Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ChrisCat
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
Sep 27, 2013 08:26:25   #
Because of the replies to that original post, I found the perfect vest to take on my next outing. Lots of pockets inside and out, incl "hand-warmer" pockets, slim profile, and the soft, lightweight nylon and polyester fabrics sold me. The vest and a sling bag for the heavy stuff should be plenty. Thanks, UHH!

http://www.travelsmith.com/voyager-vest/14419?redirect=y
Go to
Sep 26, 2013 08:56:23   #
Nice ride!
Go to
Sep 23, 2013 14:21:16   #
alandg46 wrote:
I sure miss Kodachrome.


Me too!!!
Go to
Sep 23, 2013 14:11:55   #
Yes, would love to see a section for film. I learned with film and have been toying with shooting it again. I love my DSLR camera, but I think I'm getting lazy, could use some skill refreshening! Shot a roll not long ago, after each shot I kept looking down at the back of the camera to see how it came out!

ago
GeorgeH wrote:
I'm new here and this may have already been discussed, or perhaps I've missed an existing section. I imagine that many of us shoot film and digital. Any chance of starting a section devoted to film shooting and darkroom practice, both color and BW, and in all formats? I'd imagine that many newcomers to film would have a lot of questions, and those of us who shot alongside Matthew Brady could furnish some help. No need to re-invent the wheel! :)
Go to
Sep 22, 2013 08:59:40   #
If you are using Photoshop, there's an easier way. Put the signature with its white box on a separate layer. Instead of normal (at the top of the layer dialog box), choose multiply. The white will disappear.

georgevedwards wrote:
Sounds good...I have actually done that. I do not see consideration for once you have scanned the signature on a white sheet of paper, the signature file/image also includes the white rectangle of the paper. The first time I tried to transfer the signature it showed as a white rectangle with a signature on it in the corner of my photo. I tried to use the Magic Wand tool to select the background, then click "inverse" under "Selection" to isolate the signature, then use the "Move" tool to transfer it onto the photo image. It almost works, but if you have an enclosed space like in an "O" you have use the "Shift" key to add the inside of the letter to your original selection or else it will still show up as a white background.
Sounds good...I have actually done that. I do not ... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 18, 2013 08:48:26   #
Hi, I'm new here myself, welcome. Just a thought, have you changed camera cards lately? I read that they're good for thousands of reformats, but I had a similar problem with both cameras I was using after about a year, so I changed cards and noticed the images were a lot cleaner.

budcmor wrote:
Hi, I'm somewhat new here. I read a lot of the posts, and they have been very educational as well as helpful.
I shoot with a Pentax K-x and sigma telephoto 70-300 af, and macro. When I first got the camera a few years ago, I was very impressed with the crispness and detail of the higher megapixels from my previous point and shoot digital cameras. I always shoot in manual, but use af. Lately, I've been progressively disappointed by the "soft" focus in my photos. The camera is now in the shop to have the sensor cleaned as I noticed a couple dust spots on my photos. Is it possible there is also a film on the sensor that is taking away the crispness and sharp focusing? Any thoughts?
Hi, I'm somewhat new here. I read a lot of the ... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 12, 2013 13:00:59   #
Thanks, Scott. I'll have to remember to set the aperture 2 stops lower, or, more likely, shoot a lot slower with that lens. Must go experiment ...
Go to
Sep 12, 2013 12:57:04   #
photophile wrote:
I enjoyed meeting Nimbus. I have a Fujifilm SL 300 bridge camera. I like it has a great zoom and alot features.


Thank you, photophile. Your Amber is a lovely girl!
Go to
Sep 12, 2013 11:32:11   #
I wanted to try out both my 30-yr old Minolta 50mm prime lens and a new Nikkor 105mm macro, just to practice with both, not really to compare. But I thought these two photos of the same subject showcased the two lenses well enough to share. I like the warm, painterly effect with the old lens, though it does shoot a lot darker than I expected, given the aperture setting. The result of the adapter, possibly? The top photo was shot in bright sunlight at f5.6, 1/125, ISO 100 and I still had to lighten it a bit with the curve tool in Pshop. The 105mm photo was shot aperture priority at f8, also ISO 100.

Flower with old 50mm glass


105mm flower closeup

Go to
Sep 12, 2013 11:06:45   #
Nice PP work. I get the sense of a very intense being in Ki Ki's expression.
Go to
Sep 12, 2013 11:02:58   #
Sensorloup, The third one is very textural, I want to reach in and grab some. I love the contrast of the colors against the black and the light on the goblet in the first and second. Also the repetition of the shapes of the beans and the globules on the bottom of the glass.
Go to
Sep 12, 2013 10:51:11   #
Shot this of Nimbus for a photo class assignment a few years ago with a Fujifilm Finepix bridge camera. No flash allowed, so please excuse the noise from the high ISO. He's a mellow guy, as you can see.

Nimbus Awakens

Go to
Sep 5, 2013 08:56:01   #
fstop22 wrote:
First decide if shooting landscape or wildlife. Then carry either the camera with wildlife lens, or camera with landscape lens attached to tripod over shoulder. Carry extra battery, memory card in pockets. Not only will you be more comfortable but your photography will improve as your only concentrating on one aspect of photography. For me it's about comfort and serenity, one camera, one lens, one subject..


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: And you can usually find another pocket or, being female, I always have a small cross-body bag with me so your smaller lens can go in there.
Go to
Sep 5, 2013 08:40:37   #
I have used Shutterfly for two or three years now and am very happy with them. In my work as a graphic artist and art director, I used custom color houses and photo developers, so I know what to look for in prints, and the first time I tried them, I was so surprised at the quality I have used them ever since. I like the quality of the paper, and especially that they give you a "final look" at the actual crop before you hit the send key, with the chance to adjust it. The prints are reasonably priced and are mailed well packaged and protected. I also trusted them with a 200-page custom photo book. You can have them automate the layout or choose every aspect of the design yourself. The interface was a little cumbersome and took some getting used to, but since I had no deadline, it was fun. It turned out to be an expensive project, but I was completely satisfied with the results. Oh, and it's a great place to organize favorite photos and keep as backup. Completely free, no storage limit, and no minimum purchase required. The only other service I have used as a consumer is Snapfish, which does require a purchase each year. I was not impressed with the small calendar I made with them: the calendar part was right on the edge of each page and the paper and images were dull.


HEALS3113 wrote:
Has anyone ever used Snapfish or Shutterfly for ordering prints? If so, what are your thoughts concerning quality compared to a professional service from a camera store?
Go to
Sep 5, 2013 08:13:53   #
Just beautiful. Thanks for sharing. Adding the Raynox to wish list. :wink:
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.