OddJobber wrote:
What I Think I Know: Minolta M/MD mount lenses have a shorter flange to film plane distance than Nikon F mount. Thus, a Minolta to Nikon adapter requires an optical element.
The Problem: What's the point of mounting up a good quality lens and degrading the image with a low quality adapter element?
The reason I ask: I think I'm in love with a beautiful Minolta M/MD mount Kiron zoom lens, excellent shape for her age (about 33) and a smooth operator, no creep and has zoom lock. Very clean and no diseases or fungus. 80-200mm macro f:4.5-32. I don't want to put her in a situation where she can't perform at her best.
Dilemna PLEASE tell me there's a solution that doesn't require serious surgery. Or is this a case of interbrand coupling that wasn't meant to be? I've been disappointed before, so I can take it.
Opionions Please?
b What I Think I Know: /b Minolta M/MD mount len... (
show quote)
Hi, I know I'm late with this for your purposes, but figured people might like know. I bought a Zykkor adapter for my trusted old friend, a Minolta 50mm prime MD lens, to work with my Nikon D3100. I'm still a beginner compared to most of you, but I'm happy with the adapter and have some comparisons for you to judge for yourselves.
First Set: The first photo is with a Nikor 105mm macro, aperture priority, f4.5, ISO 400. The next is using the Minolta 50mm prime with the adapter, manual. I believe this is the closest to the original color since the camera did not impose any programming on it at all.
105mm
50mm w/adapter
I's Here! Love all the ibises, irises, ice, the inlet, and all the "I"nventive photos. I'm thinking ice. Here's a scan of a Kodachrome slide from the 1980s, taken in Alaska. I wonder if that glacier is still there? And a couple of snaps from some ice I set up for this topic. I had to add food coloring to it before I could focus on it!
Glacier Ice
Red Ice
Ice Platter
Thanks, Steve. Appreciate the look and comment.
SteveR wrote:
The background is perfectly chosen and just the right amount out of focus. Excellent.
Lol, that's why I almost never do them. Spent so much time with that one, I had to reheat the coffee. ;-)
doduce wrote:
I like it. The light is a good compositional element. Some folks think still life shots are easy. Not so much, right?
Thanks to all who welcomed me and said nice things! Everything here is interesting; I love that so many people are able to appreciate photos for themselves as well as source material for even more artistic expression. After all, many painters use photos as sources, so why shouldn't computer imagers? Brent, your photo from under the flowers could be an illustration for Alice in Wonderland; William, "you go hungry" and "the lost grid" are standouts; Clasina, loved what you did with the beautiful marigold photo in Reflections; creativ simon, the daffodils are knockouts; llindstrand, love the kaleidoscope images, and the Balboa Park series, the last set of infrared images look like ice carvings; thewrightthings, so many "right" things! Sorry if I left anyone out, not intentional.
John Lawrence wrote:
Beautiful shot. I'm half Italian so I can appreciate the tradition behind it. :thumbup:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
I bet a lot of patience went into these. Good work!
Another great thread. My "two cents:"
Abandoned Concrete Blocks
Holocaust Memorial in Berlin
Thank you, Cam2000, the memories are better than the coffee. And thank you also, Linda. I love the feedback, I'm here to learn. :) :)
I appreciate your taking the time to post, Doduce, you are absolutely right with your observations. Actually, that was as stopped down as I could go; I was using a telephoto 4.5f 55-300mm so I could get close and still have everything in focus. Maybe I could try the wide angle and crop tight. Below is another view of the same subject I took at the same time with the same lens. I'm afraid the background is still pretty messy though.
doduce wrote:
Personal preferences are important decisions in why and how we all take pictures--that's why there are a billion shots of El Capitan. Two comments. I find the background distracting. Is there some other place you could shoot it or stop it down to throw the background out of focus? Second, I would move the four elements in the still life closer together, then move in closer, so the important parts of the composition would fill up the frame and let us see more of the details of the cup, etc.
but that's just me. :)
Personal preferences are important decisions in wh... (
show quote)
AM brew facing out
Yes, please do! Thanks for looking.
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
Great photo------------
I love it!!! I love good coffee-------and bet it tasted even better from that cup!
I have set composed coffee pot shoots also---just a lot of fun
I'll have to post some -------------
Nothing common about this composition. Beautiful!
Just for fun, I had to make a special brew this morning. And then, of course, photograph it. The cup and saucer, etc. are from a set that my grandfather gave to my grandmother back in the 1920s when they lived in Little Italy (lower Manhatten). What are you drinking today?
am brew
William wrote:
I guess fuddy duddy is not the option here.
What a fun post, so much talent let loose. Loved looking at all 40 pages! Please allow me to contribute some of mine ...
When Worlds Collide (2 flowers and a bud)
Dahlia on Acid
Floater
One more: a down-sized poster grouping
Thanks for the info. Am pleased to see the Essex train ride listed here, since the local photo group, SCLIPs (Suffolk County Long Island Photographers) has scheduled it for next month. Keeping fingers crossed for good weather!