Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Japakomom
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 49 next>>
Jan 19, 2018 18:24:47   #
Great shots! Are you the team photographer for the Oilers? Used to live in Allen and my son played hockey with the Allen Americans Youth Hockey club.
Go to
Jan 19, 2018 13:54:48   #
I shoot sports with my 5DIV and it does a great job!
Go to
Jan 19, 2018 13:54:18   #
If they are EF lenses then they will work.
Go to
Jan 17, 2018 11:14:59   #
Chris T wrote:
That could well be, Japako ... but, I did get that right from the horse's mouth - someone who actually lives there ... did you read the rest of the quote?

In case you missed it, here:

The farthest north Eskimos are known as the Inupiat (or Inupiaq, if you will) further south they are known as the Yupik, (or Yup’ik)
The Aleuts are actually of unknown certain origin, and live on the Aleutian Peninsula and Aleutian Islands. Whatever they were originally, there was extensive contact between them and the Russians, beginning in either the late 1600’s or early 1700’s. As a result, many Aleuts have Russian names. In South Central Alaska, where we live, there are a couple different Alaska Native tribes. Locally, there is the Knik tribe, and on the Kenai Peninsula there is the Kenai Tribe, or Ke’inai (or something like that) who are related to the Aleuts. The Knik tribe, and the Eklutna Tribe are more closely related to or a part of the Athabaskan Indian Nation.

The Eskimo people seem to be generally shorter with wider, more dished faces and oriental-looking eyes, somewhat resembling the Mongolian people. They theorize that they migrated here from Asia when there was a landbridge between Alaska and Siberia, and that the Diomede Islands are likely that last vestiges of that land bridge. The rest has disappeared under the Bering Sea. The Aleuts seem to have a lot of White influence, so more closely resemble caucasians, although that’s not 100% across the board. The Athabaskan people are taller and more straight-legged,while the Eskimo people have tendency toward bowleggedness. The Athabaskans also have a narrower, longer face, and resemble many of the native American Indians. The Knik and Eklutna people don’t really look any others, particularly, but more like the Athabaskans. I think there may be a lot of mixed blood there. Just so you know, all of this doesn’t include the native people of Southeast Alaska, the Tlingets and the Haida’s, and there’s one other. If I recall correctly, the Tlingets (pronounced klinket) have been fisherman and the Haidas have been more warlike, but also fisherman. I believe they are related to the coastal tribes of British Columbia, Washington and Oregon.

That could well be, Japako ... but, I did get that... (show quote)


As an Alaskan, I can tell you that Inuits live in Alaska and have their own Native Corporation. I am well aware of the different natives that live in the state.
Go to
Jan 16, 2018 11:47:18   #
Not sure what metering mode you are using, but you might want to try spot metering. If that blows out the sky too much, maybe evaluative metering.
Go to
Jan 16, 2018 11:42:47   #
I have heard of changes in Zion NP - no more tripods. Has there been a change down by Page in the canyons?
Go to
Jan 16, 2018 11:40:32   #
Chris T wrote:
Well, Mike ... there are NO Inuits in Alaska - Greg (WingPilot) - who I think you've mixed me up with - Gawd knows why - could tell you that.

Inuits live along the northern frontier of the Northwest Territory, Nunavut (their home base) and western Labrador ....

Greg would tell you this - The farthest north Eskimos are known as the Inupiat (or Inupiaq, if you will) further south they are known as the Yupik, (or Yup’ik) The Aleuts are actually of unknown certain origin, and live on the Aleutian Peninsula and Aleutian Islands. Whatever they were originally, there was extensive contact between them and the Russians, beginning in either the late 1600’s or early 1700’s. As a result, many Aleuts have Russian names. In South Central Alaska, where he lives, there are a couple different Alaska Native tribes. Locally, there is the Knik tribe, and on the Kenai Peninsula there is the Kenai Tribe, or Ke’inai (or something like that) who are related to the Aleuts. The Knik tribe, and the Eklutna Tribe are more closely related to, or a part of - the Athabaskan Indian Nation.
Well, Mike ... there are NO Inuits in Alaska - Gre... (show quote)


Sorry, your information is wrong. There are Inuits in Alaska.
Go to
Dec 7, 2017 10:58:10   #
Do you have the push-pull version?
Go to
Nov 14, 2017 12:04:17   #
Sounds like you would be better served by the D7500.
The D500 is by far the better camera but if you are not willing to learn how to make proper settings then go for the all auto camera.
Go to
Nov 14, 2017 11:59:45   #
dhowland wrote:
It's so weird because it reads to me so much like a net, physically between you and the subjects. good luck figuring it out!


It does, that is why I think it is something being reflected onto the filter. The plexiglass has probably picked up a reflection of the net and passed it onto the filter. The distortion being changed as the angle of the lens/filter changes.
Go to
Nov 14, 2017 09:14:35   #
brooklyn-camera I wrote:
As I stated already, not shooting through anything except air. Shooting the game from the players bench. So I would say that your conclusion might be correct but not for me or these shots. Thanks anyhow.


As previously stated. You are shooting through a filter. That is more than just air. Take it off and shoot another game. I bet you will no longer have this problem.
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 09:01:34   #
Go to Southeastern Camera - there is one in Wilmington. You can see and feel the cameras and all your questions can be answered.
Go to
Nov 11, 2017 12:37:39   #
Steve Perry wrote:
Those were really hard. They are not Photoshop though. The area has a mix of water and grass and I would time my shots (as best I could) to have as much grass and as little water as possible in the shot. The grass was relatively far away and the terns were only like 25 ~40 feet away, so the grass became a nice blur - but there wasn't much of it so I had a VERY tiny "zone" where I could capture images like this.

As an aside, that nice blur is one of the reasons I like to shoot fast primes over slower zooms. The only problem is that with the birds at such close range with a 600 F 4 set to F4 there is VERY little depth of filed, so getting the eye perfectly sharp is tricky. I had quite a few shots that were tack sharp somewhere on the bird, but not the eye. In a scenario like this, it's impossible to get ever shot perfect - but I had enough good ones (those three are just the tip of the iceberg) that I was completely happy.
Those were really hard. They are not Photoshop tho... (show quote)


Thank you for sharing! The shots are fabulous!
Go to
Nov 11, 2017 10:29:37   #
Steve Perry wrote:
These were actually at a new place for me - Edwin b Forsythe NWR in NJ. It's actually a pretty cool location. As we were going though, the road went over a drainage pipe thingy that was flowing into the little pond area and these terns were going nuts with all the fish it was stirring up.


Was that the natural background shown in your shots? Or did you do something to change the background in PS? Just want to know why my backgrounds do not look nearly as nice and clean as yours, other than I just suck at it
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 11:27:42   #
toxdoc42 wrote:
Anyone know of a strap that stabilizes a camera to your body so you don't need to have a hand on it to stop it from bouncing around? Does anyone beside me believe this would be valuable?


Cotton Carrier
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A=details&O=&Q=&ap=y&c3api=1876%2C%7Bcreative%7D%2C%7Bkeyword%7D&gclid=Cj0KCQiAlpDQBRDmARIsAAW6-DPhVxaMUf1cM6JPKPxcCj6Rn7ag5MGXj7cpEPzbVF2UNemMMwydeWAaAnE7EALw_wcB&is=REG&m=Y&sku=836943
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 49 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.