I’d rather not listen to a proven liar, a con man, a draft dodging misogynist, a sexual harassing, p**sy grabbing fool. The are good Republican conservatives I would listen to but they’ve all gone to ground because of trump and his lemmings. The only thing I could learn from this poor excuse of a man is how to cheapen my morality as a human being.

In all sincerity, I cannot understand how some of you, those who might be reasonably intelligent, support this imposter. As bad as things might have been before, this guy has made things far far worse.

My love, read the post... it was posed as a question as to what other people believe will happen. Once again you contribute nothing other than another pathetic personal attack.

What a bitter woman; I hope you enjoy the angry life you’ve made for yourself

👍

Well I live on every word of praise you utter for that Orange baboon

Better yet, stay out of my thread if you can’t admit you ignored the question I presented and tried to impose an Inapplicable solution.

Did you order the book yet?

I’m impressed that Mitch is even speaking up. Trump has owned him since trump hired Mitch’s wife as a cabinet Secretary of T***sportation.

You don’t have to an American to see the t***h. Trump is a liar and that may be the best thing I can say about him.

Past experience, I’ve never invested in a company not dedicated to the pursuit of profits.
Your request for links is silly unless you’ve never invested in the market.

You presume that all of those changes would occur at a moment's notice. Ramping up domestic production will take years. For instance, look at MP Materials; they supply rare earth elements' ores to China for refinement. China now says they will curtail our access to ores we supplied! This is a national security issue and even with a full out effort, it will take MP Materials years to provide domestic production.

Your point about finding alternate supplies is equally wrong for today. Even if advantageous pricing was available, increased production is not. Additional production capacity would have to be built to meet their increased demand. You're being unrealistic about today's problems because you're looking at this from a macro-economic perspective.

So, once again you deliberately misrepresented a point. You changed the scope from the present, with which I am very concerned, to a future solution that will be correct in time but wrongly applied in this thread.

Read a book.... I've picked one out just for you

(Download)

Get a grip - no one said anything about a static economy.

You have an unpleasant habit of misrepresenting another person’s intent and then railing against the straw man you created.

Read a book...
about common courtesy (and one about integrity while you’re at it)

The are two sets of tariffs. The goal of the Mexican tariffs is to compel Mexico to impede i*****l i*******ts from crossing our borders. The goal of the Chinese tariffs is to reduce China’s manipulation of our trade relationships.

While the goals are different, the result will be the same... a regressive tax on Americans. Once consumer prices are increased to pass along increased costs, those increased consumer prices will very likely remain in effect when the tariffs are removed.

A second problem is the effect on farmers. As China finds alternate suppliers of food, our farmers’ market share will likely be permanently reduced.

When tariffs are removed will prices be lowered?

Highly unlikely....

Elaine, you would have to matter for me to feel anything at all but you don’t. The Mayor of London just compared trump’s behavior to that of an 11 year old. You so admire trump that you mimic his behavior. That’s sad but I’m sure you disagree.

Wow... I guess P. T. Barnum was right.

Don’t know where you got the idea I oppose COiTUS. If you do it would help explain your cantankerous nature.
🙄