Posts for: R.G.
Mar 29, 2024 02:28:10 #
#6.
Mar 26, 2024 07:22:49 #
Lots of interest here. In #1 I don't care for the car window framing the shot. It might have been better just zooming in on one or two of the H-shaped structures.
Mar 26, 2024 05:40:51 #
If high resolution is important to you, a large sensor is the way to do it. With a larger sensor the pixel size is less diminished.
Mar 26, 2024 05:32:42 #
#1 says style and quality whereas #2 - #4 say arty in different ways. You should choose whichever one you think best represents your output. I think I'd like #1 more if the camera was more easily recognisable.
Mar 25, 2024 14:33:01 #
Something tells me that pmsc the poet and pmsc the AI artist are going to be quite a dynamic duo.
Mar 25, 2024 12:12:04 #
Jimmy T wrote:
... Your pic is perfectly sharpened and your sky looks much better too . . . sigh.
It remains to be seen whether a straight edit or something more creative will prove to be more popular.
Mar 25, 2024 12:08:21 #
Jimmy T wrote:
R. G. Great take on the photo. I don't see any &qu... (show quote)
Thanks. Apparently all I gave it was a -1.6 rotate adjustment and a vertical stretch. If possible I use a vertical edge or corner at or near the vertical centre line to get the rotation right and then decide if it needs a vertical perspective adjustment. In this case I decided it didn't need one, which I confirmed by checking both the extreme left and extreme right vertical edges. My advice is to always do the rotation first and then the perspective adjustments if required.
Mar 25, 2024 12:00:24 #
terryMc wrote:
To be clear, I don't think I said it was never intended to generate images from scratch, only that it is not very good at it, and Adobe recognizes that. It has to do with the way the softwares are trained, and Firefly is limited in that regard.
I did say that I don't use Generative Fill for creating images from scratch, but Firelfly is capable of that and was intended to do that. It just does it poorly, compared with other engines.
I did say that I don't use Generative Fill for creating images from scratch, but Firelfly is capable of that and was intended to do that. It just does it poorly, compared with other engines.
OK.
Mar 25, 2024 11:17:23 #
Bill Hancock wrote:
If I understand your question correctly, both are AI images. The Adobe image is very poor in my opinion and the Bing image is more natural and is closer to looking like an actual photograph. I used the same command in both images. "Cardinal bird sitting on a small tree limb with snowy background."
I assumed that the procedure was to start with an actual photo and then instruct the AI what you wanted done to it. If, as Terry says, the Adobe Generative Fill was never meant to generate images from scratch then it's not a fair comparison. My question was based on the observation that Adobe editing in general seems to be biased towards keeping a natural look.
Mar 25, 2024 10:53:56 #
Jimmy T wrote:
I couldn't figure out the twist but I did adjust the level and perspective and added a couple of R.G.'s secret settings...
Damn, I wish I'd thought of getting the grass cutter in.
.
Mar 25, 2024 09:19:37 #
Would I be right in thinking that in the Adobe image the bird is closer to the original, as in using your bird image instead of generating one from scratch using AI?
Mar 25, 2024 03:37:05 #
Mar 24, 2024 11:37:43 #
If you want something that works for very long exposures, my Nikon cable shutter release has a feature where you can depress the button and push it forward, which holds the button down until it's pushed back. Your camera's cable release may have a similar feature.
Mar 24, 2024 10:24:40 #
mikedent wrote:
... will take the 3 shots but the shutter button must be held down the entire time...
I think you'll find that all cameras work like that.
Mar 23, 2024 13:50:45 #
Everybody has memories that they can recall. A photograph is a memory on steroids.