Posts for: chasgroh
Mar 15, 2024 12:37:24 #
billnikon wrote:
I shoot beside folks that shoot it all the time, a... (show quote)
...well sure I have, I've owned a Z9 pretty much from the beginning and I'm plenty happy with it. I've *learned* it. There are many many pros shooting Z9, and if there's one thing they, and me, have in common is that constant battle to get better...not just images but operating the equipment. You've made a choice and have stuck with it, and it seems like you're firmly away from Nikon. Bravo. Your work is fine and I've commented on that fact before. But this is a *Z9* thread, eh? AFA your side-by-side comparison that's anecdotal at best. I feel quite sure you'd LIKE operating a Z9 and master it quickly, much more quickly than those you're rubbing elbows with.
Mar 14, 2024 13:07:56 #
billnikon wrote:
As a long time Nikon shooter I am thankful that Ni... (show quote)
Just curious...when's the last time, if ever, you've shot with a Z9?
Mar 9, 2024 20:41:04 #
wvgal wrote:
Yes it is a night game. I thought the noise was pretty bad for the settings. Thank you
...when I had my D500 I wasn't in love with its noise factor at night under, usually bad, stadium lighting. That said, even with my D5 and/or Z9 I will reduce shutter in order to denoise the shots. I've had good success with a 500th which will give you a stop!
Mar 8, 2024 22:53:05 #
Mar 7, 2024 14:10:26 #
Mar 7, 2024 13:13:49 #
[quotePart of her point is that not every photo opportunity requires the heavy iron to serve the purpose of recording the scene for its intended use and audience. [/quote]
...I think the crux is "...not every photo opportunity requires the heavy iron..." which is inherently true. My thought, however, is that if you *have* the heavy iron, you, at very least, have a puncher's chance at success in most, if not all, instances.
...I think the crux is "...not every photo opportunity requires the heavy iron..." which is inherently true. My thought, however, is that if you *have* the heavy iron, you, at very least, have a puncher's chance at success in most, if not all, instances.
Mar 6, 2024 22:32:45 #
coolhanduke wrote:
As you know, they quit letting you take pro gear to concerts years ago and don’t think anything has changed.
Issues of people selling prints not to mention their size.
But since you mention Stevie Nicks, in early 70’s I went to see Fleetwood Mac in DC. Was right up front with my Minolta SRT 101 and Vivitar zoom lens.
.
Issues of people selling prints not to mention their size.
But since you mention Stevie Nicks, in early 70’s I went to see Fleetwood Mac in DC. Was right up front with my Minolta SRT 101 and Vivitar zoom lens.
.
..I'm thinking you got some shots, yes? Can we see???
Mar 4, 2024 12:32:54 #
BigDaddy wrote:
Makes no sense. Why do they care if the jpgs started out as raw only capture? I can see why they don't want gigantic raw files, and certainly jpgs are all a news organization would need, but how the photographer took them originally is a moot point I would think.
...ignorance.
Mar 1, 2024 11:52:16 #
foathog wrote:
Has BILLSONY been taken?? Nikon wants their name back
Haha...no sh*t!
Feb 26, 2024 12:09:24 #
My immediate thought would be to take a high rez photo of that pic..*then* work it in PS. Make sense? I had to scan some olde newspaper material in my dad's scrapbook and they were too big for my scanner...I found a bigger scanner, lol. That was long ago, now I would photograph the items!
Feb 26, 2024 00:00:51 #
Feb 25, 2024 13:28:49 #
Ed Chu wrote:
Sorry- Delta UT ( Google Delta UT snow geese, and articles will pop up )
Haha...t'anks!
Feb 25, 2024 13:26:13 #
Delta. What Delta? Great directions and time slots, but if I wanted to go there I'd be outa luck. ;0)
Feb 24, 2024 12:45:13 #
I'm on it and didn't even know I was! Haha...last of the Intels...
Feb 24, 2024 12:39:20 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
Some folks have a hard time accepting that this b... (show quote)
So, a new "AI Artistry and Photography - all religions welcomed" might be a possibility.Yes Ma'am! (Salute!).