Perhaps missus Moore should shut up as the US response has been pretty damn good DESPITE the deadly response of the Democrat governors and mayors, highlighted by the Andrew Cuomo/Phil Murphy death marches into the long term care facilities.

Are you looking in the mirror again you little rino?????

I think the more important point is you have no answers, just emotional drivel and h**e.

Here’s the sequence......

1st post, InfiniteISO:
“Glad you pointed this out. Every set of numbers I've seen published are manipulated to make the US look bad.
Here's the deal: No matter how bad the US numbers seem, their perceived severity has nothing to do with our Federal response. A larger percentage of cases were caused by mishandling at the State level. Last time I checked the Feds didn't insist on seeding C***D cases in nursing homes or running mass t***sit systems with no mask requirements or sanitation programs.
The t***h of the matter is the working population of the US cannot shelter in place until there is a v*****e AND save our economy. As a population, the US was asked to stay at home until we could handle the spread. We did that and now we're going to handle the spread. As a retired person, the OP may not get that. When bread hits $10 a loaf, the OP MAY get that. The demographic that has to worry most about this p******c can keep their head down, the rest of us need to get back to work.”

2nd post, you to InfiniteISO:
“You may wish to consider checking various news sources to verify your suppositions”

3rd post, me to you:
“Are you questioning the existence of the Cuomo/Murphy death marches into the long term care facilities? Or the fact that NYC did, in fact, open public t***sportation to the homeless?
Which "news" of his are you questioning the source of?”

4th post, you to me:
“If you need to ask while continuing your political posturing, searching for answers other than the ones you seek to suit your agenda would be a waste of time.”

Now......the 4th post is a clear political statement as it refers to the facts I posted in the 3rd as political posturing. You might not like the reality, but I stated exactly what happened.

Now part II: So, exactly what “searching for verification on the items themselves” is required in this sequence????

As usual..... Wrong!

Those states not only had a lot of protests, TX and . Fla closed in early May (1st?).

Three spikes occurred WELL PAST the 2-14 day (4.7 day average)..... They coincided well with protests and A/C.

Only to as moron.

The experiment was to test the opening and measure the results.
Cases are up (driven by increased testing, r**ts and protests, young people at bars, etc,), while deaths are down by most measures.

Once you take out the abject failures of the East Coast places such as NY, NJ, Conn., Maryland...... The USA death toll is, manageable. Take out the 45% or so k**led in long term care facilities (not just the Cuomo/Murphy death marches, but include Minn.), And we're doing pretty well considering the options.

I think the word DID confuse him.

This coming from you, the political hack who pretends to beer a conservative?

Yes, I ask, because I can actually read and I read his post, your post, and I found yours to be very politically slanted.

Are you questioning the existence of the Cuomo/Murphy death marches into the long term care facilities? Or the fact that NYC did, in fact, open public t***sportation to the homeless?

Which "news" of his are you questioning the source of?

Wow! Talk about putting your ignorance on display.

As I said, cases by itself are meaningless. As states such as Fla. opened up their hospitals for non-C***D and elective surgery, and as C***D hospitalizations increased, this definitely had put pressure on hospitals (remember the curve?). These means mandating masks, enforcing distancing, backing off a bit on the opening, etc should all be back in play...... that's the point of the experiment!

You are so freaking sad!

There is no manipulation of numbers (which I suspect you already know), they are accurate, and they represent THE MORTALITY RATE.

The RESULT is that all but the truly brain dead can see the Canadian mortality rate for C***D is almost twice that of the USA.

Perhaps we're just hardier stock.

Good luck with your fragile ego where you cannot accept being grossly ignorant and wrong on a matter that only required you to read and comprehend!

Perhaps you shouldn't have engaged
your nasty attitude and bias before reading.

These anti-American f*****t progressives also tend to forget the non-homogeneity of the U.S. and our size. Anyone interested in a real comparison would use individual states to compare to most of the worlds countries.

Man, you continue to display your ignorance on a regular basis!

You might want to actually UNDERSTAND what the hell it is we’re talking about before you engage your limited brain... IF you could read you would see I addresses MORTALITY rates, not per capita cases. Please have someone read the following numbers to you:

USA
3042667 cases, 133062 deaths = .04373 or 4.47% mortality rate

Canada
105935 cases, 8693 deaths = .0821 or 8.2% mortality rate

Please note the words “mortality rate” and the fact that Canada’s is almost twice as high.

These numbers are from: v***sncov.com
C****-** C****av***s - Update
Last updated: 2020-07-07 21:50:06 UTC+7

Result? Gosh, YOU are screwing up!!! Of course, we ALL believe it!

Great captures!

.... And yet Canada had twice the mortality rate!!!!

Gosh, little Trudeau is really screwing up!!!!!