Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ssymeono
Page: <<prev 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 40 next>>
Dec 15, 2015 10:20:35   #
Digital photography has created a new and rather miraculous form of capturing images by allowing us to stitch together hundreds, even thousands of images, that have the potential of revealing with great accuracy vast views. At present, we use the word "stitch" or "photomerge" but it would be better to have a proper term that is also flexible for creating additional terms from it. We have in English a word from ancient Greek that means "stitch", as in "rhapsody", which means "stitched song". After thinking about it for a while, even consulting with a great philologist (my friend Robert Lamberton), we came up with the term "photorapsy" that resembles photography and may also provide the adjective "photoraptic" or even the noun "photorapter", like photographer" and a verb "to photorapt".
Opinions and suggestions for discussion are welcome.
Sarantis
Go to
Dec 15, 2015 09:36:58   #
RWR wrote:
In defense of Braczko, 232001 is stated as the first AIS serial number in the Nikon Compendium (English Edition, April, 1993, Appendix, Page 181), and also here:

http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/serialno.html

(Who to believe - looks like you're outnumbered three to one!! :lol: :lol: )


Even if outnumbered 300 to 1, there is no doubt that I own an AIS #223259! This means that either everyone is mistaken or else I have a rare pre-production model. Look for yourself. I am not showing it, but the attachment ring does have the AIS notch as well.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Dec 14, 2015 22:38:48   #
RWR wrote:
Nikon also made a 105 f/4.0 lens head with the F mount for bellows from 1969 to 1975, with aperture values in 1/3 stops, same as the 135 f/4.0 rangefinder bellows lens head.
My 105 f/4.0 AI (Serial Number 200862), without the focus lock, pretty much lives on my F5 full time.

Edit: On page 199, Peter Braczko mistakenly says the AI version, beginning with serial number 186956, can be identified by the focus lock screw.


You mean to say that it is the AIS that has the locking screw. You are right, Braczko made many mistakes with numbers, his task was too difficult to keep track of. He also says that the AIS version begins with serial number 232001, but I have an AIS lens #223259, so he may have meant to write 223001.
Go to
Dec 14, 2015 10:00:45   #
In the hands of a skilled photographer like you (you demonstrate it in your two great pictures), these lenses achieve miraculous results. The lens is compact and feels quite heavy at 500gm.
As a footnote to your excellent history, I am reading in Peter Braczko's, The Complete Nikon System (Rochester, NY: Silver Pixel Press, 2000, p.198) that Nikon issued an SLR version of the rangefinder lens the 10.5cm f/4 in March 1960 but produced few of them and they are very rare today.
Go to
Dec 11, 2015 10:03:52   #
quixdraw wrote:
And the retail on this gem will be...?


Better not ask, don't you like surprises?
Go to
Dec 10, 2015 12:54:37   #
CatMarley wrote:
It is a 3 pound lens with a 14 blade aperture, and a front element that is 100 mm across. It is a whopping piece of glass. A lens element 100 mm across that is going to be sharp and give an image evenly illuminated edge to edge is expensive to make. It also lets you swap mounts.


Amazing! At this size, this lens resembles those massive ones made for view cameras. Schneider is making them now for digital. One may wonder whether it is possible to reuse the old ones on the best digital equipment (?).
Go to
Dec 10, 2015 09:51:51   #


Quality and rarity: the 6mm captures a 220 degree angle of view, which means it's difficult to shoot without seeing your shoes or hands in the picture and if you point it upward, you can see the entire sky, as well as the horizon at 360 degrees. One of my first purchases was the 6mm, only the f/5.6 version, but a very early version from 1969 (the 28th lens made of this model).
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 09:04:18   #
Rongnongno wrote:
When we look at facebook and most social media it has become more 'where I have been' than 'what I have seen'.

This changes many aspects of photography (this being my opinion).

I was struck by this while reading an article on the BBC about the Mona Lisa. There was an accompanying video (I did not play it) but the photo showed folks taking picture of themselves with the painting in the background. 'I was there! Awesome!'

What do you think?
When we look at facebook and most social media it ... (show quote)


To put it mildly, it plainly demonstrates a low cultural level. People like this don't belong in museums or in cities with cultural institutions that are supposed to teach us the lessons of history with genuine materials from the past.
Some museums prohibit taking such pictures. You may also see these people staring at the label next to a work of art longer than the work itself. One can only imagine what sort of citizens these people make and what sort of politicians they vote for.
Go to
Dec 8, 2015 17:32:38   #
blacks2 wrote:
Thank you very much, appreciate your comment, I have seen some very nice stitched panorama shots but I am too old to learn. I do sometimes create panoramas just by cropping.


If you have and use Photoshop, there is nothing to it: go to FILE (second column), choose AUTOMATE, and go to the bottom of it to choose PHOTOMERGE.This will lead you to a new box and ask you to BROWSE. You select any number of images of 2 or more that you have shot in a more or less straight line with 30% overlap. When you are done, simply press OK and it's done. Try it, it's wonderful!
Sarantis
Go to
Dec 8, 2015 11:37:39   #
I love these pictures! The downloads are like being there! You have captured the essence of Yellowstone. I wonder if you thought about panoramas and for some reason found them not suitable to the landscape (?)
Go to
Dec 6, 2015 11:59:32   #
Rongnongno wrote:
Anyone tried 'walking panoramas'???

(stitching pictures taken from points of view)


I have tried it once but was not successful in that the images did not coincide as planned. I have been thinking that with greater overlap of 50-75% and as many as 50-100 shots it might be possible to get perfectly horizontal panoramas. The question remains whether it would be worth the time.
Go to
Dec 6, 2015 09:23:45   #
Dngallagher wrote:
I have played with, and continue to take pano's at every chance I get since discovering how relatively easy it really is.... a 25 shot vertical handheld (actually all my panos have been handheld) usually shot on manual.

A selection can be seen here if interested.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/dongallagher/albums/72157631114585642/with/20274345128/


Great selection! I adore panos, but how do you do it with people, don't they move?
Go to
Dec 6, 2015 09:15:50   #
LFingar wrote:
You're welcome! The reason I found the gloves was because I was searching for some good quality thermal underwear. If you are out in the cold much you may want to check out what they have. The pair I just received are lightweight, fit very well, and surprisingly warm. Light years better then the cotton-blend ones I've used for decades.


I am also curious: what sort of thermal underwear did you find?
Go to
Dec 3, 2015 09:18:51   #
Pierre H.J. Dumais wrote:
It had snowed gently all day and it stopped as the shadows were long.
A redo in monochrome.



Please view in 'download'.


This classic picture speaks to all of us : "Merry Christmas everyone and have a great winter!"
Go to
Dec 3, 2015 09:15:00   #
ephraim Imperio wrote:
Send me some raw nef photo files and I will guide you step by step on how to process raw files in view NX2

My email address is: ecidi@comcast.net


Is there a reason for not posting your guide in this forum?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 40 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.