Sharp. Very sharp.

I would choose the D850 just to be on the leading edge of the hobby. Sounds like changing lens inventory from Canon to Nikon will not be a big problem for you. Go with the best according to most reviewers and get the D850 while you can. I'll bet you'll be very pleased with your decision.

I had the same 2 kit lenses you mention. Both covered the range I needed but I needed a decent prime lens for low light. Wound up buying the 35/1.8 and the 50/1.8 primes. Both are excellent lenses that get good reviews. I would recommend either one or both to fill out your needs. If I could choose only one, it would be the 35/1.8.

The 18-105 G OSS was one of my 1st purchases. Then the 135/1.8 Prime, then the 150/1.8 Prime, then the..............it just gets worse and worse. How do I stop the madness?

I too must confess that after a pilgrimage to the Holy Shrine of B&H I came home with a Sony A6000 mirrowless with a sack of Sony lenses and accessories on the back of my mule. It was one of the most exhilarating experiences of my life. I felt totally reborn.

Sounds like you favor Canon over Nikon at the outset. You can't go wrong with either choice. Take the advice already offered to do your own research. Read the reviews on the photography websites and look at the comparisons on YouTube. Go to Bestbuy and handle all of them. I would encourage you to consider a mirrorless camera. Mirrorless cameras seem to be the wave of the future. They are smaller and lighter and take superb photos comparable to those shot with a bigger and heavier DSLR. I have Sony, Nikon, and Canon cameras and if I could have only one, it would be my Sony A6000 mirrorless that you can pick up with a couple of excellent Sony kit lenses for around $850. Do your research and make your own choice. You can't go wrong with any of your top choices.

So many fake reviews on the internet is the reason I would much rather read ratings on equipment on this forum from UHH members who actually use the equipment they are recommending. I have made purchases based on what I have read here from respected members. Thanks to all who take the time to tell us about their experiences with their equipment, good or bad.

I have monovision. Right eye is far sighted and left eye is near sighted, So after the surgery both eyes were still monovision. It works out great as you can still see near with one eye and far with the other eye. The brain selects whichever eye is required to be dominant for what you are looking at. The only adjustment I had to make on my cameras was those little wheels next to the EVF that selects the best diopter for best focus. My photos have improved in focus since I re-adjusted the diopters. From now on I'm going to check those diopters every 6 months to make sure they show the best focus possible.

Sold by B&H Photo. Made in Germany of high-grade German optical glass with brass threads to prevent seizing up, and reasonably priced. If I can't find the filter I like made by B&W I buy Hoya.

...don't have a lot of money
...a little more zoom
...street photography
...more candid shots from farther away

The excellent little 55-200mm kit lens fits your needs exactly, except for the requirement to "go lower than 3.5". As most of your photos will be taken outdoors in natural light, this lens gets great reviews and at $146 brand new from B&H, it's a super-bargain. Take a look at it and see if it might fit your needs. I have a D3300 with the 18-55 and the 55-200 and and it's an excellent and reasonably-priced package that performs great for the type of photography you like.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/55-200mm-vr.htm

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1111441-REG/nikon_20050_nikkor_afs_dx_55_200mm.html

Another vote for IrfanView. It's free, it's easy, it's fast. It's a one-click operation. Been using it for years.

Rowdy has come a long ways in the last few years. I used to not be able to stand him, but you have to admire his skill at the wheel. He is seriously in contention for the Championship this year.

That's very interesting. After years of recommending everyone shoot JPEG and let the camera do the correcting, I've seen on a few websites that he has changed his mind and now recommends shooting RAW. I cannot find any article that confirms that. And I always thought Canon lenses were generally more expensive than Nikon lenses. So much to learn on the internet....and so little time.

...which will most likely wind up in B.o.B.'s pocket.

I have seen the curvature of the earth with my own eyes. In 1966 I took a T-38 Talon up to over 50,000 feet where you could clearly see the curvature of the earth. It was a beautiful and impressive sight.