give you that and probably the main reason people buy a prime compared to equivalent focal length zooms. But, today, I would have chosen to delete this photo considering the vertical band of light "behind" the subject. I would also ask, how low were you? I am not a big fan of horizons bisecting the subject. In this case, having the camera at ground level would have helped eliminate this issue. It's interesting how our perspectives change the more we seek to acquire the "perfect" image.
Pretty bird and good image quality for the bird. ... (show quote)


You are absolutely correct. When I took this image I was sitting on my butt with the lens braced on my knees. This bird was originally up and to the left of the image, approximately eye level with me. All of those shots were caca; he then jumped down onto a gravel pathway and was gone in 3 seconds. Having the camera 6-12" lower would have improved this image a lot.
Go to
Feb 9, 2024 18:27:01   #
tcthome wrote:
Wish I could be that disciplined! Nice


My wife loves to photograph the birds too, so when we go on a trip, it is not unusual for me to have to review and cull 10,000 images a day. To survive, I have to be more ruthless with my culling than I used to be.
Go to
Feb 9, 2024 18:25:14   #
Manglesphoto wrote:


Go to
Feb 9, 2024 18:25:03   #
kpmac wrote:
Very nice. I'm harder to please now, too.


I guess the price of "getting better" (or at least watching too many You Tube videos).
Go to
Feb 8, 2024 22:39:50   #
My "bar" for pictures that I have taken has changed over the years. A shot that I would have been very happy with 5 years ago, no longer pleases me. The bird may be just as beautiful, the pose may be great, the image may be technically good, but if the background or perch that is in the image is not good, the picture often is immediately deleted. This image just barely made the cut. This is a Tufted Antshrike from Brazil. A neat bird, with a great crest and an active personality. The shot was taken early in morning, so there was not a lot of light to work with. To try to get the black bird properly exposed, I had to over expose the white rocks it was standing on. While this can be altered in processing, it still never will be pleasing. Shot with a Canon R5, 600 f/4.0, handheld. SS 1/320, ISO 8000, f/4.0. Processed in PS with bird slightly brightened and background slightly darkened. Topaz De Noise was used.


(Download)
Go to
Feb 7, 2024 18:55:01   #
These birds, Black-goggled Tanagers, are common in the Atlantic Rainforest of SE Brazil. These two, a male and female, were having a heated discussion one morning and I could not help but notice that he turned his back to her. In my household, that would be a major mistake.
Shot with a Canon R5, 600 f/4.0, at SS 1/100, f/4.0, ISO 12800. Little processing in PS and run through Topaz De Noise at minimal settings.


(Download)
Go to
Feb 4, 2024 15:30:20   #
No, as I pay the balance off totally as soon as it is posted. I use the "waived sales tax" option rather than the no interest option. I live in California-hence the sales tax option.
Go to
Jan 31, 2024 08:42:37   #
Will post a couple of birds we saw during our trip to the Atlantic Rainforest of Brazil (Mata Atlantica). These birds are notable, not because they are spectacular birds, but rather because they are not easy to see, let alone photograph. These are birds of the understory. They can fly, but prefer not to. They live in the dense undergrowth of the rainforest. Taking images of these birds usually requires either luck, or sitting in a hide/blind for hours at a time. These images were taken by the latter method. Arrived at the blind before sunrise and sat for 3 hours waiting. Finally they showed up separately. The first image, a Gray-fronted Dove was shot with a Canon R6, 100-500 lens at 428, f/6.3, SS 1/400, ISO 12,800, EC -.3 (a mistake). Processed in PS and Topaz DeNoise with saturation of bird brought up slightly. Second image is a Slaty-breasted Wood Rail. Shot with a Canon R6, 100-500 lens at 500, f/7.1, SS 1/40, ISO 5000. Same processing. Both shots handheld.


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Jan 28, 2024 14:34:55   #
Thanks to everyone for looking and commenting. I agree that these birds are anything but "plain".
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 137 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.