Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Steven Seward
Page: <<prev 1 ... 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 ... 437 next>>
Apr 5, 2017 16:08:41   #
dljen wrote:
I never read Idaho's articles, they rarely have anything to do with the subject at hand.

You don't know what you are missing. It would be better than reading the dumb posts on HedgeHog!
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 16:07:30   #
dljen wrote:
You know where they are, why should I take my valuable time and effort to type it out for you because of your laziness? Duh, that must be a toughie.

Is this truly the way you think? Or is it just an excuse to cover up the fact that there isn't any actual evidence of Trump's collusion with Russia? Come on, this is so easy, I'm giving you a curveball that you can hit right out of the park. You can show my ignorance to all by pointing to the evidence. Like Dirtpusher, you don't even have to waste your time typing your own thoughts, you could just send a link to something to do the talking for you. Instead I get nothing, nada zilch, zip. Anybody else care to help her out? PLEASE! Show me where I am wrong.
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 15:55:03   #

Those were great articles. I know you're wasting your time trying to get Djen to read them, but I sure did.
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 15:48:56   #
Frosty wrote:
Nonsense comparison.

If someone is in desparate need of medical services who is it that will deny it even if they did smoke cirarettes?

The ACA REQUIRES everyone to have their own insurance so that they at least pay a portion themselves.

This "free choice" to not purchase insurance is not really a free choice for others. If someone is very sick or in an accident and is taken be ambulance to the ER room and "choose" not to obtain healthi insurance, they won't set out on the street. They will receive care. Who pays for it? Well, the patient will pay if able, or they may go bankrupt leaving the bank with a loss. The hospital will charge others more for services to make up for the loss. Insurance companies will be charged more for the same reason. One thing for sure....the people providing the healthcare won't be doing it for free because the patient decided the exercise their free will and not get insurance.

One persons "free choice" becomes someone else's burden.
Nonsense comparison. br br If someone is in despa... (show quote)

The ACA does not require that everyone have their own insurance to pay for healthcare. Of the people that Obamacare claims to have insured, the vast majority were simply put on Medicaid instead of buying health insurance. You are no doubt referring to the "mandate" that everyone must buy health insurance. This applies only to people who make enough money to do so. Also, the "mandate" was illegally put on hold by Obama's executive order until his last year in office so that he didn't have to hear the complaints by people being fined for not buying insurance.
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 12:49:43   #
dljen wrote:
No Steve, I'm not going to support your laziness. You know that there are tens of thousands of stories out there so look them up and read them. If three security agencies have been looking into Trump's possible collusion with Russia, you surely have to be worried. For god's sakes, use your head, Steve. Trump puts one thing above all other--money. He couldn't get money from US banks and had to go elsewhere. All roads lead to Moscow. His cabinet is stuffed with those having ties to Russia. I am not trying to be nasty, I'm just surprised that he still has ppl believing him. He's batting 0 as a president. We don't and can't have a country run like a business, look how Tillerson is bombing as the SOS. Everything can be secretive when you're running a company, especially ones that don't answer to shareholders. When you're a public official, there's t***sparency in government, when that doesn't exist, it's rife for corruption. We now have Jared in charge of virtually everything. Trump is wrong for the US in so many ways but ppl have to recognize it first.
No Steve, I'm not going to support your laziness. ... (show quote)

So you are not going to provide the evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians and that makes me lazy???
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 12:15:51   #
Keenan wrote:
If you agree that it is an accurate description, then why did you complain? You don't make any sense.

Me thinks thou speaketh out of both sides of thy mouth.

I complained about Lala's notion that Trump will be impeached for colluding with the Russians. Eye Saw You was absolutely right on that and she was wrong.
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 12:12:57   #
No words to convey the amazement. I'm all for the California exit v**e.
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 12:07:33   #
Bazbo wrote:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/opinion/stanley-mcchrystal-save-pbs-it-makes-us-safer.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region&region=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-right-region

That's it! I am all for having kids watch more television because General McChrystal likes it.
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 12:04:54   #
What gets me is that Ted Kennedy k**ls a woman, does not report it for nearly 24 hours, and is then elected to the Senate for life, and even runs for President! And this was way before Democrats lowered their standards!!
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 11:51:44   #
Keenan wrote:
Steven, if someone behaves like a d********g potty mouth juvenile, then what am I supposed to call him, if not a "d********g potty mouth juvenile"? Why would you have a problem with accurately describing someone's behavior?

I had a problem with you saying I justified it. I didn't say it was inaccurate.
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 11:49:31   #
dljen wrote:
Says Fox. Spread your wings, try listening to different stations, you could even (gulp) read. Google could open your world.

Okay Donna, why don't you provide us with the supposed evidence that Trump or his team colluded with the Russians? It should be very easy. There are tens of thousands of stories about it out there.
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 11:47:31   #
Keenan wrote:
Steve, quite justifying EyeSawYou's d********g, potty mouth juvenile behavior just because you share his politics. There is no justification for such vicious, abusive behavior. He did not merely "ask her to show evidence." He accused he of being a liar and a bunch of other stuff that he had no business spewing at her, particularly when he doesn't even know her, and she just joined in the discussion and is new to the Attic. She likely won't be back because of how she was treated by the right wing foul mouthed asshole trolls, who drive a lot of good people away. I don't blame her if she never comes back. Why should anyone put up with such abuse?

You really should stop making excuses for the unjustifiable behavior of so many d********g trolls on your team. You right wingers have a HUGE problem with such rampant immaturity and viciousness, and you need to face this reality. Something is wrong with the conservative mindset to have such a consistent proportion of these d********g, angry, h**eful, juvenile name callers. It gives ALL of you conservatives a bad name. Additionally, such extreme double standards and excuse-making reflects badly on you.
Steve, quite justifying EyeSawYou's d********g, po... (show quote)

"Justifying Eye Saw You's d********g, potty mouth juvenile behavior?" I said I can understand her annoyance with the name calling. Do you even read these things before replying??
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 10:54:28   #
MsLala wrote:
You know I've admitted a number of different ways I've obviously made a mistake and for some reason it just isn't good enough for you and others. I'm done. I've been cordial, I've read all of your unsubstantiated name calling and for a forum built on respect of others I find you and Leica absolutely rude and ruthless. You seem to enjoy bashing others, well find someone else to rant and rave over because apparently you have nothing better to do with your time but to go after me. Talk about nick picking like a bunch of hens in a henhouse. And as far as Trump, he admitted in the beginning when he entered the race to see if he could win the Republican nomination, never expecting to win the White House. Also, with all the issues he has caused, wiretapping fraud, remember FBI found no substantial evidence of any cause for such accusations and Russian influences into the e******ns, FBI still investigating, Trump has weaseled his way into his own corner and losing Republican support as we speak. So when I say, my OPINION, he will either quit because he has never been one for confrontation, just as your opinions about my intellect, or will be impeached for colluding with Russia directly or indirectly through his campaign advisers I don't believe I'm that far off. How many months has he been in office and how many scandals have come to light? Just saying. So, please if you're going to come back at me with the same bs lying, liberal, snowflake, blah, blah, etc. save your fingers because it will fall on deaf ears. I know nothing I say will change your mind, nor nothing you say will change mine. But the name calling is really getting old and childish and I would expect it from my students not gentlemen who have experienced life. Thanks, Laura
You know I've admitted a number of different ways ... (show quote)

I can understand your annoyance with the name calling, but Eye Saw You has a point when he asks you to show evidence that Trump or his campaign aids colluded with the Russians. Despite the avalanche of news stories about it, there hasn't been a shred of evidence so far to suggest that. Even the FBI, who is investigating it, said so. There is overwhelming evidence however, that Obama surveilled the Trump team during the e******n, and this gets almost no news coverage.
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 10:39:54   #
MsLala wrote:
Who in your opinion are those worthy of aid, just wondering. Not at all trying to start an argument, I'm truly interested. Thanks, Laura

In a few quick words, "the elderly and infirm." That would include people born with genetic a******lities and the incapacitated. Trouble is, the overwhelming number of people collecting welfare are healthy and of working age. Even a huge portion of those on disability are healthy. Just in the last eight years the number of people on disability has doubled to around 16 million, or 5% of the population. Does this mean that there has been some sort of explosive epidemic of diseases and accidents in the U.S.? I don't think so.
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 01:41:15   #
MsLala wrote:
You know what's a shame...those that abuse it and therefore those who really do need it are criticized and grouped in with those who take advantage of the system. Or do you think everyone on aid must be lazy, incompetent, uneducated, worthless or receiving aid illegally rather than going out to get a job? Just curious.

I think that the vast majority of people on welfare are "lazy, incompetent, uneducated, worthless, and receiving aid illegally rather than going out to get a job." There are relatively few people deserving of aid. Welfare has become a way of life for tens of millions of people. Right now, one out of three Americans is getting some form of means tested welfare from the government. This is appalling.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 ... 437 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.